Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally insignificantP = 0.020.4× alphagold
However, there was a marginally insignificant positive correlation between PPORT and CVD (r = 0.38, P = 0.02, P values were corrected with the Bonferroni method, and a value less than 0.01 was considered statistically significant).
However, the associations for the vmPFC and left anterior insula did not reach statistical significance (pairwise correlations: left striatum, r = − 0.36, p = 0.02; right striatum, r = − 0.35, p = 0.03; left anterior insula, r = − 0.19, p = 0.23; right anterior insula, r = − 0.35, p = 0.02; vmPFC, r = − 0.22, p = 0.12).
marginally significantp = 0.020.4× alphagold
One-way ANOVA comparing scores between each odour group indicated no significant differences in LSAS on day 1 (pre-treatment) and SOS scores, whereas marginally significant differences in age were recorded, with Holm corrected post-hoc tests indicating a difference between the fear and clean air condition ( p = 0.02).
modest significancep = 0.020.4× alphaqualifiedgold
2 D) also increases over time, where again the change is dramatic in the PANC1 + MRC5 AOCs (increase in mean size of about 4 times in 24 h, p < 0.01) and less so in the PANC1 + PSC AOCs (factor of 1.8 increase with modest significance of p = 0.02 over the same time period).
narrowly missed significancep = 0.020.4× alphagold
Moderate deficiency (10–20) showed a strong trend toward worse OS that narrowly missed significance. Liver metastasis was independently associated with significantly worse OS (adjusted HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.06–1.91, p = 0.02), consistent with published literature where HRs for liver metastasis typically range from 1.4 to 2.0.
marginally significantp-value = 0.0230.5× alphagold
Using Student's t-test revealed that all values are significantly different although for the plus-strand coded promoters (in Figure 5b ) the middle-range promoter-cis values (the 301–450 range promoters paired with the 301–450 range cis elements) have only a marginally significant (p-value = 0.023) difference when compared to the 601–750 range promoters paired with the 301–450 range cis elements (i.e. middle orange bar vs. the middle purple bar in Figure 5b ).