Excerpts

For the main effects in Model 1 (only independent variables included), teachers’ need-thwarting interpersonal behaviors significantly negatively predicted students’ PE class engagement ( β = −0.407, SE = 0.062, t = −7.429, p < 0.001***), while the predictive effect of need-supportive interpersonal behaviors on class engagement was marginally significant ( β = 0.095, SE = 0.047, t = 1.741, p = 0.083).

Three of the three HIP performers (100%) and two of the seven MS players (28.6%) exhibited lower pitch than absolute, a difference that approached near significance ( p = 0.083, Fisher’s exact test) and might attest to the higher degree of its usage among HIP players while playing 19th century music. 12 Examining the Sonata’s first movement, sparse usage and a rather shallow vibrato was found in the playing of MS representatives such as Capuçon, Dahn, Shoji, Little or Hanslip, as well as in the recordings of HIP violinists Faust, Seiler and Ibragimova.

For career control, the group × time interaction was not significant and the main effect of group was marginal significance [ F (2, 78) = 2.564, p = 0.083, Partial η 2 = 0.062].

A mixed-model analysis revealed a marginally significant effect of condition [Chi-square = 7.59, ( df = 2) p = 0.083].

However, one effect showed a trend toward significance (Group × tolerance: B = −0.192, SE = 0.110, p = 0.083).

The age variable demonstrated marginal significance in the linear model ( β = −0.091, p = 0.083), with a negative coefficient suggesting that effects may decrease with increasing age.

There was a marginally significant difference for V3, F (7, 1) = 4.082, p = 0.083.

The ANOVA for N170 amplitude revealed a marginally significant main effect of facial expression, F (2,68) = 2.60, p = 0.083, ε = 0.971, η p 2 = 0.07, indicating that N170 amplitude was slightly larger for disgusted faces than for neutral faces ( p = 0.064).

Pearson’s correlations were significantly negative in the rotation span ( r = −0.505, p = 0.004, R 2 = 0.255) as well as the reading span ( r = −0.409, p = 0.008, R 2 = 0.167), while the correlation only approached significance in the symmetry span ( r = −0.322, p = 0.084, R 2 = 0.104).

Although the main effect of Time was highly significant ( F = 100.403, p < 0.001), the main effect of Group was only marginally significant ( p = 0.084).

Although Worry showed a marginal trend at the 1-month mark ( p = 0.084) in re-admitted patients, this difference dissipated by the end of the 12-month follow-up.

The RT results showed a significant main effect of the consistency (β = 38.92, t = 3.69, p < 0.001), a marginally significant effect of imageability (β = 18.38, t = 1.74, p = 0.084), and non-significant interaction between consistency and imageability (β = 6.27, t = 0.30, p = 0.767).

Due to the restricted reliability of this single-item measure, though, both the repetition-contrast, M = +12.42, SD = 58.01 [-0.17; 25.01], t (83) = 1.96, d = 0.43, p = 0.053, and the baseline contrast M = +9.78, SD = 51.37 [-1.37; 20.93], fell short of significance, t (83) = 1.75, d = 0.38, p = 0.084.

An explicit warning to discount repetitions slightly increased the baseline-contrast score to a marginally significant level, M = +7.97, SD = 26.94 [-1.14; 17.08], t (35) = 1.78, d = 0.60, p = 0.084.

high = 0.24, p = 0.116), but the difference was only marginally significant ( z -value Δ = 1.38, p = 0.084).

For parent self-esteem, multivariate tests show a marginally significant effect of Time, F (1,49) = 3.10, p = 0.084, η p 2 = 0.06, a significant main interaction effect of Time × Group, F (2,56) = 5.19, p = 0.003, η p 2 = 0.17, and a non-significant main effect of Group ( p > 0.05).

In the model with red meat consumption as the dependent variable, the interaction between pre-test meat consumption and condition was significant, F (3, 125) = 3.08, p = 0.03, η 2 = 0.07, while the interaction between pre-test intention and condition approached significance, F (3, 125) = 2.27, p = 0.084, η 2 = 0.052.

There is a trend toward significance for the interaction between modality, adaptation phase and odor, F (3, 94) = 2.282, p = 0.084, η 2 = 0.068.

RESULTS CHANGE FROM BASELINE IN EEG-BASED VIGILANCE SCORE Among participants in the “rest” group, the difference in mean vigilance score between the baseline and the 15-minute rest scans was found to be mildly significant ( M = 1.12, SD = 0.02 in the 5-minute scan; M = 1.13, SD = 0.02 in the 15-minute scan; t (14) = -1.86, p = 0.084).

The incongruence/fit effect a 4 tended toward significance ( a 4 = 0.466, p = 0.084), indicating that increasing heterogeneity in relationship quality goes along with increased depersonalization.

A two-way between-subject multivariate analysis of variance indicated a significant Condition effect, F (10,154) = 2.418, p = 0.011; Wilks’ Λ = 0.747, and a borderline significant interaction effect between BMI percentile and Condition on the combined dependent variables, F (10,154) = 1.702, p = 0.085; Wilks’ Λ = 0.811.

Normalized SCL moderately negatively correlated with the extent to which participants reported that such a situation would be stressful to them in a real encounter, again trending toward significance ( r = −0.32, p = 0.085).

HR decreased significantly between Small Talk and Conflict by an estimated 2.45 beats per minute ( SE = 0.93 bpm, p = 0.045), although also the difference manifested for the most part between Small Talk and Teaching near significance (est. decrease of 2.45 bpm ; p = 0.085).

3.3 Enjoyment 3.3.1 Flow short scale Flow experience was initially high (5.18 ± 1.04 out of 7) in questionnaire trial 1 (Q1) and it increased marginally significant over time ( p = 0 . 085 , n g 2 = 0 . 04 ).

Moreover, the same children showed prosocial behaviors generated by affiliative/conventional motivations in smaller proportions, although this difference is only marginally statistically significant [ F (1) = 3.010, p = 0.085, η 2 = 0.019].