Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

trending towards significancep = 0.081.6× alphagold
For the trained leg, there was an increase of around 15% from M1 to M2 for the FE group (β = 1.32 (0.72)), but the change over time in comparison to the control group was only trending towards significance (t(50) = 1.81, p = 0.08) and only became significant at M3 (β = 1.80 (0.72)) (t(50) = 2.49, p = 0.02).
marginally significantp = 0.0801.6× alphagold
According to results of the multiple regression analysis (AIC = 2936.678, f 2 = 0.130, power (1- β ) = 0.186; see Table S2 ), the main effect of reward was marginally significant ( β = −13.346, SE = 7.430, 95% CI = −27.861–1.157, p = 0.080), suggesting that reward CERT in the reward-present conditions were marginally shorter than in the reward-absent conditions.
marginally significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
We found significant overall adaptation effects for pitch changes (relative to the adapters) of 0 semitones (two-tailed paired t-test, t (11) = 5.21, p < 0.001), 2 semitones ( t (11) = 2.37, p < 0.05), and 4 semitones ( t (11) = 4.49, p < 0.001) and a marginally significant effect for a pitch change of 9 semitones ( t (11) = 1.91, p = 0.08).
approaching significancep = 0.081.6× alphagold
Whilst none of the Mmp genes appeared in the p -value filtered list of differentially expressed genes (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3 , with p < 0.05), on examination of the unfiltered results Mmp-10 was the only one showing a large fold change (x10.2) that was approaching significance ( p = 0.08).
marginally significantp < 0.081.6× alphagold
There was a marginally significant interaction between Target Category and Saccade Accuracy (F 1,23 = 3.33, p < 0.08, η p 2 = 0.126), suggesting that the difference in latencies according to the target stimulus was more pronounced for correct (25 ms difference with 187 ± 17 ms for Face target and 212 ± 26 ms for Vehicle target) than error saccades (14 ms difference with 175 ± 30 ms for Face target and 189 ± 21 ms for Vehicle target).
approached significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
This effect was significant for oDBS60 (oDBS60 ventral: PD 19.66% ± 7.2, ET 40.46% ± 22.5, p = 0.0003; oDBS60 dorsal: PD 22.35% ± 7.98, ET 43.28% ± 27.7, p = 0.048) and oDBS30 at the ventral site (oDBS30 ventral: PD 15.86% ± 10.63, ET 31.18% ± 22.64, p = 0.0024, oDBS30 dorsal: PD 16.3% ± 13.0, ET 35.13% ± 26.36, p = 0.16), and approached significance for directional stimulation (dDBS60 dorsal: PD 19.42% ± 12.23, ET 42.24% ± 33.96, p = 0.08) (Fig. 4 A).