Excerpts

Association was significant in 10 of 21 in χ 2 –appropriate items (Bonferroni-P < 0.002), and the ordinal items had highly significant correlations between formats (Bonferroni-P < 0.0125).

The correlation between the HFA values and the 60′ VEP IT values was near significance ( p = 0.0129), and this can suggest that the neural conduction along the large axons might also contribute to the reduced HFA MD. 4.2.

The overall in-hospital mortality in SAH patients in 2009–2019 was 36.5% ( n = 735), and an increasing trend was observed (Cochran–Armitage trend test: p = 0.013) ( Figure 4 ).

Furthermore, the Chopart joint of the affected foot showed a trend towards reduced frontal plane ROM during the loading response ( p = 0.013) and a trend towards an increased ROM during the midstance phase ( p = 0.03).

In addition, MSHQ-Bother scores showed a decreasing trend over time, reaching statistical significance at 12 months ( p = 0.013), reflecting a reduction in patients’ bother related to ejaculatory issues.

Rugg has proven a highly significant correlation between the prevalence of OM and smoking during and/or after the conditioning regimen ( p = 0.014) [ 32 ].

Although the effect tends to decrease over the years, it remains highly significant 30 years later (a reduction of 30% compared to conventional treatment; p = 0.016) [ 12 , 13 ].

Moreover, a highly significant reduction was observed for all patients ( p = 0.016).

Second, IL-5 levels have been investigated only in a few studies, and one of these studies described an increase in IL5 levels for patients with advanced disease that reached borderline significance ( p = 0.017) and showed a large overlap between patients with advanced and less severe CRS [ 24 ] Third, as indicated in Table 1 the levels of Ang-1, Ang-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are altered in patients advanced CRS; these effects alterations are not caused by a difference in

The interaction between group and mPDMS-2 at baseline (T0) was still highly significant ( p = 0.017).

While there was a negative trend for lower PFS for all five parameters, the association reached statistical significance in patients with higher ECOG status (HR: 1.401, p = 0.017) and patients with an increase of 10% or higher at the fourth-week follow-up (HR: 1.544, p = 0.004) ( Table 3 ).

A lack of an association between each SNP and MIH was found in analyses performed for frequency distributions of major homozygotes, heterozygotes, and minor homozygotes (except for the rs4811117 polymorphism, for which the p -value reached marginal significance at p = 0.017, which is on the borderline if the Bonferroni-corrected significance level of p = 0.05/3 = 0.017 is used for the global chi-squared test with the further tests treated as post-hoc tests).

The trend of increases in plasma S1P with complications is further detailed in Table 5 , where they were all significantly higher than in patients without complications, with an increasing trend from ophthalmopathy ( p = 0.018), neuropathy ( p = 0.007), nephropathy ( p = 0.004), and mixed complications ( p < 0.001).

Differences were clearly significant between groups GBOPT and GCC ( p = 0.018, Chi 2 test) but not between groups GS and GCC ( p = 0.215, Chi 2 test), or between groups GS and GBOPT ( p = 0.260, Chi 2 test).

On univariate analysis, there were only a minority of factors that, taken alone, may be responsible for recommendation disagreement: when comparing the HT-indicated PCI cohort with the GPT-indicated PCI (theoretical) cohort ( Table 3 ), the only barely significant differences were a slightly lower ejection fraction in the HT group (51 ± 10% vs. 56 ± 7%, p = 0.020) and a higher prevalence of hypertension (95.2% vs. 82.9%, p = 0.047).

For NT discordance, a nominally significant interaction term was identified ( p = 0.020); however, this result should be interpreted with caution given the small number of NT-positive MCDA cases ( n = 3) and model non-convergence, precluding reliable subgroup-specific estimates.

There was a nominally significant ( p = 0.02) difference between APOE ɛ4 carriers as compared with non-carriers in brainstem volume, which did not remain after FDR adjustment. 3.5.

Thereafter, the plasma levels of mtDNA in the patient group continued to increase compared with those of the control group (t 72 ), but did not reach statistical significance (controls: 65 (28–119) copies/μL; patients: 281 (110–805) at t 0 , 403 (168–1937) at t 24 and 467 (188–952) copies/μL at t 72 ; controls vs. patients: p = 0.02 at t 0 , p = 0.03 at t 24 and p = 0.44 at t 72 ; Figure 1 B).

There was a highly significant difference in total SNOT 22 score between the patients listed for Draf 2 (mean score 45.6) and those listed for Draf 3 (mean score 59) ( p = 0.02).

Among endothelial cell morphology indices, only lower hexagonality at 6 months after penetrating keratoplasty showed a suggestive trend of higher graft failure ( p = 0.02) [ 67 ].

However, the AC estimates did not significantly differ between the two groups at T2 in any of the selected regions, albeit there was a slight trend in the RH_Cont_PFCl_3 (F (1,17) = 8.61, p = 0.02, uncorrected for multiple comparisons).

Even the combined-endpoint favorable ventricular remodeling associated with functional improvement ( Figure 2 , Table 4 ) showed a favorable trend (log rank test p = 0.02) in non-ischemic patients, not reaching the statistical significance after adjusting for age and sex (HR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.02–1.49; p = 0.109).

This association remained nominally significant after adjustment for maternal age at first delivery (adjusted β = −0.2679 weeks, 95% CI: −0.4948 to −0.0410, p = 0.021).

Initially, univariate logistic regression identified several variables with either statistical significance or borderline significance. These included hormone receptor status ( p = 0.021), HER2 status ( p = 0.007), tumor size (T stage, p = 0.058), clinical stage (stage II vs.

In addition, in men, there was a significant trend in the distribution of mean glutathione values ( p = 0.021).