Excerpts

HR for high AAPR in relation to new cardiovascular events was borderline significant (HR 0.29, 95 % CI 0.08–1.06, p = 0.061).

A marginally significant three-factor interaction effect was found, F (4, 160) = 2.299, p = 0.061, η 2 = 0.054.

This contrast was significant for Disgusting (the morphed agents were evaluated as more disgusting than the pure non-morphed human and robot agents; F (1, 217) = 4.5, B = -0.82, 95% CI [-1.58, -0.06], p = .034), Friendly (the human and robot agents were evaluated as more friendly F (1, 271) = 4.9, B = 0.81, 95% CI [0.91, 1.53], p = .027), and approaching significance for Approachable (the morphed agents were less approachable; F (1, 217) = 3.5, B = -0.8, 95% CI [-1.65, 0.04], p = .061); all other measures were non-significant ( F s < 3.5; p s = n.s.).

In Model 3, PROMIS-SRI significantly predicted the behavioral sub-scale ( b = 0.07, p < 0.001) and PROMIS-SD almost reached significance ( b = −0.02, p = 0.061) with the overall model predicting 39.51 % of the variance in the behavioral sub-score.

Moreover, Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that high RPMBs could significantly predict poor DFS in male patients after R0 resection for N1 disease (HR: 5.431, 95% CI: 1.045–28.219, p = 0.024), and the p -value was very close to significance in these patients after adjuvant RAI therapy (HR: 6.269, 95% CI: 0.693–56.714, p = 0.062).

Post-hoc contrasts based on gender for the (ii) group∗gender∗race interaction showed a statistically significant higher rating of female compared to male participants for black faces in the Sham group only (M = -0.037; SD = 1.352; F = 0.239; SD = 1.265 ; z = 2.152, p = .031), and a trend towards significance for white faces (M = 0.084; SD = 1.326; F = 0.325; SD = 1.26 ; z = 1.864 , p = .062) ( Figure 5 ).

The coefficient for control of corruption is positive (1.544), though it is marginally insignificant at the 0.05 level (p-value = 0.062).

The linear coefficient of 0.61155 (p < 0.001) signifies a strong linear effect, while the quadratic coefficient of −0.10510 suggests a marginal quadratic effect that is approaching significance (p = 0.0623).

It is worth noting that the difference in identification speed between expected words and new words was only marginally significant ( β = −0.08, SE = 0.04, t = −1.89, p = 0.0623).

The only factor that showed marginally significant difference between groups was internalizing behavior problems (p = .063).

The only significant difference that remained was the comparison of HP10 Ag CSF with HP10 serum (p = .031), and the comparison of PCR with HP10 Ag serum was borderline significant (p = .063).

Comparisons of specificity of other assays with ELISA-Ag were of borderline significance (p = .063).

Although blood glucose analysis revealed no significant main effect for condition and no significant interaction effect, a main effect for time showed a trend against significance ( F (5,95) = 2.17, P = 0.064, η p 2 = 0.10).

The number of correct markings to the six statements about symptoms of inadequate fluid intake showed a not significant time effect (F(2,288) = 1.480, p = 0.229, η 2 p = 0.01) and a marginally significant Time × Group interaction with a small effect (F(2,288) = 2.756, p = 0.065, η 2 p = 0.02).

A two-way within-subjects ANOVA on the signal changes in the superior IPS revealed a marginally significant interaction between the task (image-based, material-based, vs. color-based) and set size (2, 4, vs. 6), F (4, 68) = 2.33, p = .065, which indicated that the effect of set size was significant in the color-based change detection task, F (2, 16) = 5.17, p = .019, but not in the image-based and material-based tasks, F (2, 16) = 1.93, p = .178 and F (2, 16) = 0.15, p = .862, respectively.

Patients with hypertension only showed a trend towards higher MCC ratios, with no statistical significance (p = 0.066) ( Fig. 2 c).

However, the rs3134940 genotypes and alleles frequency showed a marginally significant difference between the COPD-BBS group and BBES (p = 0.066 and 0.075, respectively).

Nevertheless, median OS with T-DM1 was still not reached in the DESTINY-Breast03, with an OS curve pointing towards better long-term trend compared to the same T-DM1 curve in the EMILIA, but with a strong trend on IPD survival analysis (p = 0.067) ( Fig. 1 B).

4 A) of benthic macroinvertebrates, while the differences in δ 13 C values among species were marginally significant (p = 0.068, Kruskal–Wallis test, n = 60, Fig. 4 B).

The prime x timing interaction was only marginally significant ( p = .069, η 2 p = .122).

In rats that received IA Zilretta on day 7, jump incapacitance on day 15 (8 days after injection) was almost normal (96 ± 5.7%) and, in contrast to the DMM and vehicle group, was not statistically different (p = 0.45) to healthy controls (103 ± 6.7%) and almost significantly different the DMM and vehicle group (p = 0.069).

Ischemic heart disease and dementia also showed a trend toward predicted the ED delirium (OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 0.93–5.20; P = 0.07 and OR, 5.54; 95% CI, 0.91–33.53; P = 0.06, respectively). 4.

Nights away from home was significantly dependent on cluster membership ( p < .01), and it approached significance ( p = .07) with fiscal year ( Table 10 ).

Similarly, milk 3′SL showed a trend towards higher concentration in PDM-HF compared to PDM-LF ( p = 0.07).

The level of prosodic boundaries achieved marginal significance (χ 2 = 9.91, p = .07).