Excerpts

A final difference is in the correlation between depressive symptoms and anxiety feelings, which was large and significant in the EA group, but small and only marginally significant in the MA group, suggesting that the meaning of depressive symptoms and general anxiety feelings may differ between the groups. 3 Indirect effects For comparison between groups, Model 3 indirect effects are reported for the EA and MA subsamples.

Focusing on the quality of the options, there was neither a significant difference in the quality of the first choice between the groups, F (3, 69) = 0.74, p = 0.53, f = 0.18, 1−β = 0.21, nor in the quality of the final choice between the groups, F (3, 69) = 2.25, p = 0.09, f = 0.31, 1−β = 0.57, although in this latter case, the effect size was of moderate strength and the alpha value was approaching significance.

All intraclass correlations resulted in highly significant coefficients.

There was a numerical trend for RVF items to be recognized more than LVF items but this difference did not reach significance [ F (1,21) = 2.06], nor did VF interact with cloze bins [ F (2,42) = 0.13].

When data from that study were fit to the quadratic model, a highly significant linear component was found, as expected and reported in Wlotko and Federmeier ( 2012a ), but the quadratic term was not significant.

Such genetic biases would generally act as cultural attractors over relatively large time periods, so the increased time-window for language history suggests that there may be significant numbers of such effects yet to be discovered.

When education and vocabulary were controlled, the group differences remained virtually unchanged for the self-report measures, but became only marginally significant for the BWP.

When contextual sensitivity was compared between groups, the overall effect of group was no longer significant (see Figure 4 ): F (2, 50) = 0.513, p = 0.60, partial eta squared = 0.02), and none of the pairwise between-group comparisons approached significance (all p s > 0.12).

Only the left SPL, which showed a trend in the block averaging analysis, also showed higher activity for the high motion than low motion sentences during the last two TR's of the block [ t (11) = 2.44, P = 0.03; Figure 3 ].

However the tendency itself would also explain why there is an overall trend toward finding higher imagery across the body of literature as a whole (e.g., Barnett and Newell, 2008 ; Spiller and Jansari, 2008 ; Meier and Rothen, under review).

In the regression analysis where the possible confounding variables were controlled for, the visuospatial test was only marginally significant predictor of the Scale subtest.

A main effect of Belief condition revealed a non-significant trend, F (1, 23) = 2.958, p = 0.099, indicating that anti-free will participants tended to be slower to respond than controls (though this interpretation should be approached with caution due to the marginal significance level).

Results indicated a trend toward significant recruitment above baseline for actively learned letters in the left fusiform gyrus [ t (11) = 2.02, p = 068] (Figure 7A ) and right fusiform gyrus [ t (11) = 1.98, p = 0.073], (Figure 7B ) but no other contrasts approached significance.

The categorical associations of each of these methods of determining hemisity with each other and with asymmetry of the vgACC were highly significant (Morton and Rafto, 2010 ).

Discussion Participants with false intent showed a significantly lower blink count difference and lower number of blinks for the Explosive Intent questions as compared to the Drug Intent questions, with the difference in maximum blink duration approaching significance, as compared to participants with truthful intent.

Reducing the variance within the groups of patients and controls resulted in highly significant differences between patients and controls.

Exclusively gay men reported lower and drive for thinness and internalization; these differences were marginally significant.

A decreasing trend emerged thus confirming that the training did not only enable Francesca to read words, but also allowed her to “learn to learn.” In other words, the girl did not only learn to read some words, but she actually learned reading in general.

Multiple comparisons for the reward variant using Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference test showed that only the unidirectional instructions for seeking reward differed from the standard and no hint instructions; however, the significance levels of these variables were p = 0.08 and p = 0.09, respectively, indicating marginal significance.

The data also show a decreasing trend for average, poor and poorest fit semantic categories.

The results show an increasing trend (significant positive correlations) in the frequency of the best and the better fit semantic categories.

Furthermore, the difference between switch and non-switch trials was only marginally significant when the set size was large.

We first investigated whether infants’ overall fair choice score differed as a function of condition: there was a marginally significant difference in infants’ selection of the fair distributor in the CF/CUF condition (Caucasian Fair / Caucasian Unfair, M = 0.72, SE = 0.05) versus the AF/CUF condition (Asian Fair / Caucasian Unfair, M = 0.57, SE = 0.09), t (34) = 1.50, p = 0.07, d = 0.51.

Regarding abstraction, it only exhibits a marginally significant negative association.

This decrease in activity was primarily observed during haptic S1 processing in left LO with only a weak trend of deactivation for visual S1.