Excerpts

Even for the non-validated genes a marginal significance was seen (p = 0,0263).

Interestingly, a highly significant association was found between the percentages of CD4 + T cell in blood and those in the GI tract at baseline (filled circles; r = 0.7252, P = 0.0270, Figure 2E ) and after eight months of therapy (open circles; r = 0.7349, p = 0.0241, Figure 2E ), thus indicating that a common mechanism regulate the levels of CD4+ T cells in these two compartments.

Consistent with the pharmacokinetic experiment, we observed an association between plasma dexamethasone concentration and asparaginase activity (P = 0.005; S1 Fig ) at the end of 6 weeks in the osteonecrosis experiment, In the 27 mice that received both dexamethasone and asparaginase, there was a significant trend towards higher dexamethasone levels (P = 0.027; Fig 4A ) and higher asparaginase activity (P = 0.036; Fig 4B ) in osteonecrosis-positive cases.

Moreover positive correlation for miR-106b and a considerable trend toward significance in case of miR-19a was noted in relation to EZH2 expression (r = 0.36, p = 0.027 and r = 0.32, p = 0.054 respectively) what altogether indicated for miR-17/92 and miR-106/25 cluster families as significant for PFA ependymal tumors ( Fig 4 ).

However, in session 2 the result showed a trend (i.e. 39/60, 65%, p = 0.027, corrected α = 0.025) indicating that participants were able to discern above chance the stimulation condition administered.

The maximum activation of corrugator activity toward Sad faces subtracted from the activation toward Neutral ones in the spontaneous condition showed only marginal significance (p = .027, r = -.519).

The effect of water-filled hopper is only marginally significant in the final model (p = 0.027), so the emphasis on this result feels overstated. 2.

Test number was only marginally significant ( F 7,49 = 2.53, P = 0.027) and there was no statistically significant interaction between test number and feed treatment ( Fig 4 ).

Although the Impulsivity x Task Version x Deck selection interaction can be considered only marginally significant ( F (3,468) = 3.56, η 2 = 0.02, p = 0.027, see Figure 4 ) after the p -level correction (significance threshold: p = 0.008), it did help in qualifying the Impulsivity x Deck Selection interaction.

When PRS calculation was restricted to BD variants with genome-wide significance ( p -value threshold 5×10 −8 ), the PRS of BD cases from the two Cuban families showed a nominally significant increase compared to the PRS of family members with no psychiatric disorder or a non-BD psychiatric phenotype ( p = 0.027, S2B Fig ).

In Mixed Ancestry individuals, who were successfully genotyped for both the GSTT1 and GSTT2B deletions, 13 of 414 controls (0.031) and 16 of 217 cases (0.074) were homozygous for both deletions (genotype Del-Del / Del-Del ), which was a marginally significant difference (p = 0.027).

Despite differences that did not reach statistical significance in the case of CD83 , CCL3 and LIPA , gene expression modulation in eosinophils from asthmatic patients is statistically (p = 0.0279, Spearman r = 0.7857) similar to our observation using microarrays, as evidenced by a correlation analysis between the two sets of data (fold changes obtained with Agilent microarrays vs . fold change calculated by RT-qPCR, data not shown).

A highly significant association was found between HPV positive (+) tumors and CIMP-high group ( P = 0.028).

Correlation analyses revealed only a near-significant negative relationship between age and word reading accuracy (r = -0.55, p = 0.028) suggesting that younger children may benefit more from Sound it Out .

Patients produced reduced output relative to controls, demonstrated in their performance on fluency tasks and spoken picture description (CJT: 53.3%) On the picture description test, patients produced fewer words altogether (p = .006) and proportionately fewer nouns (p = .005), while the difference also approached significance with respect to verbs (p = .028).

In contrast, spinal manipulation participants did not show a significant change to accuracy, although they showed a trend to increase accuracy pre-motor training vs. post-motor training [χ 2 (1) = 4.844, P = 0.028] ( Fig 6 ).

1A ) although only nominally significant with the total hip BMD measure (p = 0.028).

The parameter estimate associated with the interaction term was nominally significant (-0.13 ± 0.06, P = 0.028), suggesting that the joint effect of risk variants at the two variants was not linear.

Similar but marginally significant association of R553W (rs755537970) variant was observed in combined samples with triglycerides (β 0.51± 0.23; p = 0.028).

Postural training and vestibular stimulation With respect to the training-stance session, following EVS, significant/quasi-significant Time effects could be observed only for 95% ellipse (F(4,48) = 2.974, p = 0.028) and CoP velocity (F(4,48) = 3.889, p = 0.06), when recorded in unipedal stance.

cfDNA levels were only significantly correlated with INR at the prehospital time point (with a borderline significant p- value of 0.048), and with PTT ratio at the in-hospital time point ( p = 0.028).

A moderately significant difference in temperature was observed between patients with RSV coinfections and patients with RSV single-infections (χ2 = 4.825, P = 0.028).

There was a significant trend over time in the rate at which women seroconverted (p-value = 0.0283), and this is graphically illustrated in Figure 3 .

The multiple regression model of soil δ 15 N which included soil depth was highly significant ( R 2 = 0.23, P = 0.0285, N = 38), and showed a negative and positive relationship between soil δ 15 N and stand age ( t -ratio = −2.07, F -ratio = 4.29, P -value = 0.0459) and depth ( t -ratio = 2.25, F -ratio = 5.08, P -value = 0.0307), respectively, and no significant interaction (although see Figure 6 for trend).

Nonetheless, we are cautious in making strong inferences from the total reading data because: i) the observed effect was numerically small in magnitude; ii) only two-thirds of the participants showed this advantage in total reading times; and iii) the effect did not reach the significance level in the item-analysis –note that the effect was barely significant (p = .029) when using a linear mixed model analysis for this comparison; and iv) the effect did not occur for total reading times or gaze durations at the local (word) level.