Excerpts

As shown in Table 2 , the differences between natural outdoor environments and indoor environments are highly significant, statistically ( P < 0.0001 in all cases), and consistent across the Berkeley and Texas datasets, despite the very different imaging systems used (mobile phone camera vs.

Highly significant ( P < 0.0001) decrease in fasting PG and 2 h PP-PG, HbA1c, ASL, ALT, fasting total cholesterol, LDL, TG, and increase in HDL were observed after bariatric surgery.

The statistical analysis showed a highly significant correlation between this method and the clinical diagnosis, with a p ‐value < 0.0001.

Although there was an increasing trend from Process A (3.6 ± 0.5%) to Process B (7.9 ± 1.1%, p < .0001, compared to Process A) to Process C (9.5 ± 3.0%, p = .11 compared to Process A, p = .53 compared to Process B), the trend was not consistently statistically significant.

Specific leaf area Specific leaf area was 8.9% lower for red oak than bur oak on average, and this difference was highly significant ( F 1, 2191 = 83.85, P ≤ 0.0001, Fig. 2 d).

This compares well with the finding of Bala et al ., in which seroprevalence of syphilis was reported to be 1.2%[ 11 ] while the overall seroprevalence of syphilis in a study from Maharashtra was found to be 0.7% (90/13,008).[ 12 ] In our study, we found that seroprevalence of syphilis by VDRL test among male patients was 5.02 (365/7278) while that in females was 0.74 (368/50,030), and the difference between the two was highly significant.( P < 0.0001) It is comparable to the report by Geusau et al .[ 13 ] Moreover, in a study conducted by Tankhiwale and Naikwade, the seroprevalence of syphilis in males and females was 1.73% (44 of 2537) and 0.4% (46 of 10414), respectively.[ 12 ] The higher seroprevalence of syphilis in males could be because of the fact that only the suspected patients or high-risk patients or patients attending STI clinic are usually tested for syphilis serology.

Most of the questions of patient satisfaction were statistically highly significant ( p <0.0001).

Mixed-effect analysis showed highly significant effect of epoch for mouse F53 [ F (5.339,353.3) = 4.973, p = 0.0001] and mouse F46 [ F (5.346,336.8) = 3.024, p = 0.0093] ( Figure 7B ).

SED distributions across the three MIS conditions at all time points and for all tibiae), statistical testing confirmed highly significant differences (p < 0.0001).

4 , it comes out that the existence of a highly significant difference (p <0.0001; α = 0.05) between the proportions of the different professions; meaning that occupations strongly influence the profiles of infant flours users.

Both predictors are highly significant ( p < 0.0001 ).

Highly significant mitonuclear interaction terms were observed in each condition (ANOVA on the random effect model y ij = μ ~ mt i + n j + (mt × n) ij + ε ij , P < 0.0001, Table S 4 ) and could explain 10.8 to 31.5% of the total phenotypic variances (Fig. 1 c, Table S 5 ).

The difference between the treatments was marginally significant at Day 4 and 7 (P = 0.0532 and 0.0560, respectively), and highly significant by Day 14 (P < 0.0001; Fig 5D ).

Overall differences across histopathologic categories were highly significant (Kruskal–Wallis p < 0.0001), and there was a strong monotonic increase in OCNI across the ordered categories from benign to malignant disease (Jonckheere–Terpstra p < 0.0001).

Quantification of the vascular density is presented ( Fig 2B ), where analysis (ANOVA) indicated a highly significant difference between the groups ( p < .0001).

The average fasting blood glucose of pregnant ladies who lives in Abha (high altitude) was 72.5 ± 7.5 mg/dl and this was lower than the average fasting blood glucose of participants from Muhayil Aseer (low altitude) which was found to be 77.9 ± 5.7 mg/dl, this difference was reported to be highly significant ( P value = 0.0001) [ Table 2 ].

Adhesion Protocol Comparisons In comparisons of different adhesion protocol groups for each RBC, there were highly significant differences between and among groups for all RBCs: FOBF ( F =266.87, P <0.0001), TNCBF ( F =173.16, P <0.0001), and Z350XT ( F =103.64, P <0.0001).

The results of the ANOVA test on vasculitis parameters were highly significant ( p < 0.0001, refers to Supplementary Table S1 ).

However, a highly significant and strong correlation ( p < 0.0001) was found between the number of nuclei per OC and the percent eroded surface per bone surface in vitro ( Figure 4 b).

The model F-value of 178.56 indicated that the model was highly significant at p < 0.0001.

Furthermore, we evaluated the development of depression-like behavior as evidenced by immobility time in the tail suspension test and observed increased immobility time upon LPS treatment (Welch’s ANOVA demonstrated a highly significant effect of LPS (F(3,23.1)=17.19, p < 0.0001).

The a priori defined primary pharmacodynamic outcome of an increase in the frequency of Tregs as a percentage of CD4 + T-lymphocytes at D8 was dose-dependent (JT-J test, p < 0.0001) and highly significant for both treated arms (MW-U test, p < 0·0001; 2 MIU: mean [SD]: +6·2% [2·2]; 1 MIU: mean [SD]: +3·9% [1·2]) as compared to placebo (mean [SD]: −0·5% [1·3]) (see Table 3 , Fig. 2 a and b).

When quantifying the number of samples that are not heterozygous for a known eQTL but still show allelic imbalance, gene-level haplotypic expression levels were excluded for a sample if the individual was heterozygous for a top significant eQTL or a nominally significant (permutation p < 1e−4) independent eQTL in any of the 49 tissues.

There was a highly significant correlation of serum and saliva scores ( P < 0.0001) and the Spearman correlation coefficient of ρ = 0.602 indicated a moderate positive correlation [ 34 ].

This model explains more than 50% of the data variance (R 2 marginal = 48.3%; R 2 conditional = 53.3%) and shows a highly significant effect of the colour of the lights ( p -value < 0.0001, Estimate = 0.41) with red lights prompting the answer “warmer” and blue lights prompting the answer “colder” (Fig. 4 ).