As in the main experiment, the ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of Congruence [F(1,20) = 20.09, MSE = 1792.32, p < .0003, η p 2 = .50], reflecting a higher percentage of antisaccades in the incongruent trials (10.56 ± 1.64%) compared to the congruent trials (6.03 ± 1.26%), and a nearly significant effect of SOA [F(1,20) = 20.09, MSE = 513.23, p = .063, η p 2 = .16], reflecting a higher percentage of antisaccades when the distracting gaze preceded (9.51 ± 1.81%) the instruction cue onset, rather than followed it (7.08 ± 1.13%).
Excerpts
showed a trendp = 0.063
The comparisons between Points B and C showed no significant main effect, however the interaction showed a trend of significant [F(1, 282) = 3.485, p = 0.063, η 2 = 0.012], indicating that during Ramadan there was a dissociation between the direction of the changes in the Stress scores between females and males.
Although the rostral-caudal length of the opening area showed no correlation with the learning rate (r = − 0.044, p = 0.934), the right-left length showed an almost significant negative correlation (r = − 0.787, p = 0.063).
For the group in Saudi Arabia, a single 7-day cosine model approximates these average relative daily rhythm-adjusted mean value (Midline Estimating Statistic of Rhythm, MESOR) with near significance ( P = 0.063), while a two-component model including the 3.5-day term reaches significance ( P = 0.045).
borderline significancep = 0.063
Prior CIN was associated with renal function decline at a borderline significance level (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 0.96–4.09; p = 0.063).
Target-location main effect was close to being significant (F(1,13) = 4.143, p = 0.063, η p 2 = 0.24), indicating that participants were slightly more sensitive for the targets located on their left side compared to their right side.
The number of successes out of 6 initial probe trials in individual animals was marginally significant ( p = 0.063) in 4 conditions, and significant ( p = 0.009) in one condition (Supplementary Fig. 3 ).
These results showed a significant overall interaction across stimulus types, F(2,52) = 3.616, p = .034, η 2 p = 0.122, such that the CS+ previously paired with the safety signal elicited significantly higher SCR than the CS-, t(26) = 2.502, p = .019, 95% CI[0.007,0.721], indicating a fear response was reinstated, while the CS+ previously paired with the social support reminder did not, t(26)=-0.633, p = .532, 95% CI[-0.210,0.397], indicating no reinstated fear response.Additionally, the CS+ previously paired with the safety signal elicited SCR marginally higher (but nearing significance) compared to the CS+ previously paired with the social support reminder, t(26) = 1.943, p = .063, 95% CI[-0.018,0.623] (see Fig. 5 c).
Moreover, the thymus weights of the PCE offspring on PND 49 also showed a decreasing trend ( P = 0.063, P = 0.057, Fig. 3H ).
When we compared matched (only red or green) to dichoptic colored filters, the results were near significance (p = 0.063).
Model 3, with a classification accuracy of 0.63, reached marginal significance, t (48) = 1.91, p = 0.063, Cohen’s d = 0.27, however, 1000 permutation p = 0.03 and an AUC of 0.59, indicating that the accuracy was significantly higher than the random level.
There was no significant main effect of ASD likelihood status on awakenings (Waldχ 2 = 1.116, p = 0.291), but there was a significant interaction between visit and ASD likelihood status (Waldχ 2 = 10.777, p = 0.005); post-hoc tests revealed no significant group difference in awakenings at 5 months (Waldχ 2 = 1.773, p = 0.183), but a significant difference at 10 months with infants at EL waking more often (Waldχ 2 = 5.068, p = 0.024), and a marginally significant difference, in the same direction, at 14 months (Waldχ 2 = 3.465, p = 0.063).
borderline significanceP = 0.063
Similar results were also observed in patients without adjuvant TACE treatment although only borderline significance was reached (HR: 0.78; 95%CI: 0.59–1.03; P = 0.063).
borderline significanceP = 0.0632
Defects in Svp precursor-determining cell divisions are also rescued, albeit with borderline significance ( P = 0.0632).
The CSA at level 3 measured by one reviewer correlated significantly with the 10 m walk test time (r = 0.5789, p = 0.0382), and that measured by the other reviewer showed a near-significant result ( p = 0.0638) with a similar trend.
After adjusting for confounding factors, the overall effect in the NIHSS score model remained significant (adjusted OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.40, P = 0.0361), and the overall effect in the GCS model was nearly significant (adjusted OR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.29, P = 0.0639), with the direction of the effect consistently suggesting an increased risk (Table 3 ).
One fly line, TH-F2-Gal4 > Shi ts , had a significant caffeine-induced sleep reduction only in males; however, there was a strong trend towards sleep loss in females as well (p = 0.0639 by ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparisons).
Here we found a strong trend for the association between TSH with ADHD diagnosis in children ( p = 0.064).
marginally non-significantp = 0.064
For the Walking Capacity only model, the difference was statistically significant for medical technicians ( p = 0.026), while the result for medical beds was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.064), suggesting walking capacity plays a more substantial role in access to human resources than physical infrastructure.
approached significancep = 0.064
The comparison between tACS and tDCS ( M = 6.8, SD = 5.3) approached significance ( p = 0.064, 95% CI = [− 0.01, 0.59]), with more errors committed in the former group.
showed a trendp = 0.064
The COI marker showed a trend towards an increase in higher average RNA Shannon Diversity index values compared to the DNA template ( p = 0.064) (Fig. 4 D).
showed a trendp = 0.064
Furthermore, left SII showed a trend for a positive relationship with SPS (r = 0.40, p = 0.064).
marginally non-significantp = 0.064
This difference between sexes is reflected in marginally non-significant ( p = 0.064) interaction Sex : Additional weight (Table 1 ).
showed a trendp = 0.064
Compared to patients anesthetized with propofol, those receiving sevoflurane showed a trend towards numerically lower absolute phase shift (β = -46.0%, CI = [-71.9%; + 3.9%], p = 0.064).
Attention modulated trust levels for high and neutral trust faces (β high = 0.31 ± 0.091, t = 3.37, p = 0.001; β neutral = 0.40 ± 0.091, t = 4.38, p < 10 −4 ), with a nonsignificant trend for low trust faces (β low = 0.17 ± 0.091, t = 1.87, p = 0.064).