The reduction in pain intensity was marginally significant after adjusting for baseline values (P = 0.08) and there was no significant difference between the two groups after adjusting for all covariates (P = 0.11).
Excerpts
For the trained leg, there was an increase of around 15% from M1 to M2 for the FE group (β = 1.32 (0.72)), but the change over time in comparison to the control group was only trending towards significance (t(50) = 1.81, p = 0.08) and only became significant at M3 (β = 1.80 (0.72)) (t(50) = 2.49, p = 0.02).
According to results of the multiple regression analysis (AIC = 2936.678, f 2 = 0.130, power (1- β ) = 0.186; see Table S2 ), the main effect of reward was marginally significant ( β = −13.346, SE = 7.430, 95% CI = −27.861–1.157, p = 0.080), suggesting that reward CERT in the reward-present conditions were marginally shorter than in the reward-absent conditions.
showed a trendp = 0.08
Overall, the changes in serum FAM84B protein level showed a trend toward association with pathological response ( p = 0.08).
We found significant overall adaptation effects for pitch changes (relative to the adapters) of 0 semitones (two-tailed paired t-test, t (11) = 5.21, p < 0.001), 2 semitones ( t (11) = 2.37, p < 0.05), and 4 semitones ( t (11) = 4.49, p < 0.001) and a marginally significant effect for a pitch change of 9 semitones ( t (11) = 1.91, p = 0.08).
We also found marginally significant associations between childhood commuting and daily aerobic steps in 2018/2020 (B = 321.86, p = 0.08, 95% CI: −35.54 to 679.25), and daily aerobic steps during weekends in 2018/2020 (B = 464.69, p = 0.08, 95% CI: −61.84 to 991.07).
showed a trendp = 0.08
These TPJ-dmPFC connectivity beta weights differed significantly between the disgust and neutral conditions in the left hemisphere (t 18 = 3.54, p = 0.002), and showed a trend to significance in the right (t 18 = 1.82, p = 0.08) (Fig. 6B,C ).
However, HPLC-based quantification of nanoparticle retention confirms the increased retention of 1 μm nanoparticles is not quite statistically significant (p = 0.08), and 2 μm nanoparticles are not significantly different after I/R injury (p = 0.24).
approached significancep = 0.08
The main effect of MR approached significance (F (3, 528) = 2.33, p = 0.08, η 2 p = 0.01, Greenhouse-Geisser).
showed a trendp = 0.08
When stratifying by age cohort, IgM and IgG4 were higher in infants (1.5–3 months) from Manhiça compared to Kintampo (p = 0.003 and p = 0.042, respectively), and total IgG, IgG1 and IgG3 showed a trend in the same direction (p = 0.08, p = 0.09 and p = 0.08, respectively) (Fig. 4B ).
Whilst none of the Mmp genes appeared in the p -value filtered list of differentially expressed genes (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3 , with p < 0.05), on examination of the unfiltered results Mmp-10 was the only one showing a large fold change (x10.2) that was approaching significance ( p = 0.08).
close to significancep = 0.08
However, p-values were observed close to significance, with p = 0.08 observed, whilst the fitted slopes for both second and third dose were p = 0.13.
showed a trendP = 0.08
5A , P < 0.05) and showed a trend for lower total SCFA ( Fig. 5A , P = 0.08) compared to CON pigs.
There was a marginally significant interaction between Target Category and Saccade Accuracy (F 1,23 = 3.33, p < 0.08, η p 2 = 0.126), suggesting that the difference in latencies according to the target stimulus was more pronounced for correct (25 ms difference with 187 ± 17 ms for Face target and 212 ± 26 ms for Vehicle target) than error saccades (14 ms difference with 175 ± 30 ms for Face target and 189 ± 21 ms for Vehicle target).
borderline significanceP = 0.08
0.62, P = 0.25), while CNN showed higher AUC values than radiologists in nodules ≤ 5 mm with borderline significance (0.63 vs. 0.51, P = 0.08, Supplemental Table S3 ).
showed a trendP = 0.08
The number of red-listed staging spring migrants showed a trend indicating a positive correlation with the total cost of wetland management (b = 0.000009, F 1,31 = 3.28, P = 0.08).
close to significancep = 0.08
But there was a trend of lower values in the IUFD group with a difference close to significance (p = 0.08).
approached significancep = 0.08
Pain duration was less for individuals presenting with an Anchor as compared to the Ovate distribution (p = 0.04) and approached significance between the Anchor and Hook distribution (p = 0.08).
Consistent with these findings, biochemical assessment of complex-V (ATP synthase) activity revealed that LPS exposure reduced enzymatic activity relative to sham controls, with a strong trend toward significance ( p = 0.08; Fig.
plantarum exhibited a strong trend of more transitions to the upper zone ( p = 0.08) and spent significantly more time in the upper portion of the tank ( p = 0.01) ( Fig. 4C–F ).
approached significancep = 0.08
This effect was significant for oDBS60 (oDBS60 ventral: PD 19.66% ± 7.2, ET 40.46% ± 22.5, p = 0.0003; oDBS60 dorsal: PD 22.35% ± 7.98, ET 43.28% ± 27.7, p = 0.048) and oDBS30 at the ventral site (oDBS30 ventral: PD 15.86% ± 10.63, ET 31.18% ± 22.64, p = 0.0024, oDBS30 dorsal: PD 16.3% ± 13.0, ET 35.13% ± 26.36, p = 0.16), and approached significance for directional stimulation (dDBS60 dorsal: PD 19.42% ± 12.23, ET 42.24% ± 33.96, p = 0.08) (Fig. 4 A).
approached significancep = 0.08
The interaction ITI x Tone x Area x Group, which approached significance ( F (1, 29) = 2.66, p = 0.08), indicated that this pattern could be different across the groups.
The Pattern Recognition game had the greatest effect and the Categories game the least effect, with the difference between the two approaching significance (p = 0.08) ( Table 1 ).
When including data from participants administered task order 2 also, there was a similar pattern of results although the relationship between temperature and age narrowly missed statistical significance (p = 0.08) (Supplementary Information S4 ).
approached significancep = 0.080
Similarly, in the numerosity 20, there was a significant difference between 4 × 4 and 1 × 1 divider trials ( t (19) = 3.46, p = 0.008), and a difference that approached significance between 4 × 4 and 2 × 2 divider trials ( t (19) = 1.85, p = 0.080).