Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,910 sentences · 1 filter applied

a significant trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
In this study, there was a significant trend to decrease the VE•VCO 2 −1 slope after BJ intake compared with the PL ( p = 0.06) during both routines although the VE•VCO 2 −1 slope only declined significantly with a rest between exercises coinciding with improvements in FS performance (first routine).
a strong trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Aside from a strong trend ( p = 0.06) indicating improved visual–spatial memory performance for male participants, we found no gender effect for the other outcomes; executive abilities ( p = 0.34), lexical access ( p = 0.37), verbal memory ( p = 0.90), memory interference ( p = 0.64), and depressive symptoms ( p = 0.32).
borderline significancep = 0.0601.2× alpha
Results: Partial correlation analysis controlled for BMI and age showed a significant correlation between ImP and diastolic blood pressure (r s = 0.285, p = 0.004) and a borderline significance with systolic blood pressure (r s = 0.187, p = 0.060); however, systolic and diastolic blood pressure did not correlate with ImP precursor histidine (r s = 0.063, p = 0.526 and r = −0.038, p = 0.712, respectively).
approached significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
A significant increase in the servings of vegetables per day was observed in the txt4two cohort, compared with the PC cohort, 0.9 (±1.2) versus 0.1 (±0.7) ( p = 0.03.) The proportion of women meeting the vegetable guidelines between groups over time approached significance ( p = 0.06; Table 2 ).
marginally significantp ≤ 0.061.2× alphagold
With the addition of BMI, Step 2 was marginally significant, ΔR 2 = 0.04, F(2, 82) = 11.88, p ≤ 0.06, such that greater BMI was associated with greater SDRT, with BMI accounting for a marginal incremental amount of variance in incongruent RT variability beyond the associated descriptive variables, β = 0.19, t (82) = 1.93, p = 0.006.
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Results : At 12 months, there was a marginally significant decrease in ApoB (mean change: −7.17 mg/dL; 95% CI: −14.4, 0.12; p = 0.06), while no significant changes were observed for ApoA1 (mean change: −1.28 mg/dL; 95% CI: 12.33, 9.76; p = 0.80), ApoE (mean change: +0.12 mg/dL; 95% CI: −0.27, 0.52; p = 0.51), CK (mean change: +13.19 U/L; 95% CI: −32.72, 59.11; p = 0.55), Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (mean change: −0.44; 95% CI: −1.11, 0.22; p = 0.17), and HOMA-β (mean change: +45.62; 95% CI: −95.6, 186.9; p = 0.50).