Excerpts

Proportions of nonclassical monocytes were lower amongst this higher income bracket with lower intermediate monocytes trending towards significance [nonclassical fold change -5.23 (95%CI -8.94 to -1.53), p = 0.006; intermediate -1.91 (-3.91 to 0.10), p = 0.063].

The differences were highly significant between the groups; B and S ( p = 0.006), T and S ( p = 0.005) and B and T ( p = 0.001).

However, The main effect of distractor type was found highly significant, F 1 (2,100) = 5.4, p = .006, η 2 p = .09; F 2 (2,158) = 4.17, p = .01, showing participants were significantly slower at launching a saccade towards the target in the referent competitor condition (551.59 ms, SE = 12.9) and the translation cohort competitor condition (552.16ms, SE = 13.2) than in the condition when the target was accompanied by unrelated distractors (533.14ms, SE = 13.2)(See S1 Dataset ).

The second GWAS SNP, rs12425791, was only borderline significant based on our threshold of one expected false discovery (HR = 1.31, p = 0.006).

The rs714939 SNP was also the only marker that showed a trend for association with PIQ (P = 0.006).

In the current study, tumor size was also found to have a marginal significance in multivariate analysis (HR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.28–4.36; P = 0.006).

‘Howling’ frequency differentiated Group 2 from Group 1 at T24, and the difference between Groups 2 and 3 approached significance ( p = 0.006– Table 3 ).

Patients performed significantly worse than controls and relatives in the Random condition (Tukey’s HSD, p values < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 1.12), significantly worse than relatives in the Orthogonal condition (Tukey’s HSD, p = 0.041, Cohen’s d = 0.68), and showed a trend toward poorer Orthogonal performance versus controls that did not survive correction for multiple comparisons (uncorrected p = 0.006, Cohen’s d = 0.50).

The trend test for the dose-response relationship was highly significant (p = 0.006).

There was a highly significant interaction between OPV at birth and sex (p = 0.006).

The inter-individual comparison in PD patients between the clinical dominant and non-dominant side showed a highly significant difference of the grey value vessel ratio for veins ( p -value = 0.0060): The non-dominant side showed a lower contrast in veins compared to the dominant side.

Similarly, UbC and MC1 driven expression also showed significantly higher expression when positioned in the sense orientation, although the effect was barely significant (p = 0.006 and p = 0.007, respectively) relative to the 0.006 p-value threshold obtained after adjusting for multiple comparisons.

Postoperative stays were significantly longer in the low-SMI group in men, but this difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.006).

They indicated a highly significant enhancement of performance for the symbolic group, t (51) = 3.33; p = .006, η 2 = 0.178, but not for the non-symbolic, t (51) = 0.45; ns, η 2 = 0.005, or control, t (51) = 0.23; ns, η 2 = 0.001, groups.

Highly significant associations were found between all genotypes and serum concentration of MASP-1(P = 0.006), MASP-3(P < 0.0001), and MAp44 (P < 0.0001).

so the test includes just cut-marked, percussion marked and tooth marked specimens) the effect of instrumentation assistance type on correspondence in identifying bone surface modifications is still highly significant (Mann-Whitney U = 4.5, z = −2.74, p = 0.006).

Most owners (890/926, 96%) believed that obesity could cause risks to a dog’s health, but a significant trend existed ( P = 0.006) whereby more owners disagreed about the health risks as weight status increased from ideal weight (12/480, 2%), to overweight (14,317, 4%), to obese (10/129, 8%).

The overall differentiation between the phenotypes was highly significant (L, M1, M2 and M3, H; Fst=0.2335, P=0.0062; Table 3 ), whereas no significant differentiation was detected between any of the pairs of phenotypes (Fst ≥0.0379, P ≥0.1168; Table 3 ).

Clear differences in ELOVL6 expression were observed among samples in all tissues, with a highly significant effect of sex in liver (p-value = 6.5×10 −03 ), backfat (p-value = 3.4×10 −04 ) and muscle (p-value = 3.4×10 −05 ), where ELOVL6 gene expression was higher in females than in males.

We also found a negative trend for an association between SN-DMN coupling and WM task percent correct (PC, r = -0.5197, p = 0.0065) ( Fig 4b ); as the SN-DMN coupling increased, the participant responded more incorrectly.

We observed a highly significant increase in the frequency of naïve CD8+ T cells (T NAIVE ) in the LTS-NS subjects (p = 0.0066), compared to the LTS-SS subjects, but no differences in any other CD8+ T cell subsets.

Within the study cohort, the favorable impact of dMMR ( vs pMMR) on OS was of borderline statistical significance after adjustment for covariates (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.22 to 1.11; P = .064), but was highly significant in the parent cohort (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.89; P = .0066).

The difference between arms was highly significant (p = 0.0069).

The paired t-test analysis of levels CRP during the first three weeks of hospitalization showed a decreasing trend in CRP levels during hospitalization ( Fig 3 ), with a significant decrease in CRP levels in the first week compared to the third week (P = 0.007). 4.

Late 2010/early 2011 inventories and MAR were compared to late 2011 and 2012 inventories and MAR with a student’s T test and differences between the two time periods were highly significant, p = 0.007 for MAR and p = 0.0018 for inventories ( Table 3 ).