The mean orientation error for the SR case (1.7 ± 1.5 deg) was significantly lower than the Clin (8.0 ± 5.8 deg; p = 0.019) and approaching significance for RS (3.8 ± 2.2 deg; p = 0.053) case.
Excerpts
A main effect was found for MMSE score and the interaction with twin status was only marginally significant (GLM interaction term zygosity status × MMSE score: z = 1.933 p < 0.053).
showed a trendp = 0.053
Birds from high-density pens showed a trend to approach cue types faster than birds from low-density pens (F 1,6 = 5.767, p = 0.053; Table 1 ).
Nurses aged more than 30 reported higher levels of anxiety than those aged 30 or less with a marginal significance ( p = 0.053).
almost reached significancep=0.053
In fact, among 15 cases with smear results of more than 10 acid-fast bacilli per 100 fields in our study, the difference in the quantitative response of TB2 compared to that of TB1 almost reached significance (p=0.053).
However, results on the Control group showed a significant moderate negative correlation r = −0.579, p = 0.048 between change in positive affect and RT change for the detection of anger, and a marginally significant negative correlation (moderate), r = −0.570, p = 0.053 between change in positive affect and RT change for the detection of happiness.
a trend toward significancep = 0.053
Additionally, a trend toward significance was observed for lymph node status ( p = 0.053, Spearman r = 0.230), with high YB-1 expression being more common in pN-positive tumors, overall supporting the survival data from the TCGA cohort.
close to significancep = 0.053
The effect of g on the total LCD was not significant, although close to significance threshold (F(2.001, 30.009) = 2.174, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.038) and associated with a significant g *group effect (F(4.001,30.009) = 4.922, p = 0.004, η 2 = 0.173) and no significant group effect (F2,15) = 2.542, p = 0.112, η 2 = 0.133).
At 23 °C the difference resulted marginally significant ( p = 0.053 and d = 0.37), whereas at 19 °C no significant difference was reported by the test ( p = 0.42).
There was also a marginally significant group x temporal interval F 11,1298 = 1.778, p = 0.053 , ηp2 = 0.014, Observed Power = 0.865 interaction term.
a trend toward significancep = 0.053
In addition, a trend toward significance was found in ATF6 (Fig. 8 B, p = 0.053).
3 A and Table 2 ), while a near-significant relationship between pure-tone average and tau SUVR ( P = 0.053) (Fig. 3 B and Table 2 ).
borderline significancep = 0.053
2 ) as a dependent variable (Table 7 ) and controlling for the other predictors, the variable AGE highlighted a borderline significance and a week evidence that an increasing age was correlated to an decreasing value of IM [ β = − 0.134, Wald χ 2 (1) = 3.751, p = 0.053].
just missed significancep = 0.053
The difference in reaction times between faces and cars just missed significance ( p = 0.053).
Furthermore, a marginally significant interaction between vs. within treatments was found for condition factor (K) (F (1,15) = 4.40, p = 0.053).
After consistent trials, the conflict effect was slightly greater in the left brain region than in the right, with a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.053).
A nearly significant trend for differential cueing benefits across participants with versus without reliable cue discrimination was found ( t (21) = 2.05, p = 0.053, Cohen’s d = 0.95).
At 24 h, there was marginal significance (p = 0.053), while AIC (133.72) of the model with quadratic term was smaller than AIC (135.45) of the linear model.
showed a trendp = 0.053
In a two-way mixed-effect ANOVA on d-prime and criterion, there was no significant main effect for “Perturbation” or any interaction between “Perturbation” and “Hemifield” in both monkeys (in M2, the interaction for the criterion showed a trend, F(1, 12) = 4.59, p = 0.053, see Suppl.
There was a statistical trend suggesting that NS scores were higher for younger versus older adults, t (153.74) = 1.950, p = 0.053 (equal variances not assumed).
The Group × Cue Validity interaction just failed to reach statistical significance ( F (1, 37) = 4.00, p = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.10).
a trend toward significancep = 0.053
The Group × Condition interaction for the M1 group compared to the sham shows only a trend toward significance (Table 1 ; M1: F(5,120) = 2.26, p = 0.053; M2: F(5,114) = 1.48, p = 0.2), suggesting that group differences may vary across task difficulty levels.
NH 4 + immobilization ranged from 0 to 3.74 mg N kg −1 d −1 (with an average of 1.8 mg N kg −1 d −1 ) in southern soils and from 0 to 2.58 mg N kg −1 d −1 (with an average of 0.59 mg N kg −1 d −1 ) in northern soils, but the difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.053).
For NfL, there was a statistical trend towards a higher concentration in boxers compared to patients with SCD (δ = 0.492 [CI = 0.003, 0.791], p = .053).
The suPAR levels at hospital discharge showed a borderline significant association with the rate of unplanned 90-day readmission in our cohort (OR per 1 ng/mL suPAR increase 1.12 [1.00–1.24], p = 0.053).