Excerpts

A plane of best fit again exhibited tilt along the minor axis (slope = −1.8 × 10 −2 units/μm for minor axis, 2.4 × 10 −3 units/μm for major axis) that did not achieve significance (p = 0.05).

All parameters (Chitinase, Invertase, Protein) showed highly significant differences (p < 0.05), indicating that the effects of treatment type and formulation are statistically significant.

Interventions Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) demonstrated a borderline significant association with recurrence ( p = 0.050).

In multivariable analysis, tumor subtypes and continuous SUVmax remained an independent variable associated with high TIL levels, and NG was marginally significant ( p = 0.050) for predicting high TIL levels.

Among interaction terms, the AC (cutting speed × PIUP) interaction is highly significant across all responses ( p < 0.05), underscoring the strong dependence of machining behavior on the combined influence of speed and ultrasonic power input.

In general, the EGCG3′′Me contents showed an increasing trend with the leaf maturity from the bud and first leaf to the sixth leaf to a certain extent, and the content of EGCG3′′Me in the bud and first leaf was lower (p < 0.05) than that of other parts of the tea shoots, whereas EGCG, ECG, and TC levels in the different stages of leaf maturity presented a reverse trend.

Similarly, the correlation between OSPAN scores and pupil dilation approached significance ( p = 0.05 for the left eye; p = 0.062 for the right eye), suggesting a potential trend toward significance.

Associations between biomarker levels and post-interventional clinical and radiological variables Patients with post-interventional ASPECTS values < 8 (n = 21) showed higher serum levels of β-syn (p = 0.0014) and GFAP (p = 0.008) compared to patients with ASPECTS ≥ 8 (n = 9), whereas the increase of NfL was of borderline significance (p = 0.05) (Supplementary Fig. 2 ).

TNF-α showed an increasing trend in the BD + L. reuteri group, and chemokine IL-8 mRNA exhibited no intergroup differences (P > 0.05).

A post-hoc power analysis was conducted using G*Power 3.1 to estimate the observed power for between-group comparisons that were nominally significant (uncorrected p < 0.05) but did not survive the FDR correction.

The statistical adequacy of the developed models was validated through ANOVA, with all three response models found to be highly significant ( p < 0.05), as shown in Table 3 .

ALBI grade was marginally significant ( P = 0.05, HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.99–2.04, Fig. 3C ).

The trend of the models’ WUE (positive trend) and CUE (some models showed a positive trend, while others showed a negative trend) is significant (Mann-Kendall p < 0.05) for CO 2 fertilization and N deposition scenarios and shows contrasting results for the climate scenario with about half of the models showing no significant trend with time (Tables S1 and S2 ).

Although there was an increasing trend, a significant increase for MRSA colonization was not observed ( p > 0.05) (Fig. 1 ).

Moreover, the correlation between NASA-TLX scores and DFA α1 approached significance (ρ = 0.32, p =.05).

We considered associations as nominally significant at P < 0.05.

Musicianship exhibited borderline significance in affecting tapping variability (χ 2 (1) = 3.84, p = 0.050).

Seventy CpGs (in 41 genes) showed nominally significant associations ( P < 0.05) with AD-ND codependence in both AAs and EAs.

Average methylation values for each cytosine within the Fr_BAG5_APOPT1 fragment by group and haplotype and nominally significant p -values ( p < 0.05) for every analysis conducted are given in Supplementary Table S5 .

ANOVA analysis was performed to statistically verify the model, which illustrates a statistically highly significant model ( p < 0.05) and reasonable values of R 2 (95.09% for determination and 90.89% for adjusted).

The P-value reflects the regression effect of the parameter 53 – 55 , P < 0.0001 means the regression effect of the factor is extremely significant, 0.0001 ≤ P ≤ 0.05 means the regression effect of the factor is significant, and P ≥ 0.05 means the regression effect of the factor is insignificant 56 – 58 .

The association for obesity became borderline significant ( p = 0.05), with the adjusted odds ratio suggesting potentially lower odds of exercise (AOR = 0.81, 95% CI [0.66, 1.00]); the confidence interval just touching 1.00 indicates this finding is at the threshold of statistical significance.

Colocalisation We employed the Bayesian colocalisation method coloc 69 to assess whether the nominally significant (p-value < 0.05) MR effects observed for drug targets were indicative of causation or potentially confounded by linkage disequilibrium (LD) 70 .

For NMW (analysed separately), we found a positive marginally significant association between palate length and Q/A ratio (r = 0.79, p = 0.05) (Fig. 2C ).

In contrast to the OTR, the WVTR values exhibit a decreasing trend ( p < 0.05) as the concentration of ZnO-NPs increases.