“modestly significant”

The moderation analysis showed that PDs with a non-traditional format have a highly significant effect on self-efficacy ( g = 0.820, p = 0.000) and PDs with a traditional format have a modestly significant effect on self-efficacy ( g = 0.462, p = 0.000).

This is highly significant in EUR, when compared to the negative control regions, and modestly significant in ASN (<p = 2x10 -7 and p = 0.01 for EUR and ASN, respectively) and appears inconsistent with the null hypothesis of neutral evolution and demography at the LCT locus especially in the EUR populations.

Migraine showed modestly significant genetic correlations (Bonferroni-corrected P < 4.8 × 10 − 5 ) with chronic pain duration and susceptibility ( r g > |0.5 | ).

Respiratory coupling above .25 Hz was highly significant ( p < .0001; Figure 3A ), whereas cardiac coupling above 1.7 Hz was modestly significant ( p < .0142; Figure 3B ). 3.1 Risk assessment model The individual seizure values underlying Figure S3 served as features for training a logistic model, producing propensity scores for each seizure, which further distinguished SUDEP from non‐SUDEP cases.

Using the function “protest” with 999 permutations, the data sets were found to have modestly significant correlation (m12 squared = 0.758, corr. = 0.492, P = 0.001), and their ordinations show similar separation of sample types along the first and second principal components ( Fig. 6A ).

The significance level of treatment separation varies across principal components (PCs); both environmental treatment main effects are strongly significant in PC1 and PC3 ( p < 0.001) and modestly significant for PC2 (0.05 > p < 0.001; Appendix S1 : Table S4 ).

Correlations between MEHS and chronological age were modestly significant only for the U15 group ( r = 0.37 and p < 0.001).

Before and after cancer, the neurologist visit rate was slightly higher for cases than controls, but the post-cancer IRR was only modestly significant (IRR; pre-cancer = 1.08 [1.04–1.13], p = 0.001; post-cancer = 1.04 [1.000–1.09], p = 0.05) ( Table 3 ).

Our multivariate analysis demonstrated a modestly significant relationship between minority race / ethnicity and stroke (OR: 1.02, P < 0.001).

Yet, it is only modestly significant in TRACCER ( P = 0.0014) and extremely significant in RERConverge ( P < 1E−07).

Meta-analysis showed that for immediate effects, the BIT conventional subscore had a significant and large mean effect size (ES = 0.76; 95% CI 0.28–1.23; p = 0.002) whereas the BIT total score showed a modestly significant mean ES (ES = 0.55; 95% CI 0.16–0.94; p = 0.006).

A number of previous psoriasis GWAS have directly compared genotypes between PsC and PsA 14 , 30 ; for example, Nair et al found modestly significant frequency differences between PsC and PsA for SNPs at the HLA-C ( P = 0.006) and IL12B ( P = 0.01) loci 31 .

APRI was a modestly significant predictor of treatment response with an AUROC of 0.76 (p = 0.009).

In contrast, only 20 of the unique 497 coexpression hubs were ASD candidates; this represented a modestly significant enrichment ( p < 0.01).

Similarly, as cases had a slightly higher average EBV load, we checked results for enrichment of genes known to be associated with EBV copy number, 34 and found modestly significant statistical evidence for enrichment (1.2% vs 0.6%, P =0.01).

Both Foxo3a and 5hmC on gene bodies showed a modestly significant increase in Tet2 −/− versus WT comparing to their bindings on promoters ( P <0.01, unpaired t -test).

NL% was modestly significant for the detection of Japanese stage II/III/IV (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.94; P < 0.01), Japanese stage III/IV (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.99: P < 0.05), and GAP II/III (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.97; P < 0.05).

However, multivariable linear regression involving both age and the intra-individual heart rate changes as independent variables showed that age was the main determinant of nHF changes (p < 0.001 in all comparisons) with only modestly significant influence of heart rate changes in test 1 (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03 for females and males, respectively) and with no significant influence of heart rate changes in test 2. 4 Discussion The study provides two potentially unexpected observations.

However, for processing speed, the WMH × NHB interaction was modestly significant ( β = −0.06; 95% CI −0.10 to −0.01; p = 0.01), whereas the WMH × Hispanic interaction was not significant ( β = −0.01; 95% CI −0.05 to 0.03; p = 0.69).

About 44% of the DNE1 targets had 3′ UTR lengths ≥ 350 nt, and this was modestly significant ( P < 0.01, as determined by the Fisher’s exact test) compared with nontargets (35%; Fig. 4A ).

The path from Trust to Perceived Legitimacy was modestly significant ( β = 0.225, p = 0.011), supporting H4 for DCOs.

However, rs6187644 genotype showed a modestly significant protective effect in the dominant model (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.32–0.88, p = 0.013).

1 e dashed polygons) and is modestly significant (PERMANOVA pseudo F-ratios: R 2 = 0.12, p = 0.014), demonstrating by-mound variation that is not impinged by batch effects.

In ALS‐only analysis, there were modestly significant associations with disease duration for estrone in males ( R = 0.14, p ‐value = 0.018), 11‐ketotestosterone in females ( R = −0.25, p ‐value < 0.001), and 11‐hydroxyandrostenedione in females ( R = −0.27, p ‐value < 0.001) (Figure S6 ).

Although our data support the conclusion that modulators of the UPR pathway are chronically impacted in this tumor type, aside from a modestly significant increase in BiP in the NSCLC diagnostic group with increasing age (p = 0.0187), we found no obvious correlation with any histopathological criteria such as gender, pathologic stage, histological type, or TMN-status and the increased expression of eIF2α, phospho-eIF2α, and BiP.