Excerpts

In addition, not living with parents during university semesters displayed borderline significance ( p = 0.052) for daily/occasional smoking.

Here, ln hpcdd was marginally significant (p = 0.0527), but it was still in the same direction.

Additionally, SKMM showed an almost significant negative relationship with HADS score (Beta = −0.2559, p = 0.05297), implying that an increase in SKMM was associated with a decrease in HADS score.

50), with a clear trend toward significance ( p = 0.053).

When adjusting for demographic variables, we found no changes in the patterns of results or significances with one exception: The interaction between self-control and difficulty just missed significance, b = 0.08, 95% CI [0.00, 0.16], β = 0.17, SE = 0.03, p = 0.053, cautioning against putting too much weight on its interpretation.

Although this difference was marginally significant in univariate testing ( p = 0.053), the performance of the app in stimulating test requests was significantly better than the brochures in logistic models that adjusted for income.

A t-test with no expectation of direction found this difference to have marginal significance ( p = 0.0530). 3.5.

Within-group tests showed that participants in the WA-MBP-LS group significantly improved on JSS at posttest (B = 1.84, 95% CI = 0.19–3.49, d = 0.42, z = 2.19, p = 0.029), and they showed a trend very close to significance and of similar ES at follow-up (B = 1.94, 95% CI = −0.03–3.90, d = 0.48, z = 1.94, p = 0.053).

There was also a statistically significant difference between non-Hispanic Whites and Mexican Americans from 2003 through 2006 (+0.7%; p < 0.001) and a moderately significant relationship from 2011 through 2014 (+0.5%; p = 0.053).

Females exhibited marginally significant longer stand time (sex main effect, F (1, 17) = 4.345, p = 0.053; Figure 1 ).

With the exception of the third and sixth measurement, where differences were only borderline significant (M3: p = 0.053, M6: p = 0.090), differences were all significant at p < 0.01.

This effect was marginally significant (mental-training: p = 0.053, t = −2.01), while the control group did not show any effect ( p = 0.84, t = 0.20).

Of these, lag5 was the most significant ( p = 0.003); lag3 and lag4 were marginally significant ( p = 0.053; p = 0.081).

With regard to depression, there was a marginally insignificant effect for type of control group ( Q (1) = 3.74, p = 0.053), whereas no significant effect was observed for intervention duration ( Q (1) = 0.03, p = 0.87), training frequency ( Q (1) = 2.8, p = 0.09), session length ( Q (1) = 0.7, p = 0.4), or study quality ( Q (1) = 0.44, p = 0.51).

With regard to depression, there was a marginally insignificant effect for type of control group ( Q (1) = 3.74, p = 0.053), whereas no significant effect was observed for intervention duration ( Q (1) = 0.03, p = 0.87), training frequency ( Q (1) = 2.8, p = 0.09), session length ( Q (1) = 0.7, p = 0.4), and study quality ( Q (1) = 0.44, p = 0.51).

Particularly, the concentration of As III was 0.46 (0.28–0.77) μg/L in contaminated groundwater and 0.16 (0.06–0.41) μg/L in tap water, indicating that the concentration of the former was more than twice that of the latter, with borderline significance ( p = 0.053).

The interaction of icon type × cognitive level had a marginally significant effect on the FD ( p = 0.053).

A significant interaction was found between the consumption of fermented food and psychiatric diagnosis in predicting depressive symptoms ( p = 0.0001), and a borderline significant interaction for anxiety symptoms ( p = 0.053).

Engagement was reported to be marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.053).

Despite there being no significant interactions between the medium and incremental stages for the variables (HR, %HRmax, %HRR, VO 2 , %VO 2 max, %VO 2 R, and RPE), the interaction-effect of the medium and incremental stages for HR approached significance ( p = 0.053).

The regression model for the pain thresholds in the dominant hand was marginally significant, F (10, 110) = 1.90, p = 0.053, η 2 p = 0.147.

However, a p -value close to significance ( p = 0.053) was found for the week, highlighting a tendency in difference across weeks for both teams.

We believe that this “nearly significant” ( p = 0.053) outcome results from a small sample size.

The association between child ACE positivity and reported intimate partner violence also approached significance ( p < 0.0533) ( Table 3 ).

With non-transformed data, the year × hour interaction only approached significance ( p = 0.054), and compared with the reference hour, there was some evidence of an increase in electricity usage from 2019 to 2020 at 15:00, 17:00 and 20:00 ( p = 0.058, 0.079 and 0.082, respectively).