Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results (a) Comparison of the modes and magnitude of skull shape diversification in Darwin's finches and Hawaiian honeycreepers Morphometric analyses in which the more-inclusive landmark datasets were employed (using the final set of 15 landmarks which allows the extinct Hawaiian honeycreeper species to be analysed) on Darwin's finches, Hawaiian honeycreepers and their respective outgroups, reveal a highly significant degree of allometry ( p < 0.0001), which explains 12.6% of the variation in shape of the skull (electronic supplementary material, table S5).
highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Firstly, the gesture-only conditions (blurred, pointing, give-me gestures) were statistically investigated in a 2-way ANOVA (Time window × Gesture type) calculated across the three time windows, which revealed a highly significant interaction (F(4, 96) = 8.47, ε = 0.66, p = 0.0001, η p 2 = 0.26).
marginally significantp < 0.00010.0× alphagold
Again, we did not observe an increase in the proportion of adult mosquitoes, rather a marginally significant decrease with VIT8× (Fig. 1A , proportion of adults: p < 0.0001; AUX vs GF, VIT4×, or VIT8×: p < 0.0001; GF vs VIT4×: p = 0.73; GF vs VIT8×: p = 0.058; Supplementary Data 2 ).
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Pro; OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.90-1.75), a recent observational cohort study showed a highly significant association between the R72 variant (G allele) and PCa risk (OR: 7.937; 95% CI: 5.37-11.0, p<0.0001) in a Caucasian population, but no statistically significant enrichment of the R72 variant in patients with higher Gleason score disease (≥8) [ 29 , 30 ].
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Although there was a highly significant increase following the 6h of SD in all three groups (2xANOVA: WT: Interaction F 8,137 = 23.2, p < 0.0001; Time: F 8,137 = 12.1, p < 0.0001; SD: F 1,137 = 27.6, p < 0.0001; Tau : Interaction F 8,91 = 5.5, p < 0.0001; Time: F 8,91 = 3.2, p < 0.005; SD: F 1,91 = 46.7, p < 0.0001; Chimera: Interaction F 8,85 = 9.6 p < 0.0001; Time: F 8,85 = 5.2, p < 0.0001; SD: F 1,85 = 6.5, p < 0.05), direct comparison revealed the slower recovery, as reported by delta power during NREMS, in un-entrained Tau mice ( Figure 5M ).