Results showed that the effect size of PATHS at follow-up was 0.10, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.07).
Excerpts
Gaze durations for the same region showed a marginally significant simple effect of Structure for which RCE patterned faster than SRCE in the Plausible conditions ( p = 0.07).
As for the explicit measure of math anxiety, a marginally significant positive correlation was found between maternal help and the sum of children’s responses on the AMAS self-report questionnaire ( r = 0.28, p = 0.07).
A semantic blocking effect was obtained, with slower naming latencies in the semantically related condition than in the unrelated condition [580 and 570 ms, respectively; marginally significant by subjects, t 1(11) = 1.98; p = 0.07; t 2(53) = 2.25; p < 0.05].
approached significancep = 0.07
Furthermore, the difference between positive and neutral words approached significance ( p = 0.07).
The initial model (AIC = 497.2) which includes the three predictors shows that LF-P is marginally significant (β = 0.49, Z = 1.77, p = 0.07), while NF-P (β = 0.12, Z = 0.80, p = 0.426), and SI (β = -0.08, Z = -0.44, p = 0.663) are not.
A marginally significant main effect of button function was found [ F (1,80) = 3.38, p = 0.070, η p 2 = 0.04], together with a significant interaction effect of age group and button function [ F (2,80) = 3.51, p = 0.035, η p 2 = 0.08].
showed a trendP = 0.07
When examining subdimensions of FT, the burden of depleted FT coping resources (coping FT) was strongly associated with the risk of repeat AC visits (RR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.15–1.40, P < 0.001) while material FT burden showed a trend toward association (RR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.99–1.15, P = 0.07).
Regarding theta 2 power, the main effects of time [ F (1,58) = 9.89, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.15], site [ F (3,174) = 33.45, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.37], and condition [ F (3,174) = 39.31, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.40] were observed; importantly, a marginally significant interaction effect of time point × site × condition × group [ F (9,522) = 1.75, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.03] was observed.
We found marginally significant evidence indicating the hypothesized moderating effect of age on peer influence on STEM-related activities (β = −1.44, SE = 0.97, one-sided p = 0.07).
The SCZ and the HC group only differed at a statistical trend ( Md SCZ = 6, Md HC = 7; W = 551.1, p = 0.07, d C = 0.27).
The second ANOVA, conducted in order to provide a more in-depth investigation into the interaction between the priming effect and emotional valences, did yield a marginally significant Prime Emotion × Target Emotion interaction [ F (2,56, 97.21) = 2.5, p < 0.07, η p^2 = 0.06].
approached significancep = 0.07
Critically, however, the difference between these two similarity correlations only approached significance, z = 1.84, p = 0.07.
The difference between refugee and recently immigrated parents was close to being significant ( t = 1.850, p = 0.070).
trending toward significancep = 0.07
Gesture Performance and Behavioral Measures Social impairment Gesture performance was negatively correlated with SRS scores in both groups, reaching statistical significance only in the TD group ( r = −0.60, p = 0.02) and trending toward significance in the ASD group ( r = −0.55, p = 0.07); see Figure 4 .
The interactions between experiments and measure types were significant when comparing Experiment 1 with Experiment 2 ( B = −0.60, SE = 0.33, p = 0.07, R 2 = 0.10; marginally significant), and comparing Experiment 2 with Experiment 3 ( B = 0.69, SE = 0.33, p = 0.04, R 2 = 0.10).
a trend toward significanceP = 0.07
On the other hand, a significant stimulus type x belt color interaction with large ES (η 2 p = 0.17) for N450 area, but only a trend toward significance ( P = 0.07) for lower N450 area incongruent compared to congruent trials in the WB group.
The interaction between condition and gender was marginally significant [ F (3, 11,521) = 2.357, p = 0.070, η 2 = 0.005].
There were some almost significant ( p = 0.07–0.08) trends in some of the variables studied: Social awareness improved in the Latvian student sample in both age groups as well as in Slovenian 8–11-year old student sample.
approached significancep = 0.07
The interaction between the factors was not significant for Opacity, χ 2 (2) = 0.07, p = 0.96, and it approached significance for Oiliness, β Standard = −0.69, SE Standard = 0.32, χ 2 (2) = 5.42, p = 0.07.
This analysis yielded a main effect of model-based values, b = 0.30, SE = 0.14, t (71.46) = 2.17, p = 0.03, and a marginally significant main effect of model-free values, b = 0.16, SE = 0.09, t (162.97) = 1.82, p = 0.07.
Although the relationship between wife’s hair length and husband-rated wife’s attractiveness showed marginal significance ( β = 0.11, SE = 0.06, 95% CI = [−0.014, 0.230], p = 0.070), the indirect effect remained significant. 1 On the other hand, the indirect pathway from husband’s hair length to sexual frequency via wife-rated husband’s attractiveness and wife’s sexual desire did not yield significance.
There was a marginally significant main effect of participant gender ( F (1,82) = 3.35, MSE = 140,584.08, p = 0.07), such that females (967 ms) were faster to respond than males (1,055 ms).
Results for the t-shirt revealed a marginally significant main effect of authorship ( β = 0.457, t = 1.95, p = 0.07), a significant two-way interaction between authorship and loneliness ( β = 0.045, t = 2.46, p < 0.05), and a significant three-way interaction between authorship, loneliness, and product background lighting ( β = −0.066, t = 2.07 , p < 0.05).
However, during the cognitive control task, the interaction between exercise intensity and time approached the level of significance ( p = 0.07) on mean accuracy, which made the interpretation of the impact of high intensity exercise on cognitive control complicated.