Excerpts

Unsolicited Play In regard to unsolicited activity by a peer, an increase in Group Play was marginally significant [ F (2,73) = 3.83, p = 0.05].

Turning to Training Mode and Monolingual/Bilingual, the Training Mode and Monolingual/Bilingual interaction, and the Training Mode × Monolingual/Bilingual × ao/av interaction were both very close to significance Training Mode × Monolingual/Bilingual, F (1, 65) = 3.91, p > 0.05, ηp 2 = 0.057; Training Mode × Monolingual/Bilingual × ao/av tests, F = 3.76, p>0.05, ηp 2 = 0.055 (critical F = 3.98).

However, despite no moderation effect, the temperamental characteristic of IBQ distress to limitations had a near-significant main effect in the 6 months (β = 0.28, p = 0.05), 9 months (β = 0.27, p = 0.06), and 12 months (β = 0.28, p = 0.05) models.

This difference between regions was marginally significant [χ 2 (2, 112) = 9.49, p < 0.05].

inverted) repeated-measures ANOVA revealed significant main effect of image ( F 1,3 = 194.90, p < 0.005), and a marginally significant effect of orientation ( F 1,3 = 10.00, p = 0.05).

In addition, the moderating effect of work meaningfulness was marginally significant ( β =0.08, p =0.05), indicating that the positive relationship between performance pressure and workplace anxiety was strengthened when the level of work meaningfulness was higher ( β =0.81, p <0.001) rather than lower ( β =0.67, p <0.001).

Gender also had a marginally significant interaction with the within subjects factor F (1, 99) = 3.64 ( p = 0.05) η 2 = 0.04, observed power was 0.47 and this interaction effect is presented in Figure 4 .

There was a marginally significant interaction between haptic strength and modality, b = -0.21, 95% CI = [-0.42, 0.00], χ 1 2 = 3.82, p = 0.05, suggesting that the relationship between haptic strength and iconicity was stronger in signed languages.

The intervention period of less than 6 weeks improved the response time to a certain extent, showing a marginally significant effect (SMD = −0.68, p = 0.05), while the intervention period exceeding 6 weeks did not make the response time reach statistical significance (SMD = −1.03, p > 0.07).

The anterior cingulate-dorsal prefrontal-angular gyri network (ICN10) in the TCC group also showed a trend of significantly decreased fALFF relative to the control group ( F = 4.108; p = 0.05).

The amnesic patients were at least 2 SD lower than the healthy comparison participants’ mean (1846: 2.10 SD, 2363: 3.10 SD, 2563: 3.30 SD), a difference that was marginally significant [ z (4)=1.96, p =.05].

The tests revealed a near-significant difference in three-day average PM 2.5 readings between Round 1 and Round 2 ( Z = −1.96; p = 0.05), and no differences in three cognitive measures: working memory ( Z = −1.13; p = 0.26), inhibitory control ( Z = −1.52; p = 0.10), and arithmetic ( Z = −0.87; p = 0.39).

Of the 420 inter-listener correlations, only 18 failed to reach significance at p = 0.05 level, and the majority were significant p < 0.001.

Aerobic exercise (1 study) showed marginal significance (SMD = −0.43, 95% CI [−0.85, 0.00], p = 0.05).

Results First, as regards cannabis effects, our data showed a trend towards more severe positive symptoms (PANSS, p = 0.05) and better performance in manipulative abilities (matrix test-WAIS, p = 0.041) among cannabis users compared to non-users.

The significant predictors were age ( B = 0.051, SE = 0.016, p = 0.001), emotion management ( B = 0.470, SE = 0.147, p = 0.002) and, approaching significance, conscientiousness ( B = 0.034, SE = 0.017, p = 0.050).

Hearing level Speech Discrimination Score values in the ear to be implanted showed a trend of correlation with the domain “Delayed memory” ( r = 0.345, p = 0.050).

The χ 2 ( Table 3 ) was not statistically significant in the final measurement model for adoptive mothers but was marginally significant in the final measurement model for adoptive fathers ( p < 0.05).

In addition, trust in people had a marginally significant effect on social empathy ( β = 0.100, p ≤ 0.05), and had a significant effect on subjective well-being ( β = 0.223, p < 0.001).

Both of them showed marginal significance ( p = 0.05), which may be related to the fluency state being a higher psychological state of competitive sports psychology, and it may also be related to the level of athletes’ trait mindfulness and the time effect of mindfulness training.

In the no-contact condition, the simple main effect of the state of the phone was marginally significant, F (1.49,35.87) = 3.71, p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.011, and the dots distance was significant, F (1.22,29.31) = 5.39, p = 0.02, η 2 = 0.024.

Additionally, the difference of implicit aggression between high empathy and low empathy conditions approached significance in the justified- role play condition ( p = 0.05).

The interaction was borderline significant, F (4,84) = 2.43, p = 0.05.

The difference in emotional involvement was at the threshold of significance after FDR correction [ t (26) = 2.08, p = 0.05, 95% CI (0.01, 2.08)].

A trend towards significance emerged ( t =2.2, p =0.05).