Excerpts

Concerning the Stroop interference, the effect of time was borderline significant (F = 2.97, p = 0.089), whereas the effects of the group (F = 4.43, p = 0.039) and of the interaction of time and group (F = 17.31, p < 0.001) resulted in statistically significant differences.

Vaccination status in Model IV showed a strong trend regarding the odds of being healthy for children with a vaccination card (OR = 0.50, p -value = 0.089).

We decided post hoc to also study whether this difference would reflect a significant decrease, and found that it just failed to reach statistical significance ( p = 0.089), while in the waitlist group, the mean (SD) increase of 0.4 (14.8) points was not statistically significant ( p = 0.93).

We then used backwards elimination regression modeling and eliminated all non-significant (statistically significant if p ≤ 0 .05 from the Wald statistic) interactions from t he initial model (the interaction with home smoke rule was borderline significant in the final model p = 0.09 but was retained because it was significant in some iterations of the model) and then one-by-one eliminated each of the non-significant main effects whose removal did not cause the beta coefficients of the other variables in the model to change.

A trend towards significance was observed for VO 2 peak ( p = 0.09).

In addition, the Vuong–Lo–Mendell–Rubin adjusted likelihood ratio test (VLMR-LRT) p-value indicated a borderline significant model fit improvement comparing a 3-class model with a 2-class model when using the conventional alpha of 0.05 ( p -value = 0.09).

A marginally significant exposure × side interaction (F 1,16 = 3.249, p = 0.090, η 2 p = 0.169) was found but post hoc analysis did not indicate that exposure would have differently affected the left or the right side ( p > 0.35 in all comparisons, the greater MD = −1.009).

Gender was a marginally significant factor for depression ( r = 0.04, p = 0.09).

Marginally significant results (0.05 < p < 0.09) were presented following Altman’s [ 59 ] suggestion to present such results when they appear clinically important.

Additionally, moderate-intensity activities had a negative association with loneliness scores, but the difference was close to significance ( p = 0.09).

When examining current exposures to at least one solvent and asthma symptom score ( Table S3 ), significant and borderline significant ( p = 0.09) associations were observed with both self-report and JEM in men and women. 3.4.

Furthermore, there were marginally significant differences in vital exhaustion at pretest ( t (15.72) = −1.77, p = 0.09, d = 0.54) with lower scores for remainders ( M = 4.29, SD = 3.59) versus the dropouts ( M = 6.67, SD = 5.04), but not significant differences in symptoms of depression ( t < 1.00).

Two-way mixed design ANOVA models showed a trend towards a significant interaction in the maximum power of the 30 s rowing test (F = 3.259, p = 0.090), while no significant interaction in other outcomes of the rowing test was observed (i.e., the average power (F = 0.571, p = 0.461), the distance (F = 0.330, p = 0.573), and the predicted time of rowing 500 m (F = 0.272, p = 0.609)) ( Table 2 ).

In addition, a certain trend toward significance ( p = 0.09) was seen in that smokers who had experienced pre-existing quit attempts were more likely to be a successful quitter (OR 2.3, 95% CI (0.9–6.2).

Borderline significant associations for high ( vs. low) job strain in the group with domestic overload were also observed for sleep systolic BP (16.9 mm Hg, p = 0.09), 24 h diastolic BP (12.9 mm Hg, p = 0.055), home diastolic BP (13.6 mm Hg, p = 0.07) and sleep systolic BP (20.5 mm Hg, p = 0.082).These findings suggest the existence of interaction between domestic overload and stress at work since much smaller (and non-significant) differences in mean BP due to high job strain were observed for workers with low domestic workload.

Fecal Propionate RS effect overall: Propionate concentrations were significantly increased in the HAMS period ( p < 0.001) and to a lesser degree in the HAMSA period ( p = 0.03) ( Table 2 , Figure 2 ), although the difference between HAMS and HAMSA did not quite reach significance ( Table 2 , p = 0.09).

Finally, a Tukey post hoc test on the affiliative humor style revealed marginally significant mean differences between noninvolved students ( M adj = 5.55, SE = 0.12) and victims ( M adj = 4.96, SE = 0.26; M diff = 0.59; SE diff = 0.28, t (2) = 2.13, p = 0.09, d = 0.51).

However, within the compliant group, a paired samples t -test indicated a decreasing trend that nearly reached significance ( p = 0.09) was observed in HbA1c levels, which went from 8.19 ± 1.25% to 7.84 ± 1.13% after receiving a summary of results in the form of daily activity and glucose graphs.

Age (χ 2 (1) = 6.37, p = 0.01), mother’s education level (χ 2 (3) = 9.25, p = 0.03) were significant variables, and months spent with sports was marginally significant (χ 2 (1) = 2.98, p = 0.09).

Contrasting the two groups against non-medicated children showed a marginal significance (z = −1.7, p = 0.09) ( Table 4 ).

The results showed that boys had higher proficiency in total FMS and object control skills than girls (SMD = 0.17 (95% CI 0.03, 0.31), p = 0.02; SMD = 0.48 (95% CI 0.38, 0.58), p < 0.00001), and gender differences in locomotor skill proficiency approached significance, trending in favor of girls (SMD = −0.07 (95 % CI −0.15, 0.01), p = 0.09, I 2 = 66%).

The moderating effect of gender on the relationship between mindfulness and cognitive reappraisal was marginally significant ( b = −0.02, p = 0.09).

The SCD inconsistency-by-LSS interaction was significant in predicting the interest towards sexual exploration (F = 8.183, p < 0.01), as well as marginally significant in predicting solitary OSAs (F = 2.94, p = 0.09).

RS) disclosed a main Cognitive Load effect with better accuracy in the LCL compared to the HCL condition ( F (1, 13) = 34.30, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.73), a main Segment effect with decreased performance starting at the second segment ( F (3, 39) = 14.41, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.53), and a weak trend towards a main Condition effect with higher accuracy in the RS compared to the SF condition ( F (1, 13) = 3.42, p = 0.09; η p 2 = 0.21). 4.

In the traditional frequency-band means, a marginally significant correlation ( r = 0.62) was found between hearing acuity and BMI ( p = 0.09).