Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

approached significanceP = 0.0881.8× alpha
There was a weak negative correlation between COPE values and face dprime scores that approached significance when considering the first presentation run, r (63) = − 0.21, P = 0.088 (Supplementary Fig. 2C); there was no significant correlations between COPE values and face dprime scores for the second presentation run, r (63) = − 0.080, P = 0.527 (Supplementary Fig. 2D).
approached significancep = 0.0881.8× alpha
For positive learning, the correlation with ∆FRN amplitudes in the second half of the experiment approached significance in SAD ( r = −0.297 , p = 0.088), but no further effects were found in either SAD (all p s > 0.288) or HC (all p s > 0.168). ∆P3 In SAD, the ∆P3 in the second half of the observation condition ( r = 0.541 , p = 0.002) showed a significant positive relationship with learning from positive feedback, and ∆P3 amplitudes in the first half of the control condition also tended to correlate with positive learning ( r = 0.312 , p = 0.094).
trending toward significancep = 0.0881.8× alpha
The linear mixed model M5-(described in the Methods “Statistical analyses”)-based post-hoc comparisons of 31 P MRS parameters in the hippocampus, the motor cortex, and the premotor cortex between MMD patients and control family members revealed significantly ( p < 0.05) decreased levels of PCr (phosphocreatine)/ATP and PCr/P i (inorganic phosphate) and increased (trending toward significance; p = 0.088) levels of P i /ATP in all selected brain areas of MMD patients (Table 1 and Fig. 6 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0881.8× alphagold
When the analyses were limited to the dyads who had same examiners at pre- and post-interventions (n = 75 out of 140 dyads; 53.6%), the interaction effect between time and treatment condition remained marginally significant, potentially due to limited statistical power ( F [1, 183] = 2.94, p = 0.088 for child latency; F [1, 183] = 2.83, p = 0.095 for examiner latency).
marginally significantp = 0.0891.8× alphagold
A similar analysis was conducted for responder rate (one-point drop) on the numeric rating scale demonstrating a marginally significant effect for sessions x duration ( F (4,93) = 2.08, p = 0.089), indicating a trend that more people respond to 6 sessions of 20 minutes than to 6 sessions of 30 minutes ( t = 2.55, p = 0.024) (see Fig. 3 ).
marginally significantp value = 0.0891.8× alphagold
We found marginally significant associations (species richness/sampling effort Rho = 0.391, p value = 0.089; captured individuals/sampling effort Rho = 0.422, p value = 0.063), indicating that our measurements of taxonomic diversity are marginally affected by differences in sampling effort among sites, so we included sampling effort (log number sampling days) as a random effect of the model.
marginally significantp = 0.0891.8× alphagold
marginally insignificantp = 0.1132.3× alphagold
For the Maha season, it was estimated that the yield reduction in 2017 had worsen due to climate change in two models, relative to the yield in 2017 without climate change, although these estimates were marginally significant for APSIM (–0.19% and p = 0.089) and marginally insignificant for DSSAT (–0.19% and p = 0.113) (Fig. 5 c).
marginally significantp = 0.0891.8× alphagold
Growth, condition and somatic indices Although difference in final weight, and final biomass were marginally significant (final weight: LMM, F 4,10 = 2.74, p = 0.089, r 2 m = 0.13, r 2 c = 0.13; final biomass: ANOVA, F 1,4 = 3.66, p = 0.044) and final length did not differ among treatments (final length: LMM, F 4,10 = 1.87, p = 0.193, r 2 m = 0.09, r 2 c = 0.09), individually tracked than in AN-GBs and control feed (Table 2 ).