Excerpts

The interaction between valence and load showed a marginal trend, F (1, 24) = 3.32, p = 0.081, η2 p = 0.12.

A statistical trend was observed for VAMS anxiety [ F (1,22) = 2.62; p = 0.081 ; Table 3 ).

Results revealed a marginally significant main effect of valence in mPFC F (2, 24) = 2.80, p = 0.081.

There was a marginally significant effect of age on RT difference scores (LRT: χ 2 = 3.05, df = 1, P = 0.081; Table 4 ), revealing a trend for response-slowing being greater amongst younger animals.

A marginally significant distractor interference ( p = 0.081) was also found in the high-load condition (HLND).

Contrast analyses showed a decrease in negative deactivating affect between Time 0 and Time 1 in the self-compassion condition that approached significance ( M diff = −0.25, p = 0.082), and an increase in the control condition that approached significance ( M diff = 0.24, p = 0.069).

The expectancy effect was marginally significant [ F (1,21) = 3.34, MSe = 31.22, p = 0.082, η p 2 = 0.14; observed power = 0.42] and manifested itself as a negativity to low-expected words.

The follow-up regression models for each language showed that naming in the Uyghur language was significantly faster [ β = −20.61, SE β = 3.39, χ 2 (1) = 36.95, p < 0.001] when Language Dominance was more towards L1, while there was a marginally significant tendency [ β = 5.86, SE β = 3.37, χ 2 (1) = 3.02, p = 0.082] towards a slower response speed in the Chinese language as bilinguals were more L1-dominant.

For regret (step 1: R 2 = 0.15, p = 0.076, step 2: Δ R 2 = 0.08, p = 0.082) there was a marginally significant two-way interaction between behavior and anticipated emotion in the reverse direction, β = −0.51, SE = 0.28, p = 0.082.

The correlation was marginally significant between Raven’s IQ and PA ( r = 0.232, p = 0.082) and not significant between Raven’s IQ and RAN ( r = 0.220, p = 0.101).

In this reduced sample for active sourcing, we found no effect for age but a negative effect for gender ( OR = 0.464, SE = 0.065, p < 0.001), a positive effect for people with dual citizenship ( OR = 2.960, SE = 1.025, p = 0.002), and a negative trend for people born in Southern/Eastern Europe ( OR = 0.603, SE = 0.176, p = 0.082).

The results were nearly significant [ F (2, 389) = 2.520, p = 0.082].

The difference between TD and FXS-O approached significance ( p = 0.082, d = 0.56).

However, note that there was a marginally significant interaction of round by age ( F 3,32 = 2.44, p = 0.082, η 2 = 0.078) suggesting a stronger trend for younger children.

Only for the conversational material (CONV) a marginally significant correlation ( r = -0.23, p = 0.082, Pearson’s r ) was found.

Similar to the by-subjects analysis, the interaction between Congruency and Letter String Type showed a trend toward interaction, F (3, 24) = 2.522, MSE = 106.723, p = 0.082, showing largely the same pattern by-items as by-subjects.

More importantly, the three-way interaction between Avatar Position, PT Group and Motion Adaptor was also marginally significant, F (1, 10) = 3.726, p = 0.082, η 2 = 0.271.

The paternal helicopter attitude showed a positive but marginally significant effect (B = 0.005, p = 0.082), while self-determination had a significant negative effect (B = −0.048, p < 0.001).

Three of the three HIP performers (100%) and two of the seven MS players (28.6%) exhibited lower pitch than absolute, a difference that approached near significance ( p = 0.083, Fisher’s exact test) and might attest to the higher degree of its usage among HIP players while playing 19th century music. 12 Examining the Sonata’s first movement, sparse usage and a rather shallow vibrato was found in the playing of MS representatives such as Capuçon, Dahn, Shoji, Little or Hanslip, as well as in the recordings of HIP violinists Faust, Seiler and Ibragimova.

The ANOVA for N170 amplitude revealed a marginally significant main effect of facial expression, F (2,68) = 2.60, p = 0.083, ε = 0.971, η p 2 = 0.07, indicating that N170 amplitude was slightly larger for disgusted faces than for neutral faces ( p = 0.064).

Sixthly, in collective management, the inter-group effect at the pretest is marginally significant ( F = 3.126, p = 0.083, η 2 = 0.053), while the inter-group effect at the posttest is significant ( F = 12.108, p = 0.001, η 2 = 0.178), with the experimental group (23.97 ± 1.35) showing significantly higher collective management than the control group (22.61 ± 1.56).

This resulted in significant effects of salience for the durations of 60 ms [ F (2, 14) = 12.968, p = 0.001] and 120 ms [ F (2, 14) = 14.958, p < 0.001], and a marginally significant effect of salience for the duration of 480 ms [ F (2, 14) = 2.985, p = 0.083].

TBLs and MLs were not significantly different, although there was a slight tendency toward significance ( p = 0.083).

Here we found a significant two-way interaction between group and orientation [ F (1,68) = 5.307, p = 0.024] whereas the two-way interaction just failed to reach statistical significance [ F (1,68) = 3.087, p = 0.083].

All other interactions did not reach statistical significance ( p > 0.05), although the interaction between gender and TRFQ IC approached significance ( p = 0.083), indicating a potentially meaningful trend.