Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp <0.12.0× alphagold
Analyses of the variability of reaction time (measured as a subject's standard deviation of reaction time) revealed a marginally significant main effect of timbre [ F (3,81) = 2.20, p <0.1]; post-hoc tests determined that response times were marginally more variable during flute-tone discrimination than during pure-tone discrimination ( Table 2 ; p <0.08); no other significant differences were found.
borderline significantP-value<0.12.0× alphagold
In contrast, analysis of each individual het-c allele class resulted in a significant negative D score for het-c2 and het-c3 (P-value<0.05, all P-values for Tajima's D scores calculated using assumed beta distribution [50] ) and a borderline significant (P-value<0.1) score for het-c1 , suggesting that each het-c allele class is also under directional selection.
approached significancep = .102.0× alpha
The tendency for overlapping identity-concepts within the strongly self-defining Christian network to be interconnected with all other nodes in the network was somewhat greater (B = 1.27, SE = 0.05; 95% CI: 1.18, 1.38) than the weakly self-defining network (B = 1.19, SE = 0.05; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.29), which approached significance ( z = 1.26, p = .10; see “second model” notes in S7 Appendix ).
marginally significantP ≤ 0.102.0× alphagold
Results based on OLS tended to show negative associations between water-stable aggregates and measures of plant biomass while results based on GLS found a mixture of no appreciable associations, marginally significant (0.05 < P ≤ 0.10), and significant (α = 0.05) negative associations between water-stable aggregates and plant properties.
marginally non-significantp = 0.102.0× alpha
The proportion of records occurring in winter (December, January and February) was generally higher in larger towns though the relationship was marginally non-significant (area, GLM; χ 2 = 2.66; df = 1; p = 0.10; parameter estimate ±s.e. = 0.0018±0.0011) (population size, GLM; χ 2 = 1.73; df = 1; p = 0.18; parameter estimate ±s.e. = 5.5e −7 ±4.2e −7 ).
In particular, a negative moderation effect was found for tenseness ( β 3 = −.42; p <.05), depression ( β 3 = −1.86; p <.01), worry ( β 3 = −.55; p <.05), miserableness ( β 3 = −.87; p <.01), and uneasiness ( β 3 = −.53; p <.01), while the moderation effect for gloominess approached conventional levels of significance ( β 3 = −.43; p <.10).