Excerpts

As seen in Table 3 , there were no significant differences in FNS score across the National Group, for most factors except for educational level, where the difference is borderline significant ( p = 0.078). 4.

Similarly to yield, statistically significant differences in protein purity were only detected between protein extracts from non-defatted and combination-defatted ( p = 0.0019), SFE-defatted ( p = 0.018) protein extracts, and a marginally significant difference between non-defatted and oil press-defatted seed flour ( p = 0.079).

The only parameter that had an almost significant effect was pH ( p = 0.079), ( Equation (S10) in the Supplementary Materials ), as Gal readily degraded at very harsh conditions.

There was a nonsignificant trend ( p = 0.08, for all) of a treatment effect on total number of eggs per pen, total eggs per hen, and percentage egg production, with the highest vitamin K 3 treatment group (45.7 mg/kg diet) having modestly lower values (for example, 95% of that of the control group for each of the three parameters). 3.2.

Among PUFA, linoleic acid (C18:2 c9 c12) showed a trend towards a higher proportion in meat from Tara lambs as compared to Control lambs ( p = 0.08).

As dietary energy levels increased, there was a decreasing trend in the concentration of C17:1 ( p = 0.08) and, conversely, an increasing trend in the concentration of C20:4n-6 ( p = 0.09).

Despite these differences in sensory acceptance, purchase intention scores for the control and EOB samples showed only a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.081), with respective responses as follows: texture (24 vs. 39), flavor (37 vs. 35), acidity (22 vs. 17), and overall impression (17 vs. 9).

non-anthropomorphic conditions) on anticipatory guilt which revealed a significant difference between the pain trait condition and the non-anthropomorphic conditions ( t (270) = 3.788, p = 0.002), while the difference between the intelligence trait and the non-anthropomorphic conditions was only marginally significant ( t (270) = 1.748, p = 0.082) and the difference between the pro-social trait condition and the non-anthropomorphic conditions was non-significant ( t (270) = 1.572, p = 0.117).

Although not all predictors were significant, there was a notable trend, with the solvent water/methanol showing a positive influence on FRAP levels (coefficient = 43.3467, p = 0.084), though this did not reach statistical significance. 4.

Results showed a trend toward an interaction between injection treatment and cooking time ( p = 0.084) on metallic flavour development in cooked meat.

Effect of Mentally Simulating the Vice Food (Chocolate Cookies) Regarding the results for desire, “time” as the main effect was marginally significant (F(140) = 3.10, p = 0.086).

Main Effects Analyses The two-way MANCOVA shows a marginally significant total direct effect of ad type on taste perceptions ( F (1, 136) = 2.96, p = 0.088), with the single-sense ad slogan ( M = 7.15, SD = 1.60) leading to more positive taste perceptions than the multiple-sense ad slogan ( M = 6.68, SD = 1.61).

Interaction analysis revealed that BD (temperature × pectinase dosage) was significant ( F = 6.68, p = 0.0216), while BC (temperature × cellulase) approached significance ( F = 3.35, p = 0.0884), which was consistent with the response surface plots ( Figure 2 ).

The ESB group showed a trend ( p = 0.089) toward reduced CRP compared to the ESPB and CB groups at the endpoint.

The main effect of PROC had a significant impact on ES Water separation ( p < 0.001) and ES Fat separation ( p < 0.001), and it was approaching significance on batter pH ( p = 0.090).

Further analysis by grape variety revealed that Sauvignon B wines were the most accurately identified by taste as non-Chardonnay wines, with three out of five wines showing significant recognition ( p < 0.05) and one nearing significance ( p = 0.09).

Baseline comparisons of key demographic and clinical characteristics showed no significant differences in age or waist–hip ratio between the groups; however, the BMI differences approached significance ( p = 0.09).

Differences in GI values resulted in marginally significant differences between RU-DIMESA and COMM (difference 21.4; 95% C.I. −2~4.7; p -value = 0.092) and between RU-PONTE and ICS (difference 22.1; 95% C.I. −0.8~45.0; p -value = 0.092).

Although the supplementation with rutin did not affect the concentration of individual n -6 PUFAs (including C18:2 ( n − 6), C18:3 ( n − 6), C20:2 ( n − 6), C20:3 ( n − 6), and C20:4 ( n − 6)), the R200 group showed an increasing trend in the sum of n -6 PUFAs in comparison to the other two groups ( p = 0.092).

The test indicated a marginally significant trend favoring the nose (t = −1.75; p = 0.093), implying that olfaction provides better overall recognition of the wines.

The remaining direct effects of motion on appeal ( B = 0.09, SE = 0.09, t (153) = 1.03, p = 0.306, d = 0.163) and taste perception ( B = 0.03, SE = 0.11, t (153) = 0.25, p = 0.802, d = 0.04) were not significant, but there was a marginally significant remaining direct effect of motion on healthiness perception ( B = −0.13, SE = 0.08, t (153) = −1.68, p = 0.096, d = −0.266).

The INFO-SENS and INFO groups did not differ significantly under Dunn’s test (Δ = −0.803, p = 0.164), whereas the corresponding Welch-corrected comparison reached only marginal significance ( p = 0.097).

Next, a marginally significant interaction effect of picture type and context on product attitudes was revealed, F(1, 268) = 2.75, p = 0.098, η2 = 0.010.

In addition, it can be seen that the linear effect of temperature had a marginally significant negative value ( p < 0.1).

Rapidly digested starch (RDS) had a marginal significance ( p < 0.1) to decrease linearly from the HS to LS diet.