Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

barely significantp = 0.0470.9× alphagold
Total allometry (calculated as a linear regression of Procrustes coordinates onto log transformed centroid size (CS)) in the RV species-averages dataset was significant (p = 0.0011) and accounted for almost 14% of total variability; while the evolutionary allometry (calculated as a regression of independent contrasts of shape onto independent contrasts of log transformed CS) was around 10% and was barely significant (p = 0.047).
marginally significantp = 0.0481.0× alphagold
PWA during rest was significantly larger compared to both memory (t(77) = 4.152, p < 0.001, d = 0.473) and control tasks (t(77) = 3.844, p < 0.001, d = 0.438), while the difference between memory and control tasks was marginally significant (t(77) = 2.007, p = 0.048, d = 0.229).
marginally significantp =.0481.0× alphagold
For the SI group, the model was: \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:logit\left(P\right(Y=1\left)\right)=-0.46+0.10X$$\end{document} showing a marginally significant positive slope ( p =.048), while the intercept was not significant ( p =.13).
marginally significantp = 0.0481.0× alphagold
Results Experiment 1 Recall performance on trivia questions A 2 × 2 ANOVA on free recall rates with the factors age (young, older) and state EC (high, low) revealed no main effect of age (F(1,52) = 1.05, p = 0.31, η 2 p = 0.02), but a significant main effect of state EC (F(1,52) = 165.18, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.76), and a marginally significant interaction of age × state EC (F(1,52) = 4.11, p = 0.048, η 2 p = 0.07).