Excerpts

AISI showed a borderline significant negative association with DMFT ( β = −0.001, 95% CI −0.001 to 0.010, p = 0.0496), while SIRI, SII, NEU, IIC, and NLR showed similar negative trends with p -values between 0.05 and 0.10.

Similar results were obtained in the CIMA-CUN cohort ( n = 95 cases); however, in this case, a tendency toward significance ( p = 0.12) for RFS and a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.0499) for OS were observed ( Figure S1A,B, Supplementary Materials ).

This result was borderline significant ( p = 0.05), and therefore should be interpreted with caution, as it may reflect a trend rather than a definitive difference.

10.3%), but it did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.05).

In CMML, ASXL1 and TET2 mutations were associated with a trend toward better prognosis compared with wild-type (HR 0.21, p = 0.052; HR 0.25, p = 0.057, respectively), while U2AF1 mutations were associated with adverse prognosis in univariate analysis with borderline significance (HR 12.20, p = 0.050).

Although MP-CMML showed a trend toward inferior survival, pairwise comparisons between subtypes did not reach statistical significance (all p > 0.05). 3.3.2.

In these adjusted analyses, the higher prevalence of malignancy in cLP-only patients remained significant compared with oLP-only patients (adjusted OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.45–5.04; p = 0.002) and LPP-only patients (adjusted OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.07–3.31; p = 0.028), with borderline significance compared with gLP-only patients (adjusted OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.00–7.35; p = 0.050).

From the meta-analysis, the difference between patients and controls was highly significant at Workload@VT (overall mean: −10.8 at Test 1 vs. −33.0 at Test 2, p < 0.05), which may reflect present the functional impairment associated with PEM.

The concordance rate was 63.3%, and the difference was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.05).

Length of hospital stay showed a borderline significant trend favoring PPF (11.00 ± 6.99 vs. 16.27 ± 13.03 days, p = 0.05).

While the use of corticosteroids showed a borderline significant benefit (MD = 1.34, 95% CI: 0.01–2.67, p = 0.05), ALA supplementation did not significantly enhance olfactory recovery (MD = 0.50, 95% CI: −0.07–1.07, p = 0.08).

Other near-significant results, such as for FD_AP in Trial 2ec ( p = 0.05, r = −0.28) and FD_AP in Trial 2eo ( p = 0.06, r = −0.27), also hint at increased complexity in sway among addicted individuals, though they did not meet conventional significance thresholds.

After adjustment for gestational age and birth weight, the risk of ventilatory support was borderline significant for Group 2 (adjusted OR 3.06; 95% CI 1.00–9.37; p = 0.05) versus Group 1 (reference).

Moreover, in the multivariate analysis, the time to intervention reached only borderline significance with an OR of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.99) and p = 0.05.

Longer REM sleep duration showed a similar trend, although marginally non-significant (B = −0.02; OR = 0.98; p = 0.05), implying that REM architecture may modulate bruxism expression, potentially through its effect on arousal thresholds and muscle activation.

This protective effect was particularly pronounced in patients with HFrEF, where OMT compliance was associated with a 38% risk reduction compared with no OMT (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39–0.98, p = 0.04), and showed a borderline significant association in HFpEF (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34–1.00, p = 0.05), but not in HFmrEF (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.36–1.15, p = 0.14).

Supervised combined exercise programs showed a borderline significant reduction in BMI (SMD −1.25; 95% CI: −2.50 to 0.01; p = 0.05; I 2 = 59%), based on 3 studies with 23 patients.

Based on these findings, the null hypothesis—stating that attachment orientation does not affect the rotational accuracy—cannot be fully rejected in the overall model, the findings should be interpreted as indicative of a trend toward improved rotational control with oblique crescent-shaped attachments rather than definitive superiority, given the borderline significance ( p = 0.05) and the moderate effect size (d = 0.5) observed.

Specifically, for the mNUTRIC score, the pooled risk associations for both 28-day and ICU mortality remained stable and highly significant ( p < 0.05) in all iterations, despite the exclusion of individual datasets.

There were significant correlations between BMI reduction and increase of SDNN-I (r = 0.281, p = 0.04; Figure 2 ) and also nearly significant correlations for increase of SDNN (r = 0.267, p = 0.05) and SDANN (r = 0.256, p = 0.07).

The AUC of the Inception-ResNet-v2 (AUC 0.876 (95% CI 0.873–0.879)) was higher than the AUC of the worst performing endoscopist with a marginal significance (AUC 0.723 (95% CI 0.662–0.779), p = 0.05). 3.4.

In the univariate analyses, the degree of DFA stenosis was a significant predictor for major amputation ( p = 0.04) and a borderline significant predictor of improvement of the ankle brachial index ( p = 0.05).

The difference between CeD patients and controls was highly significant ( p < 0.05).

One study reported that IPSS-R outperformed IPSS in predicting OS [ 44 ], with a C-index of 0.74 ( p < 0.001), and showed borderline significant superiority over WPSS ( p = 0.05), although no significant differences were found for PFS prediction.

The difference in delta pre-/post-ER (after 24 months) between the two states of the teres minor, regardless of prior surgery, was highly significant at 7.7° (unpaired t -test, p < 0.05).