Barely Significant

Excerpts

6,422 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.0621.2× alphagold
A mixed effect logistic regression, predicting the likelihood of making this type of error (1, 0) by condition, controlling for time point and problem type revealed that this difference was marginally significant: Children in the action condition made more adding-the-first-two-numbers errors than children in the gesture condition [χ 2 (1) = 3.50, p = 0.062].
approached significancep = 0.0621.2× alpha
The two-way interaction of video x phase was not significant when all three video conditions were entered into the ANOVA model, p > 0.17, but it approached significance when the urban video and no video data were combined into a single group for comparison with the nature video condition, F (1, 88) = 3.570, p = 0.062, η p 2 = 0.039.
marginally significantp = 0.06231.2× alphagold
The Tukey least-squares-means test showed that participants accepted offers made when the computer displayed GL more than when it displayed RH ( p = 0.0623, marginally significant) or no light animation ( p < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between when the computer displayed RH and no light animation.
showed a trendp = 0.06251.3× alpha
Mean participant age was also negatively associated with effect sizes ( β = −0.05, SE = 0.02, t(12) = −2.56, p = 0.0248, 95% CI [−0.09, −0.01]), whereas sample size showed a trend towards smaller effects in larger studies (β = −0.03, SE = 0.01, t(12) = −2.05, p = 0.0625, 95% CI [−0.05, 0.00]).
marginally significantp = 0.0631.3× alphagold
those who had not (17 participants) correctly indicated the frequent distractor region, in a group × distractor condition analysis of variance (ANOVA), revealed [besides a significant distractor condition main effect: F (1.37,31.52) = 38.12, p < 0.001; Greenhouse-Geisser-corrected values] a marginally significant interaction, F (1.37,31.52) = 2.38, p = 0.063 (Greenhouse-Geisser-corrected values).
marginally significantp = 0.0631.3× alphagold
Looking at descriptive results, establishing a green office was associated with lower pre-questionnaire self-efficacy ( M established = 5.07, M not_established = 5.24), higher collective efficacy ( M established = 5.47, M not_established = 5.31), lower participatory efficacy ( M established = 4.54, M not_established = 4.88), and more volunteer time ( M established = 5.85, M not_established = 4.13) that also emerged as marginally significant predictor ( p = 0.063).
marginally significantp = 0.0631.3× alphagold
approached significancep = 0.0821.6× alpha
The interaction between region and number approached significance, F (1, 27) = 2.62, p = 0.082, η 2 p = 0.089 and further analyses yielded a marginally significant difference between plural and singular attractors in the centroparietal region, t (27) = 1.94, p = 0.063, and a significant difference in the parieto-occipital region, t (27) = 2.32, p = 0.028, with plural attractors showing an increased amplitude when compared to singular attractors.
marginally significantp = 0.0631.3× alphagold
Subjective Feelings of Sadness The 3 (time: at baseline, after rumination induction, after mood induction) × 3 (group: anger group, joy group, neutral mood group) repeated measures ANOVA of sadness indicated that the main effect of time was significant [ F (2,174) = 62.614, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.419], the main effect of group was marginally significant [ F (2,87) = 2.847, p = 0.063, η 2 = 0.061], the interaction between time and group was significant [ F (4,174) = 2.630, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.057].
marginally significantp = 0.0631.3× alphagold
Two-way ANOVAs revealed a main effect of reward value on felt achievement [ M high value = 5.03, M low value = 4.41; F (1, 259) = 9.40, p = 0.002, ω p 2 = 0.031] and a marginally significant main effect of reward value on competence [ M high value = 4.77, M low value = 4.43; F (1, 259) = 3.47, p = 0.063, ω p 2 = 0.009].
Deriving Mental Energy From Task Completion.
Front Psychol · 2021 · PMC8418126