Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,163 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally non-significantp < 0.081.6× alpha
The amount of overlap in the top n genes was statistically significantly higher than expected for three species pairs, and marginally non-significant ( p < 0.08) for an additional two species pairs, such that we found some evidence of non-random overlap for 5/6 species pairs (Supplementary Table 9 ).
showed a trendp = 0.081.6× alpha
Consistently, HPLC determination of 5-HT levels in spinal cord extracts showed a trend toward higher caudal-to-rostral 5-HT concentrations in bPAC animals compared to control (0.51 ± 0.27vs.0.14 ± 0.11 μM/mg protein, respectively; p = 0.08, Mann–Whitney test, Fig. 5G ).
borderline significantP =0.081.6× alphagold
These profound individual changes were, however, masked by remarkable within-state variation among the other subjects so that the average group-level fold change following the intervention was moderate and only borderline significant (log 10 FC=−0.39; P =0.08; paired Wilcoxon test).
a positive trendp = 0.081.6× alphagold
We then stratified the analysis of TMB across the eligible tumor types and found significant associations with ICB response in melanoma and NSCLC (melanoma: 1.5-fold, Welch’s two-tailed t test p = 2.0 × 10 −5 ; NSCLC: 2.5-fold, p = 0.003) and a positive trend amongst bladder and head and neck tumors (bladder: 1.9-fold, Welch’s two-tailed t test p = 0.08; head and neck: 1.1-fold, p = 0.94) (Fig. 1e ).
marginally significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
Regression analysis showed that there was a marginally significant interaction between total life events and percent time spent in institutions on externalizing problems at age 16, B = 0.003, 95% CI [0.00, 0.01], β = 0.18, p = 0.08, and a significant interaction between the number of independent events and percent time in institutions on externalizing problems, B = 0.006, 95% CI [0.001, 0.01], β = 0.25, p = 0.01.
marginally significantP = 0.081.6× alphagold
Interestingly, while none of the individual genes from the signature reached statistical significance when stroma surrounding benign glands in the prostates bearing high-Gleason and low-Gleason cancers was compared (sB.high-sB.low), the difference in ssGSEA scores for this comparison was marginally significant (Fig. 4b ; t -test, P = 0.08).
marginally significantp = 0.0811.6× alphagold
While the subperiod-average percentage of the population >65 years only appeared as a marginally significant predictor (likelihood ratio test, p = 0.081) in the second-stage meta-regression (Supplementary Table 3 ), it is still conceivable that our estimates of the climate-change attributable death burden in Germany are biased by ignoring age-group-specific temperature-mortality associations.