Excerpts

Borderline significant results appeared for ‘nausea/dizziness’ ( p = 0.06) and ‘irritated eyes’ ( p = 0.09). 3.5.

Marginally significant increases (tendency) ( p = 0.060) were observed for task-approach goals.

However, there was near significance ( p < 0.06) for PROMIS-D-SF scores of the individual with stroke at T1 predicting PROMIS-D-SF scores of the care partner at T3, with higher scores for individuals with stroke at T1 predicting lower care partner scores at T3.

When the models were controlled for chronological age, MVPA, and SES, only the sum of four skinfolds showed a significant association with the total FMS score (β = −0.03, p < 0.0001), while the coefficient for waist circumference approached significance (β = −0.04, p = 0.06).

Interestingly, conversational recommender users getting popularity-driven information were also 1.5 times more likely to be present at policy-driven attractions (approaching significance at p = 0.06) compared to participants getting popularity-driven information by passive app.

In addition, mentors showed an increasing trend in general for self-efficacy (V = 6.5, p = 0.06; see Figure 8 ), with seven of ten participants demonstrating gains from pre- to post-mentoring. 3.2.3.

Mean Der f 1 levels were significantly higher in homes built before 1990 compared to those built after 1990 (47.61 μg/g versus 10.96 μg/g, p = 0.043; 17.54 μg/m 2 , versus 0.2 μg/m 2 , p = 0.012) A sampling surface of carpet, compared to hardwood, predicted dust weight (1.13 g versus 0.30 g; p < 0.001), but not Der f 1 levels expressed as μg/g ( p > 0.6); carpet sampling surface approached significance as a predictor of Der f 1 levels expressed as μg/m 2 ( p = 0.06).

The ethics program’s scope significantly reduces the frequency of negative feelings (B = −0.38; p < 0.05) but has no impact on the frequency of positive feelings (B = 0.32; p < 0.06; marginally significant) or satisfaction with life (B = 0.04; n.s.) ( Table 3 ).

First, the face and body groups reported significantly greater functional impairment and emotional distress compared with the fingerpicking group (although the difference for emotional distress was only marginally significant from those with primarily body picking, p = 0.06).

Although none of these differences were statistically significant, the difference between groups in the risk of all-cause hospitalization approached significance ( p = 0.060).

The direct effect was marginally significant (estimate = 0.08, SE = 0.04, t = 1.91, p = 0.06, 95% CI: −0.0022, 0.1699). 3.3.

Total caloric intake was marginally significant (p < 0.06) between children of single-parent households (1910 ± 24) and dual-parent households (1,860 ± 25).

In the comparison between the footballers and control groups, the statistically significant differences were found in the following variables: in the BMI (Mann–Whitney = 512.5, p < 0.05), being higher in the footballer than in control condition with a moderate to high effect size, Cohen’s d = 0.65 (r = 0.31); in Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Global score) (Mann–Whitney = 492, p < 0.00), being higher in the footballer than in the control condition with a very high effect size, Cohen’s d = 2.3 (r = 0.75) and marginally significant in the Positive subscale (Mann-Whitney = 607, p = 0.06), being higher in the footballer than in control condition and there was a small to moderate to high effect size, Cohen’s d = 0.48 (r = 0.23); and in the Subscale 1 of the CAP (Mann–Whitney = 547, p < 0.05), being higher in the footballer than in the control condition with a small to moderate to high effect size, Cohen’s d = 0.52 (r = 0.25) ( Table 5 ).

In general, higher SD SBP and ARV SBP were significantly associated with lower mean levels of serum AST and ALT, except a borderline significant association between ARV SBP and mean levels of serum ALT ( p = 0.06).

Due to the small number of participants borderline significant results (p < 0.06) were also retained in the final models and are also presented.

The differences between means in the education variable were near significance ( p = 0.06).

The increase in NE from pre to post ASD approached significance ( p = 0.06).

The results also showed a trend towards a positive effect on craving (SMD = 0.89 (CI: -0.05, 1.82); z = 1.85, p = 0.06)”.

T-tests on mean percentage of CRs acquired block by block confirmed significant differences between blocks 1 and 3 (p = 0.01), blocks 1 and 4 (p = 0.001), blocks 1 and 6 (p = 0.002), and marginal significance between blocks 1 and 5 (p = 0.06) during delay conditioning.

Moreover, a clear trend toward worse sexual satisfaction was observed in this group of patients (domain V; FSFI; p = 0.06).

Patients who reported recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) (17%) achieved significantly lower scores on the FSFI ( p = 0.03), and a trend toward significance was observed ( p = 0.06) in the group of concomitant fungal infections (23%).

Additionally in Step 3, academic motivation had a marginally significant effect on PTG (B = 0.16, p = 0.060).

The intervention and time interaction showed marginal significance (F(1, 139) = 3.51, p = 0.06), suggesting a somewhat different effect of the two interventions for all groups.

However, we found only limited evidence of a dose-response truth® effect on openness to smoking as the difference in the effect between high and medium truth® recall was only marginally significant (p=0.06).

Although not reaching full statistical significance, there was a notable difference of opinion on the effect of smoke between males and females in these three conditions, approaching significance ( p = 0.06 by the Chi-square test). 3.7.