Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.08051.6× alphaplainly factual
Furthermore, a correlation analysis indicated a positive trend between fecal acetate and butyrate levels (r = 0.3562), although this did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.0805, Figure 8D ). 4 Discussion OIPN remains a critical dose-limiting side effect in diverse chemotherapy regimens, with currently limited therapeutic options ( 6 ).
In TCGA-HNSC, CIBERSORTx-based deconvolution suggested that higher C6-like signature scores were significantly associated with worse survival, whereas higher C9-like scores showed a trend toward better survival but did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 2 h).
In contrast, participants who had lost a parent (i.e., child bereaved individuals) showed a trend toward increased odds of being in LC3 compared to LC1 (OR=3.77, 95% CI=0.66–21.61), although this effect did not reach statistical significance (p=0.136).
Although the PSM analysis did not reach statistical significance for OS, a clear trend favoring the 2 g/m2 Ara-c dose was observed, suggesting a potential survival benefit with the higher dose in the CLAG regimen for R/R AML.
However, when accounting for the total plasma volume obtained by each method (cardiac puncture: ~0.5 mL; perfusate: ~3 mL), total particle yield per animal showed a trend toward higher recovery with perfusate blood collection in both naïve and 50 kdyne SCI groups, though these differences did not reach statistical significance ( Figure 2 c,d). 3.2.
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.09882.0× alphaplainly factual
Specifically, Dunn’s multiple comparisons test indicated that while the height loss score in the Severe group (2.700 ± 0) was numerically higher than that of the Mild group (1.667 ± 0.471), this pairwise comparison showed a strong trend but did not reach statistical significance (adjusted p = 0.0988), likely due to the conservative nature of the non-parametric test and the limited sample size in the Mild cohort.
did not reach statistical significancep ≈ 0.0641.3× alphaplainly factual
Neoadjuvant radiotherapy was also significantly associated with increased leakage risk (OR ≈ 3.29, 95% CI: 1.10–9.82, p ≈ 0.033), while neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed a positive trend toward higher leakage risk but did not reach statistical significance (OR ≈ 2.87, 95% CI: 0.94–8.78, p ≈ 0.064).