Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,726 sentences · 1 filter applied

NACT showed borderline significance in its association with pain severity on POD 7 (χ2 = 6.320, p = 0.0970), suggesting that it might influence pain levels, although this association did not reach statistical significance at the 0.05 level.
marginally significantp = 0.09751.9× alphagold
The improvements in components that were not statistically significant were as follows: role limitations due to emotional problems improved by 20 units (64.3%, marginally significant, p = 0.0975), social functioning improved by 3.1 units (6%), and perceived health change improved by 3.3 units (10.4%).
an increasing trendp = 0.102.0× alphagold
On the other hand, in the non-obese group, there was an increase over time from 2,398 ± 1,798 steps preoperatively to 3,894 ± 2,345 steps at PO6M, and 4,039 ± 2,156 steps at PO1Y, although there was no clear significant difference at PO6M and PO1Y compared with preoperatively, there was an increasing trend (p = 0.10 and p = 0.08, respectively) (Table 2 and Figure 3B ).
approaching significancep<0.12.0× alphagold
For all detected pairwise differences at p<0.05 and pairwise comparisons approaching significance at p<0.1, effect size (ES) is presented as Cohen's D statistic [Cohen's d = (Mean2 - Mean1) / SDpooled] whereby values are interpreted as follows: ES < 0.1, negligible; ES 0.1-0.3, small; ES 0.3-0.5, moderate; ES 0.5-0.7, larger; and ES > 0.7, very large.