Excerpts

The main effect of Veracity was borderline significant ( F = 4.939, p = 0.053); no other effects reached significance.

In the analysis of d-primes in the GNAT, we observed a main effect of name close to significance [ F (1, 8) = 5.150, p = 0.053, ηp 2 = 0.392], with higher sensitivity to German than to Arabic names.

The results are shown in Table 7 , the difference between G0 and G2 is marginally significant ( p = 0.053), and the difference between G0 and the other two layout methods, G1 and G3, is not significant ( p > 0.05); the difference between G1 and G2 Significant ( p = 0.037), the difference between G1 and G3 was not significant ( p = 0.101); the difference between G2 and G3 was not significant ( p = 0.653).

There was a marginally significant effect of ratio, F (2, 104) = 3.02, p = 0.053, The Developing Mental Number Line: Does Its Directionality Relate to 5- to 7-Year-Old Children’s Mathematical Abilities? = 0.055, and a linear contrast analysis revealed a statistically significant linear trend, F (1, 55) = 4.45, p = 0.040, η p 2 = 0.079, such that performance improved as ratio decreased (e.g., better performance for a ratio of 4:7 than 4:5), as expected.

The main effect of ethical information was qualified by a marginally significant interaction, F (2, 82) = 3.05, p = 0.053, partial η 2 = 0.07.

The main effect of salience was marginally significant, Estimates = −0.131, β = −0.150, t = −1.94, p = 0.053, Cohen’s d = −1.942.

This main effect was qualified by a marginally significant congruency × age interaction, F (2, 110) = 3.13, MSE = 0.004, p = 0.053, partial η 2 = 0.05, as in younger adults, accuracy was significantly higher for congruent ( M = 93.4%, SD = 5.7%) relative to incongruent trials ( M = 90.8%, SD = 7.1%), t (27) = 3.35, p = 0.002.

Only in the case of Hungary in the 40th–60th percentile split, we did not find a significant difference, and in the 60th–40th percentile split, the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.053).

Results of the mixed model ANOVA indicated the main effect of vision approached significance, F (1,16) = 4.38, p = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.22, with children in the moderate group ( M = 10.33, SD = 0.33) trending toward lower error scores than those in the profound group ( M = 11.42, SD = 0.41).

There was a marginally significant difference between the stimulus groups ( f (2,84) = 3.04, p = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.068).

The distribution of AU 17 was marginally significant across platforms/versions, H (5) = 10.932, p = 0.053.

Subjective Quality of Life Supporting H1c, analysis revealed a marginally significant effect of pre-retirement multiple identities at Step 1 (β = 0.16, p = 0.053) that explained 2% of the total variance.

For upright houses, the Similarity × Age interaction was significant, F (4,118) = 9.0, p = 0.0001, but the simple effect of similarity was only marginally significant for older children ( p = 0.053, no linear trend) and not significant for adults or younger children.

However, although approaching significance, there was no significant effect of PBF on percent VO 2 max at crossover point during the SGET ( P = 0.053).

Results In total, 1 year after the mindset induction, students originally assigned at random to the Develop condition reported on average greater intentions to use cultivation strategies when their passion was low ( M = 27.61, SD = 3.75), compared to those in the Fit condition—a marginally significant effect ( M = 25.57, SD = 4.74), b = 2.04, [0.02, 4.11], t (68) = 1.97, p = 0.053, Cohen’s d = 0.48.

Furthermore, there was a trend toward significance in the anger accuracy rate of the ChatGPT-3.5 compared to the TD group ( p = 0.053), but not compared to the ASD group ( p = 0.11).

Planned comparisons indicated that the difference in P e amplitude between errors and correct responses at Fcz was marginally significant in adults, F (1,46) = 3.94, p = 0.053, older children, F (1,46) = 3.06, p = 0.087, and younger children, F (1,46) = 3.25, p = 0.078 groups, but not in the medium children group, p > 0.1.

While the difference between 8- and 10-year-olds is not significant (β = 2.167, SE = 1.571, t = 1.416, p = 0.177), the difference between 10-year-olds and adults shows a strong trend of increase (β = 3.250, SE = 1.592, t = 2.041, p = 0.053).

However, it is important to point out that the amygdala showed a trend of significantly greater indirect connections to both the ACC ( p = 0.053) and the STP ( p = 0.051).

The difference over time between the three treatment arms for the alerting network approached significance [ F (4,133) = 2.40, p = 0.053].

The correlations between performance in both types of tasks and compensatory strategies were significantly negative for “repeat self-instructions” and “instructional comprehension” (see Table 4 ), meanwhile they were marginally significant between performance in “vigilance” and “instructor verbalizations” ( r = −0.29, p = 0.053).

Gf had significant influence on Color-Shape mixing cost (β = -0.179, p = 0.05) and the Stroop effect (β = -0.179, p < 0.04), but were also borderline significant for the Simon effect (β = -0.179, p = 0.053), Number-letter switch cost (β = -0.157, p = 0.06), and Color-Shape switch cost (-0.146, p = 0.09).

For Conscientiousness, the direct effect on attitudes toward climate change was found to be marginally significant, b = 0.088, SE = 0.045, z = 1.939, p = 0.053, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 0.00096 to 0.1770.

Repeated-measures ANOVA on the LPP component produced a significant main effect of electrode distribution [ F (2,41) = 8.593, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.1701], stimulus [ F (1,42) = 89.104, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.680] and a marginally significant main effect of competitive intensity [ F (2,42) = 3.155, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.131] (see Tables 2 , 3 ).

In The Bachelor shows, the main effect of cultural region exhibited only marginal significance, F (3, 97) = 2.66, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.08.