Excerpts

There was a marginally significant, positive correlation between MHI and dock abundance in 2000 (Table 5 , χ2(1) = 3.54, p = 0.06).

There was a trend toward significance in the same direction for TMTA (time) (p = 0.06).

Among SM children, those who had a second SM episode showed a trend toward lower plasma sEPCR both at initial admission and at 6-month follow-up compared to those without repeated SM ( P = 0.06 for both).

After including household exposures (Model 2, Table 7 ), older age (OR 8.2, 95% CI 1.62–41.4 for 8–11 year olds compared to 0–3 year olds) remained associated with increased odds, and households with soy bean crops (OR 0.035, 95% CI 0.0036–0.35) had substantially lower odds, but households with peanut crops had higher odds, though with marginal significance (p = 0.06).

The difference in physical role was the only marginally significant ( P = 0.06) with slight improvement in SA group (15, 95%CI, − 1–30).

The sum of all visible light only showed a trend towards an increase in reflection from a Stikem glued yellow plate compared to a D41 glued yellow plate ( P = 0.06).

approached significance (RT 40.3 ± 16.7% and SDB 9.2 ± 19.7%; p = 0.06).

The association with cg25390787 (located in promotor region) was only borderline significant (p = 0.06) consistently for both atherosclerosis measures.

Further analysis of the serum lipoprotein content at the experimental endpoint showed a trend towards decreased LDL levels for the Ki16425 treated mice as compared to the control ( Fig. 2c , P = 0.06).

In our study there was a borderline significant correlation between high Ki67 expression in the metastasis and high sTK1 levels ( P = 0.06) supporting this suggestion.

Experiment 2: landscape-scale rat exclusion On average, we captured 50.4 ± 26.8% fewer skinks per site per day on unmanipulated (rat-present) sites compared to rat-removal sites, but the effect of treatment was not quite significant ( F (1,6) = 5.34, p = 0.06, Fig. 3 ).

The parents exhibited more-vigilant behaviour in the nest-box with an enlarged entrance (2.07 ± 0.41%) than in that with a control entrance (0.90 ± 0.41%), but this was marginally significant (mixed model, nest F 1,20.1 = 4.12, P = 0.06; playback F 1,21.3 = 0.28, P = 0.60; nest × playback F 1,20.9 = 2.93, P = 0.10; temperature F 1,36.0 = 2.05, P = 0.16; brood F 1,20.5 = 0.88, P = 0.36; Fig. 2b ).

Two more upregulated proteins involved in lipid storage, SYAP1 and RAB18, were very close to significance ( p < 0.06).

When using the multivariate model as described for alpha diversity above, the impact of beta-lactam PK remained non-significant ( p = 0.411), and the impact of antibiotic spectrum still approached significance ( p = 0.060).

In males, although not quite statistically significant, an exposure effect was suggested for number of open arm entries (F (3, 58) = 2.617, p = 0.06; η 2 = 0.12; Fig. 6A ).

Male mice in VCR group showed a trend of increased bladder wet weight compared to the control group (36.0 ± 3.0 vs. 29.6 ± 1.8 mg, p = 0.06), but not in female mice (16.6 ± 0.8 vs. 17.6 ± 1.0 mg, p = 0.43) (Fig. 1 C).

The Pearson correlations approached significance for the young insulin sensitive and resistant groups (r = 0.12, p < 0.060).

Larval dry weight: wet weight was significantly affected by CO 2 (p = 0.003, F 2 = 1.66) and the interaction between CO 2 and tide was marginally significant (p = 0.060, F 4 = 2.26).

The differences between C-MHE and C-NMHE patients in CVLT total learning remain significant; there is a trend toward significance (p = 0.06) on delayed recall when comparing C-MHE and C-NMHE patients, probably due to the lower number of patients in this sample, reaching significance when more number of patients are included, as shown in Table 1 .

While we found that the ratio of brain volume to ICV is not significantly different overall, there is a possible trend ( p = .06) which further analysis showed to be primarily among men ( p = .08) compared with women ( n = .4).

Analysis of synchronization variability as determined by the standard deviation of tap-to-tone asynchronies revealed a trend towards significance of factor time ( F (1, 17) = 3.91, p = 0.06), while neither stimulation ( F (2, 34) = 0.45, p = 0.64) nor the stimulation x time interaction were found to be significant ( F (2, 34) = 0.048, p = 0.91).

2 b and Supplementary Table S3 online), but the interaction effect between groups and 1 week after intervention was marginally significant, a consistent trend with STAI-SA (β = 1.95, SE = 1.03, p = 0.06).

Instead, we find a marginally significant effect in the opposite direction—people select the aesthetic target on Trial 1 marginally more often b = −0.21, SE = 0.11, t = −1.90, p = 0.06.

The proportion of both age groups declines back to early Epipaleolithic levels in the EPPNB and remains low through the MPPNB (significant difference between NAT&PPNA and E&MPPNB fawns; t = −1.92; df = 7; p = 0.05; and marginally insignificant difference between NAT&PPNA and E&MPPNB juveniles; t = −1.95; df = 4; p = 0.06).

For RLC, the association was negative (marginal significance, p = 0.06) (Fig. 1 D), while for logCort AUC it was positive, although not statistically significant.