Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,842 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp < 0.102.0× alphagold
As described previously, we confirmed the influence of seasonality on the results of the question items of “Frequently purchased goods.” The results indicate that consumer electronics, medicine, and cosmetics showed marginally significant increases or statistically significant increases ( p < 0.10 or 0.05, respectively).
marginally significantp < 0.12.0× alphagold
For the interaction effects of significant (p < 0.05) and marginally significant (0.05 < p < 0.1) interaction effects, a multiple means comparison of the 20 treatment combinations was performed using the Tukey multiple range test at the level of significance of 5 % to generate the grouping of letters. 3.
of borderline significancep > 0.12.0× alpha
Part-time workers may have been less likely to report depression and anxiety than full-time workers (aOR 0.51 (95%CI 0.22–1.11) and 0.36 (95%CI 0.13–0.84), respectively), but this was only of borderline significance (p > 0.1 for depression, p = 0.026 for anxiety) and may be an artefact of multiple comparisons.
near significancep < .102.0× alphagold
- We can speak of a near significance (p < .10) with a moderate effect (R 2 = 0.052) in the absolute preference of the least attractive woman, where the results point to a greater preference for the protrusive profile among those who use the nets little/not at all (50%) and towards the retrusive profile among those who use them medium/
very close to significancep < .102.0× alpha
Very close to significance (p < .10) with a moderate effect (R2 = 0.050) was the absolute preference variable of the less attractive woman, which can be explained by a greater tendency of Facebook users towards the retrusive profile (76% vs. 54.7%). - SnapChat®: Statistical significance (p < .05) with a moderate effect (R 2 = 0.042) was found in the relative preference for the female silhouette, which is due to the greater choice of users of this network for the protrusive profile (81.1%).
moderately significantp = 0.12802.6× alphaqualifiedgold
According to Table 7 , the linear effect of solution pH (A), initial ion concentration (B), and adsorbent dosage (C) was significant (p < 0.0001) and the contact time (D) linear effect was moderately significant (p = 0.1280) for DS-TiO 2 ; while for OP-TiO 2 the linear adsorbent dosage, and solution pH was significant (p < 0.0001) and the contact time and initial concentration linear effect was moderately significant.
a negative trendp-value = 0.163.2× alphagold
Additional analysis done separately for individual positive trait scores showed a significant negative correlation for agreeableness score (r = −0.36, p-value = 0.03) ( Fig S3a ) and a negative trend for openness (r = −0.24, p-value = 0.16), extraversion (r = −0.15, p-value = 0.37) and conscientiousness (r = −0.26, p-value = 0.12).
a significant trendp = 0.1623.2× alphagold
Overall, the number of PAH uncontrolled diabetic complications increased on average by 28 per year (17–40), those of short-term diabetic complications did not show a significant trend (p = 0.162), those of long-term diabetic complications increased by 89 per year (70–109) and the overall number of PAH increased by 112 per year (89–135). 3.2.1 General characteristics of potentially avoidable hospitalizations Total admissions for diabetes represented between 0.3 and 0.5 % of all hospital admissions in Switzerland, while admissions for PAH represented an even smaller percentage, ranging between 0.13 and 0.21 %.