Barely Significant
← all phrases

“reached borderline significance”

371 sentences · 371 papers · 408 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0509

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

reached borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alphagold
Although this difference reached borderline significance in the univariate analysis ( p = 0.05), its relevance to the overall toxicological profile was robustly substantiated by subsequent multivariate analyses (see Section 2.5 ), where it was identified as a key driver of the toxicity model.
reached borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alphagold
While materially urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations appeared somewhat higher in the MetS group compared to the group without MetS, we found that only concentrations of MCPP reached borderline significance higher in the MetS men and women compared to those without MetS ( p = 0.05) (Table 2 ).
reached borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alphagold
approached significancep = 0.071.4× alpha
While not significant in crude analyses (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.68–1.07, p = 0.17), the association approached significance in Model 1 (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.60–1.02, p = 0.07) and reached borderline significance in the fully adjusted model (HR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.58–1.00, p = 0.05).
reached borderline significanceP = .051.0× alphagold
did not reach statistical significanceP = .091.8× alphaplainly factual
While the one-year mortality reduction for SupraMR vs MR reached borderline significance (RR 0.61, 95 % CI 0.38–0.99, P = .05), the HR comparison did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.36–1.12, P = .09).
reached borderline significanceP = .0501.0× alphagold
As shown in Table 7 , KOOS-Child Quality of Life and Kujala scores were significantly higher in the no-redislocation group, whereas KOOS-Child Pain reached borderline significance ( P = .050), indicating a negative impact of redislocation on long-term outcomes.
reached borderline significanceP = 0.0501.0× alphagold
In multivariable analyses, the time period when the operation was performed reached borderline significance as an independent prognostic factor for DMFS in LPS ( P = 0.050) and was statistically significant when comparing TP1 versus TP3 (HR 3.21, P = 0.025) and TP2 versus TP3 (HR 2.87, P = 0.029) separately ( Table S3 ).
reached borderline significancep < 0.051.0× alphagold
The PMN-MDSC levels correlated negatively at C Malaria with the subsequent lymphocyte circulating values at C Treat2 and reached borderline significance at C Treat3 (Spearman's rank correlation p < 0.05 and p = 0.056, respectively, Figures 5B,C ), but did not correlate with the lymphocyte levels at C Malaria ( p = 0.09, data not shown).