Excerpts

There was a marginally significant main effect of group relationship [ F (1,62) = 3.58, p = 0.063, η p 2 = 0.055].

Two-way ANOVAs revealed a main effect of reward value on felt achievement [ M high value = 5.03, M low value = 4.41; F (1, 259) = 9.40, p = 0.002, ω p 2 = 0.031] and a marginally significant main effect of reward value on competence [ M high value = 4.77, M low value = 4.43; F (1, 259) = 3.47, p = 0.063, ω p 2 = 0.009].

In a test of divided attention, for example, this improvement was not quite significant ( p = 0.063) after 5 months but, after another 5 months of extra training, the level of improvement further increased, reaching more reliable effects ( p = 0.002).

There was no main effect of trial type [ F (1,61) = 0.70, p = 0.41, η2 p = 0.011] but a close-to-significant interaction of trial type and age group, F (2,61) = 2.89, p = 0.063, η2 p = 0.087.

Subjective Feelings of Sadness The 3 (time: at baseline, after rumination induction, after mood induction) × 3 (group: anger group, joy group, neutral mood group) repeated measures ANOVA of sadness indicated that the main effect of time was significant [ F (2,174) = 62.614, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.419], the main effect of group was marginally significant [ F (2,87) = 2.847, p = 0.063, η 2 = 0.061], the interaction between time and group was significant [ F (4,174) = 2.630, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.057].

ERP Results In the 300–500 ms time window, statistical analysis of the ERP response to polysemous targets with three levels of Condition showed a marginally significant effect of Condition [ F (2,58) = 2.89, p = 0.063, η 2 = 0.091] in the midline electrode groups with no significant interaction with the Posteriority factor.

Among the covariates, only infant age predicted the slope, albeit with a significant trend [ b = 0.021, 95%CI = (–0.013, 0.044), p = 0.063].

For statistics anxiety, only a marginally significant association is found: statistics anxiety is negatively related to performance (β = −0.303, p = 0.063).

Regarding the performance until the first successful trial between the colored and non-colored sequence groups, two-sample t -tests showed a significant difference of total number of button presses [ t (36) = 2.15, p < 0.05, d = 0.70; colored sequence group, mean = 185 times; non-colored sequence group, mean = 248 times] and a marginally significant difference of mean button press time [ t (36) = 1.91, p = 0.063, d = 0.62; colored sequence group, mean = 734 ms; non-colored sequence group, mean = 668 ms], but did not show a significant difference of total working time [ t (36) = 1.46, p = 0.15, d = 0.47; colored sequence group, mean = 135 s; non-colored sequence group, mean = 163 s].

However, note that the trend is close to significance with Musical Quality, in the necessity condition, (CG = 3.08; EG2 = 4.33; p = 0.063).

The Emotion × Self-Relevance × Task × Region interaction was marginally significant in the mid-regions omnibus [ F (8,384) = 2.32, p = 0.063, η 2 = 0.046] and not significant in the peripheral regions omnibus [ F (2,96) = 0.72, p = 0.489, η 2 = 0.015].

The interaction between affective content and velocity was marginally significant, F (1.60, 52.93) = 3.11, p = 0.063, ε = 0.80, η p 2 = 0.09.

A negative trend was observed in the relation between estimated intelligence quotient (IQ) scores and age ( r = –0.33, P = 0.063), indicating that in this sample IQ scores decreased with age.

The control group, in contrast, showed a nonsignificant trend toward a decrease in this trait ( p = 0.063, rb = −0.26).

The analysis yielded a main effect of competitive intragroup outcome interdependence, F (1,137) = 29.27, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.176, and a significant Strategies × Competitive Intragroup Outcome Interdependence interaction, F (1,137) = 18.58, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.119, and a marginally significant Results Presentation × Strategies interaction, F (1,137) = 3.52, p = 0.063, η 2 = 0.025.

It showed that the three-way interaction was marginally significant ( F 1 , 50 = 3.62, p = 0.063, partial η 2 = 0.068).

The interaction among time, stress state and regulation strategy was marginally significant [ F (2,174) = 2.802, p = 0.063, η 2 = 0.031].

The main effect of Group approached significance [ F (2,57) = 2.898, p = 0.063, ε 2 = 0.092], reflecting higher overall accuracy in Controls than RH patients, and RH patients than LH patients (Control M = 91.7, SD = 0.08; RH M = 90.4, SD = 0.11, LH M = 84.1, SD = 0.13).

The ANOVA on the data from the iambic condition yielded a marginally significant effect of Congruence, F (1,18) = 3.936, p = 0.063, η p 2 = 0.179, indicating a tendency of congruent items to evoke more negative potentials.

Looking at descriptive results, establishing a green office was associated with lower pre-questionnaire self-efficacy ( M established = 5.07, M not_established = 5.24), higher collective efficacy ( M established = 5.47, M not_established = 5.31), lower participatory efficacy ( M established = 4.54, M not_established = 4.88), and more volunteer time ( M established = 5.85, M not_established = 4.13) that also emerged as marginally significant predictor ( p = 0.063).

A marginally significant interaction qualified the main effects [ F (1,38) = 3.675, MSE = 822, p = 0.063, η g 2 = 0.015; +A+M: 414 ms, +C+M: 431 ms, +A–M: 451 ms, +C–M: 450 ms].

For the lateral electrodes, a Condition (3) by Anteriority (2) and Hemisphere (2) repeated measures ANOVA showed a trend for a main effect of Condition [ F (2,56) = 2.903, p = 0.063], and a significant Condition by Hemisphere interaction [ F (2,56) = 6.496, p < 0.05].

As illustrated in Figure 3 , there was a marginally significant main effect of Group, suggesting a trend for experts to be faster than novices overall [ F (1, 28) = 3.754, p = 0.063, η p 2 = 0.118].

Two studies demonstrated improved response times on Go/No-Go ( Ando et al., 2013 ) or ANT tasks ( Huertas et al., 2011 [marginal significance: p < 0.063]).

No other main effects or interactions were found at the ventral-medial sites, where the interaction between Context and Combination only approached significance, F (1, 20) = 3.866, p = 0.063, nor at the ventral-lateral sites.