Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

A tendency towards significance was found for the ACC in delta band when comparing post-NS and post-SC (p < 0.08, higher outcoming causal flow of information for the post-NS as compared to the post-SC, Fig. 5B ; details about CFI normalization in Materials and Methods - ‘Cortical hubs net Causal Flow of Information’).
approached significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
Accuracy for pseudowords (250 trials) had a slightly higher correlation with WJ-Word-ID (r = 0.86, p < 0.00001) than did accuracy for real words (r = 0.74, p < 0.00001), and this difference in correlation approached significance based on William’s test (p = 0.08; Fig. 1 right panel).
Rapid online assessment of reading ability.
Sci Rep · 2021 · PMC7973435
almost significantlyP = 0.081.6× alpha
Minimum 87 Sr/ 86 Sr values were almost significantly lower for LA-MC-ICP-MS (0.7096 ± 0.0008 SD) than for solution (0.7099 ± 0.0008 SD; Wilcoxon signed-rank test: n = 20, Z = 1.82, P = 0.08) and maximum 87 Sr/ 86 Sr values were significantly higher (respectively 0.7115 ± 0.0015 SD and 0.7108 ± 0.0011 SD; n = 20, Z = − 2.55, P < 0.05).
marginally significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
neutral) stimuli, in both visual and olfactory modalities, decreased d’ and thus impeded discrimination between healthy and unhealthy food [ t (15) = −3.16, p < 0.01; disgust d’ = 1.91 (0.78); neutral d’ = 2.11 (0.62)] whereas an opposite, marginally significant trend emerged for the social stimuli: social disgust (vs. neutral) stimuli increased d’ [ t (15) = 1.89, p = 0.08; disgust d’ = 2.11 (0.72); neutral d’ = 1.98 (0.77)] and thus improved food healthiness discrimination.
marginally significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
For salivary cortisol, a significant main effect of time was identified, with a peak in cortisol level in the final sample (SR4) as compared to post “rest1” sample [F(3,159) = 2.66, p < 0.05; 54 participants with sufficient saliva samples were included in this analysis]; Tukey’s HSD post-hoc analyses revealed a marginally significant peak in cortisol level in the final sample (SR4) as compared to post “rest 1” sample (SR1, p = 0.08).