However, no significant difference was apparent between the BMP-2 and the sham groups ( p > 0.05), indicating that BMP-2 alone did not significantly enhance osteogenesis ( Figure 4 A).
Excerpts
The significance of each factor on the response value was evaluated using the p -value: p < 0.01 indicates a highly significant effect; 0.01 < p < 0.05 indicates a significant effect; and p > 0.05 indicates no significant effect [ 27 ]. 2.3.3.
This behavior is in full agreement with the ANOVA results: B demonstrates extremely high significance ( p = 0.000053), while A is only marginally significant ( p = 0.0526).
ABS–A reduction in strength of −2.9 MPa, with a trend close to significance ( p = 0.0529).
borderline significancep = 0.053
In the case of the cylindrical grid, a borderline significance was obtained compared with the control ( p = 0.053).
Foot Kinematics As shown in Figure 5 , the peak ankle dorsiflexion demonstrated marginal significance (χ 2 (3) = 7.68, Kendell’s W = 0.256, p = 0.053).
almost significantlyp < 0.054
Moreover, the control was almost significantly different from the reference treatment (soil with lime) (K-W, p < 0.054), while there was no difference between the reference and the ashes.
The difference of fracture resistance between the three groups was marginally significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, p = 0.054), with the ASC zirconia abutment tending to have higher fracture resistance than the full zirconia abutment.
borderline significancep = 0.054
Moreover, there was a borderline significance, as the μTBS of permanent teeth sealed with non-bonded Bio-RBS (Group 5) was higher than primary teeth sealed with bonded RBS ( p = 0.054).
Micro-CT Analysis There is a borderline significant difference between the groups (CP-Ti and Ti6Al4V-ELI) over time with a mean difference over time of 5.58 (CI −0.15–11.3, p = 0.055) for BVi, and no significant difference for BVo with a mean difference over time of 3.54 (CI −5.18–12.3, p = 0.399).
nearly reached significancep = 0.0550
In addition, a nearly reached significance ( p = 0.0550) was observed between P400 and P4000 groups.
The effect of the process temperature on the weight of the gas secreted out was also close to being significant ( p = 0.05510).
Within Material B, this relationship was moderate and borderline significant (r = −0.619, p = 0.056).
However, BI is on the threshold of significance ( p = 0.058).
A strong trend for a lower wear rate for the asymptomatic cohort compared to the symptomatic cohort was observed (p = 0.059).
borderline non-significantp = 0.06
The meta-analysis of the in vivo studies indicated that calcium-hydroxide powder/saline promotes reparative bridge formation better than the popular commercial resin-free calcium-silicate cement Pro-Root MTA (Dentsply-Sirona), although the difference was borderline non-significant ( p = 0.06), and better than calcium-hydroxide cements ( p < 0.0001).
It was found that application of CaOH for 24 h resulted in a decrease by 3.9 log-counts of cells that colonized the canal walls directly, which was significantly not different from the results obtained for the chloramine-T PP group ( p = 0.065).
The ANCOVA results revealed statistically significant differences between groups, with a high effect size (F (2,41) = 177.04 [ p < 0.001]; η 2 p = 0.90), and almost significant results for preload, with a moderate effect size (F (1,41) = 3.53 [ p = 0.068]; η 2 p = 0.08).
Force is also statistically significant ( p -value = 0.027), while feed rate shows marginal significance ( p -value = 0.068).
borderline significancep = 0.07
However, observed differences had only borderline significance ( p = 0.07) ( Figure 4 A).
When evaluating deformation variability similar trends were noted: the difference between Group 2D and Groups 1A and 1B proved statistically significant ( p = 0.01 *), while it was only weakly significant in relation to Group 1C ( p = 0.07).
Cadmium showed a tendency toward significance (F(11) = 11.03, p = 0.08), while lead did not differ significantly between treatments (F(11) = 4.6, p = 0.58).
Compared to the controls, a significant ( p < 0.05) height loss was found with damaged IVDs under dynamic loading, and a strong trend in height loss ( p = 0.097) was seen with damaged IVDs under static loading ( Figure 3 b).
A higher threshold (marginal significance, p < 0.10) was considered when the sample size was 10 or lower. 3.
The regression model p -value < 0.0001 indicates that the model is highly significant; at p > 0.1, the model is not significant [ 41 ].