Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP-value = 2.6e -70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The nuclear ancestry was statistically different between the alleles of seven of the eight SNPs assessed by chi-squared test; m.1438, m.3197, m.4769, m.10398 and m.15043 were statistically highly significant (P-value = 2.6e -7 , 1.34e -6 , 2.45e -7 , 2.2e -16 2.2e -16 respectively) and m.3666 and m15218 were statistically significant (P-value = 0.002 and 0.008 respectively whereas m.9377 was not statistically different.
an overall trendp=2.74×10 -70.0× alphagold
A formal test for trend using ordinal measures (derived from quartile cut-points) supported an overall trend for increasing creatinine (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.26–1.60; p=2.74×10 -7 ) and UACR (HR: 1.55; 1.37–1.74; p=1.18×10 -12 ) and decreasing serum albumin (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.73–0.92; p=0.0005) and eGFR (HR: 0.71; 0.63–0.81; p=1.07×10 -7 ) to be associated with risk for all-cause mortality.
highly significantP = 2.74 × 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
3 a); (2) SNPs located at DNase I hypersensitive sites showed highly significant enrichment in several tissues, with colon identified as the most significant enrichment (OR = 5.10, P = 2.74 × 10 −7 ) (Fig. 3 b); (3) SNP enrichment in different chromatin state associated regions revealed that the transcribed regions were significantly enriched in different tissues (embryonic stem cell: OR = 6.18, P = 4.25 × 10 −8 ; liver: OR = 5.55, P = 5.26 × 10 −8 ; blood: OR = 5.13, P = 1.76 × 10 −7 ) (Fig. 3 c).
highly significantP = 2.8×10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We indeed find statistically highly significant negative correlations between the predicted tRNA/ribosome gene dosage ratio (Eq ( 21 )) and μ max ( Fig 3D ; slowly growing species: ρ = −0.44, P = 2.8×10 −7 , P ic = 6.0×10 −4 ; fast-growing species: ρ = −0.49, P = 4.3×10 −4 , P ic = 0.037) (see Text C in S1 File for the treatment of tRNA genes; these calculations assume a constant DNA replication rate k rep = 1000 s -1 across species, see Text A in S1 File for species-specific replication rate k rep ).
highly significantP = 2.9 × 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The model shows that after controlling for coexpression and intergenic distance, bipromoter status still has a highly significant effect on gene pair conservation ( P = 2.9 × 10 −7 ); the effect of orientation was indeed much stronger than the influence of the other two variables (data not shown).
highly significantP = 2.9 × 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
), a locus that had previously been considered by Australian[ 96 ] and Swedish researchers.[ 97 ] In a follow-up study involving collaborators from the UK and Belgium, these US researchers studied 197 multiplex families, 1,901 trio families, 1,515 cases and 3,204 unrelated controls and identified a highly significant association ( P = 2.9 × 10 −7 ) with rs6897932 a non-synonymous SNP (nsSNP) from exon 6 of the IL7R gene,[ 98 ] a result which was replicated in an accompanying paper from Swedish researchers.[ 99 ] This locus was thus the first non-MHC susceptibility gene to be identified in multiple sclerosis.
The genetic aspects of multiple sclerosis.
Ann Indian Acad Neurol · 2009 · PMC2824946
highly significantP = 2.97 × 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
After excluding genesets driven solely by one highly significant gene, two genesets remained significant: ‘GOBP: regulation of mRNA splicing via spliceosome’ ( GO:0048024 , 96 genes, P = 2.97 × 10 −7 ) and its parent term ‘GOBP: regulation of RNA splicing’ ( GO:0043484 , 142 genes, P = 3.50 × 10 −6 ) (Fig. 2d and Extended Data Fig. 3d ).
highly significantp = 3×10 -70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
On an ordinary scale progressing from control to sepsis to septic shock, Chymase levels displayed a strong and highly significant positive correlation (Spearman’s coefficient r s = 0,54, p = 3×10 -7 ), Ang 1 a significant negative correlation (r s = -0,27, p = 0,014), and Ang2 a weak but significant positive correlation (r s =0,23, p = 0,053) with sepsis severity (Supplemental Fig. 4 ).
highly significantp- value = 0.00000030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We used p-values defined by Lander and Kruglyak [ 17 ] to represent specific LOD score thresholds: (1) suggestive linkage with p value = 0.00074 and corresponding LOD = 2.2; (2) significant linkage with p-value = 0.00002 and corresponding LOD = 3.6; and (3) highly significant linkage with p- value = 0.0000003 and corresponding LOD = 5.4.