Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results remained highly significant when excluding the cross-fostered bats ( n = 11), which were only tested in year 3 ( P < 0.00001; learning : 0.19±17 vs. 0.45 ±0.19 error rates, respectively, R 2 =0.72, p < 0.00001, mixed GLM with learning set as the response variable, the origin as a fixed factor and the bat’s ID as a random effect, n = 65).
highly significantp-value <0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results The results revealed highly significant changes (p-value <0.00001) in the levels of CEA (56.698±44.558 ng/mL), ENO1 (51.784±10.395 ng/mL), AFP (116.275±38.956 ng/mL), and CP (287.425±33.181 ng/mL) in the cancerous group compared to the control group, suggesting their potential utility in early diagnosis.
highly significantP < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Pooled data from 13 distinct datasets (10 unique studies), including 415 FGR cases and 561 controls, demonstrated a marked and highly significant prolongation of left ventricular isovolumetric relaxation time (LVIRT) in FGR fetuses compared with controls (SMD, 2.48 (95% CI, 1.55–3.41); P < 0.00001; I 2 = 97%) (Figure 3d ).
highly significantP < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The calculation of associations based on various models, based on [ Table 2 ], showed the most significant associations of iPNP, which imply a specific relationship between genotype and phenotype, including statistically highly significant differences in genotypic, additive (trend), general recessive and dominant models also for the placental function gene APOC3 (rs5128, G5163C) ( P < 0.00001).
approaching significancep < 1 × 10 −50.0× alphagold
Interestingly, only three AD risk variants exhibited genome‐wide ( p < 5 × 10 −8 ) significance or a level approaching significance ( p < 1 × 10 −5 ) with baseline memory performance, including rs429358 ( APOE , p = 2.03 × 10 −33 ), rs6733839 ( BIN1 , p = 3.96 × 10 −7 ), and rs4844610 ( CR1 , p = 8.43 × 10 −6 ).
highly significantp < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A three within-subjects RAnova (type of score × block × ear) showed a highly significant type of score effect, [ F (1.7,103) = 235, p < 0.00001, η p = 0.80, ω 2 = 0.22], with greater phonemes scores than word scores; block effect [ F (1,59) = 13, p < 0.00001, η p = 0.19, ω 2 = 0.022] with greater scores for the second block ( Figure 2A ), but no overall significant ear effect [ F (1,59) = 2.2, p = ns].