Excerpts

Nonetheless, a decreasing trend of toward PMA-induced NETosis was seen in the ACB group, with a significant drop in the end the surgery ( p = 0.0261, REML analysis with Šídák's multiple comparisons test, Fig. 3 B).

However, a few of its linkage disequilibrium (LD) proxies (r 2 > 0.77 in Europeans) were nominally significant in the meta-analysis (results for the leading variant rs9271588, OR [95% CI] = 1.20 [1.02–1.41], p = 0.027).

Correlation between the same parameter and “time to reach 30% dilation” was not significant for HC (r = 0.292; p = 0.24): and moderately significant for ADD (p = 0.027; r = 0.550).

The Mahalanobis distance between the Class I group and the Class III group was 1.28 but did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.027), and a smaller and non-significant Mahalanobis distance was found between the Class II and the Class III group.

Our results for MCP-3, SCF and CXCL9 did not replicate in the Finnish population (P > 0.05 in the Finnish cohort for our top SNVs) and our result for TNFB was only nominally significant (P = 0.027).

Expression levels showed a trend for higher EGFP expression in AAVrh10-injected mice which was significant only in lumbar roots ( p = 0.0274) (Suppl.

We analyzed 307 PTB cases and 2,826 controls from the Latino population from the Genes-environments and Admixture in Latino Americans babies (GALA II) study 67 and found that variant rs17591250 on chromosome 1 was modestly significant (OR = 0.7, P = 0.02775;, however, we observed a flip in the odds ratio (OR) for this population.

Furthermore, primary lung cancer patients demonstrated a nominally significant increased odds of having made a serious smoking quit attempt compared to both MSC-1 and LSC-1 controls, with odds ratios of 1.44 (p = 0.028) and 1.42 (p = 0.026), respectively.

While overall fit statistics remained unchanged the DIFFTEST was highly significant, indicating a clear sex difference ( X 2 (4) = 10.95, p = 0.028) when all the paths were considered.

In Group 2 the SRT scores in the ATm an ATnm tests were statistically significantly different [t(19) = 5.0, p < 0.001, effect size = 1.497, power = 0.99], while the difference between the scores in the ATm and the A tests [t(19) = 2.54, p = 0.02, effect size = 0.887, power = 0.98), as well as between A and ATnm showed a trend for significance [t(19) = 2.4, p = 0.028, effect size = 0.737, power = 0.94).

There was a significant trend toward an increase in the incidence of severe DKA over time [Odds ratio (OR) = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.003–1.05, p = 0.028], with an average increase of about 3% per year during the study period.

Yet, the women/men difference for receiving Other pay in the seventh model (including academic age) is barely statistically significant ( p = .028).

The average duration of MHW events that crossed mortality thresholds over the past 60 years showed an increasing but insignificant trend in Norway (0.17 ± 0.16 days year −1 ; LM: R 2 = 0.04, p = 0.305) and an increasing trend in the eastern USA (0.20 ± 0.09 days year −1 ; R 2 = 0.13, p = 0.029).

The group effect on tree hierarchy just fell short of significance ( t = 2.61, p = 0.029), suggesting a trend for a loss of balance between large scale integration and overload prevention in ASD compared to TD group.

The effect of xanthurenate on eGFR was nominally significant (effect estimate = − 0.0086; p = 2.9e−02).

However, a positive trend in the level of testosterone was observed in a dose-dependent manner (ANOVA-trend analysis, repeated measure: P = 0.029).

This cluster also passed the thresholds after adjusting for the Euler number while the PSI-SA cluster only approached significance ( p = 0.029).

In contrast, % OD-positive cells were left only weakly significant ( p = 0.029), while bSPS showed no significance anymore ( p = 0.13).

3b , there was a significant trend towards increased dynamic MAE through the pre-test day to the 3 rd training day ( t (14) = 2.43, p = 0.029, linear trend analysis), hinting that attention might be a not-to-be-ignored factor contributing the changes in perceptual aftereffects in repeated adaptation.

5 a); but for grouped stimuli the correlation was significant, and remained close to significance after correcting for multiple comparison (α = 0.5/2: r = − 0.56, p = 0.029, LogBF = 0.54; Fig. 5 b).

4 b) approached significance (F(2,38) = 3.907, p = 0.029, η 2 = 0.171), with a significant increase from I 1 to I 6 in highs (F(1,14) = 6.909, p = 0.02), but not in mediums and lows.

The gene expression of k-Ras displayed an increasing trend, with significant effects observed in the high-dose group ( Fig. 3A ; P = 0.029).

Also, the change in slope was increasing despite being insignificant which resulted in a significant trend of 0.335 cases/month during the COVID-19 period (p-value = 0.029) (Fig. 2 G).

This means that the effect of high RLE score on either BSI-DEP or BSI-ANX was in average 4 times higher in TT compared to CC genotype individuals. The rs3219151xRLE interaction effect was nominally significant on DEP (p = 0.029, FDR-q = 0.077) and showed a trend on SUIC (p = 0.093, FDR-q = 0.186) but none of them survived correction for multiple testing.

NMSS total score showed a weak trend toward a negative association with AUC ( r = − 0.299, p = 0.0292, q = 0.051), but this did not survive correction for multiple comparison.