Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp =.051.0× alphagold
Primary outcome At Week 7, LM/S did not demonstrate significant improvement compared to CAU in depressive symptoms (adjusted mean difference = − 1.21, p =.80, d = 0.24), while the PLM showed a marginally significant reduction relative to CAU (adjusted mean difference = − 3.96, p =.05, d = 0.78).
highly significantP < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Effect of chitosan forms and concentrations on vegetative growth (S1 and S2) Statistical overview As detailed in Table 1 , the two-way ANOVA indicated that the chitosan form (F) was the main influence on growth, having a highly significant effect ( P < 0.05) on all growth parameters except for branch number in Season (1) Conversely, the concentration (C) did not have a significant effect on growth parameters ( P > 0.05).
highly significantp < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
TC showed a highly significant positive correlation with SOC (r = 0.72; p < 0.05), DOC (r = 0.78; p < 0.05), Zn (r = 0.70; p < 0.05), Mn (r = 0.72; p < 0.05), MBC (r = 0.80; p < 0.05) and DHA (r = 0.68; p < 0.05), and also exhibited a positive correlation with soil pH (r = 0.33; p < 0.05), TIC (r = 0.55; p < 0.05), DTPA-Cu (r = 0.59; p < 0.05) and Fe (r = 0.47; p < 0.05).
nominally significantp<0.051.0× alphagold
Pooled analysis Metabolites with nominally significant differences (p<0.05) and trends (0.05<p<0.10) between screening and Year 3 within the FP and AP groups Metabolites that were nominally different are reported in Table 2 with circulating concentrations reported in Table S1.
marginal significancep = 0.051.0× alphagold
Each 1-SD increase in log-transformed irisin was significantly associated with higher odds of MetS in Model 1 (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.08–1.69; p = 0.009) and Model 3 (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.02–1.80; p = 0.04), while showing marginal significance in Model 2 (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.00–1.74; p = 0.05).
For example, the p-value for age in the univariate analysis was 0.133, which did not reach statistical significance ( P < 0.05), while the p-value for retinopathy was 0.059, which was close to statistical significance but was not selected as a significant independent risk factor in the multivariate analysis.
a decreasing trendp > 0.051.0× alphagold
2 E-G, the mRNA expression of Claudin-1 , Occludin , and ZO-1 in the colon of LOP group showed a decreasing trend compared with those in CK group ( p > 0.05). γ -PGAM treatment enhanced the expression of Claudin-1 , Occludin , and ZO-1 genes at the mRNA levels compared with the LOP group, albeit there was an upward trend observed in γ-PGAL and γ-PGAH groups( p < 0.05 or < 0.01).