Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,862 sentences · 1 filter applied

a trend toward significancep = 0.0691.4× alpha
However, there was a trend toward significance for KIR2DL2 inhibitory receptor in relapse patients (13 relapse patients out of 16 are positive for KIR2DL2) when compared to non-relapse group ( p = 0.069) with a hazard ratio of 3.2 (95% CI: 0.91–11.26) (Table S3 in Supplementary Material).
marginally significantp=0.071.4× alphagold
Defined by methodology A, B, or C, higher PD-L1 group showed a better prognosis trend although the difference was marginally significant as determined by the log-rank test (p=0.07 as classified by methodology A, p=0.14 as classified by methodology B, p=0.12 as classified by methodology C, Figures 1A–C ).
an interesting trendp=0.071.4× alphagold
About other miRNAs, miR-30a showed an interesting trend resulting higher in NR vs R (p=0.07); instead, there were no statistically significant differences in miR-21, miR-22, miR-34a, miR-125b, miR-150 and miR-155 expression between two patient groups ( Supplementary Figure S6 ).
approached significancep = 0.071.4× alpha
A significantly larger proportion of total CD4 + and CD4 + T EMRA cells in SAT from diabetics were CD57 + CD69 lo CX 3 CR1 + GPR56 + compared to SAT from non-diabetics ( p = 0.051), and approached significance for CD4 + T EM cells ( p = 0.07) ( Figure 5C ).
showed a trendP =0.071.4× alpha
Patients whose TTVL 3-months post-transplant exceeded the currently proposed cutoff to predict infections within the first year post-transplant [6.2 log 10 ] showed a trend towards a higher risk of being hospitalized with an infection in the following 9 months, albeit without being statistically significant (HR=1.642, P =0.07).
marginal significancep = 0.071.4× alphagold
The results for the training cohort showed marginal significance for CCR7 (p = 0.07) and significance for SPP1 (p = 0.0033), while in the testing cohort, significance was observed for CCR7 (p = 0.035) and marginal significance for SPP1 (p = 0.073) ( Figure 6F ).