In terms of the malnutrition-risk group, the total MNA score was significantly correlated with the scores on the UPDRS Section 1 ( r = −0.47, p = 0.020) and 2 ( r = −0.47, p = 0.019) and approached significance for the total score ( r = −0.39, p = 0.058) of the UPDRS scale.
The final batch of EMS stations that introduced mechanical CPR showed a trend of lower odds of achievement of any ROSC than in the first batch of EMS stations (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.318–1.020, p = 0.058), but the difference was not statistically significant. 3.3.
Group × Time Interaction: Significant for Resilience ( F (1,58) = 6.16, p = 0.015) and approached significance for Decision-Making Competence ( p = 0.058) and HRV parameters (SDNN, RMSSD, LF/HF ratio) ( p = 0.058) and HRR ( p = 0.061), suggesting a trend toward differential improvements in the experimental group.
Serum IL-6 levels, another inflammatory biomarker, was found to have decreased in a borderline significance manner over the period of the intervention ( p = 0.058) in BR alone group.
For patients with mercury > 1 μg/L, we observed a borderline significant difference between CAL and non-CAL groups ( p = 0.058).
Millennial mothers also had more sugar-sweetened beverages than Generation X mothers (approached significance at p = 0.058, Cohen’s d = 0.39).
The Friedman test revealed marginally significant differences among conditions for “Anger–Hostility” ( p = 0.058) and “Confusion–Bewilderment” ( p = 0.079).
The simple effects analysis indicated that the amplitude of P200 at Fz was greater (marginally significant) than the delayed selection ( p = 0.058) in the group with negative body image at fatness subscale, but not in the control group.
In addition, a marginally significant negative trend between cord serum MBP and cord serum TSH (R = 0.25, p = 0.058), and cord serum MBP and cord serum T 4 (R = 0.23, p = 0.092) was observed ( Table 4 ).
Perceived stress was also almost significantly higher in patients with OSAS (25.29 vs. 20.7 PSS score; p = 0.058).
When examining the integrated effects of age-related factors, statistically speaking, age negatively moderated the negative relationship between the video entertainment app use frequency and emotional loneliness of OAs on a marginally significant level (β = −0.01, p = 0.058) ( Figure 4 ).
Differences between profiles 2 and 4 were marginally significant ( p = 0.058).
A paired-samples t -test indicated that this difference approached significance, t (31) = 1.97, p = 0.058, but did not reach the adjusted significance threshold following Bonferroni correction ( p < 0.01).
One study was of borderline significance ( p = 0.059) [ 29 ].
When parents were the informants, the difference was almost significant, p = 0.059.
Air quality has a significant negative relationship with QBR ( p = 0.035) and a marginally significant positive relationship with interception percentage ( p = 0.059).
For the three explanatory variables in the model (‘attitude’, ‘subjective norms’, and ‘perceived behavioural control’) and the three pairs of countries, which gives a total of nine parameters, the differences are statistically very significant in as many as four cases ( p < 0.01), and fairly significant in one additional case ( p = 0.059).
There was a marginally significant correlation between the blood Hg level and the WAZ-BWZ among 109 infants (r = −0.182, p = 0.059; Supplementary Figure S1 ).
Moreover, the education level had a marginally significant positive effect on WPH ( β = 0.052, p = 0.059), indicating that residents with a higher education level might also have had a higher WPH during the outbreak period. 4.2.
Body weight changes in the SE group showed a trend towards significance with respect to the S group ( p = 0.059).
All working conditions were found to be significantly associated with poor self-rated health in all models except Model 7, the fully adjusted model, in which low decision latitude and ergonomic stress were not significant and low social support only showed a trend towards significance ( p = 0.059).
Analysis of the results for the third question, in the ‘intentions’ category of this second dilemma, indicates marginal significance in the no-sports group ( p = 0.059).
According to the sequential reciprocity model, the total effects of group interaction on purpose in life ( β = 0.130, p < 0.05; see Table 4 ) and on life satisfaction ( β = 0.100, p < 0.05) were significant; its effect on personal growth was also marginally significant ( β = 0.085, p = 0.059).
The multifactorial model for average swimming speed showed a trend towards significance ( p = 0.059) for sex, and significant effects ( p < 0.05) for age group, stroke, distance and the interactions sex × age group, sex × distance, age group × stroke, age group × distance, stroke × distance, sex × age group × stroke and sex × stroke × distance ( Table 2 ).
The difference in life satisfaction in the past between the two groups was marginally significant ( t = 1.90; p = 0.059).