Excerpts

Results from both parametric and ML models indicate that the effect of log detection time delay is marginally significant (p<0.10) in slightly reducing expenditure.

Findings that were significant or approached significance (p<0.10) are reported in Table 4 .

Although it did not reach p<0.05 FDR corrected significance, there was a trend toward significance in the left lingual gyrus for the TIN>HL contrast as well (the region reached significance at p<0.1 FDR corrected).

Changes in two other genes approached significance (>0.05 to p<0.1), 14-3-3 epsilon at two ages, P7+1d and P7+7d and FABP7 at P7+1d.

Several of these differences reached statistical significance or showed a trend toward significance (p < 0.10).

Due to sex differences in associations of parental SEP with health outcomes related to AL [ 28 – 33 ], and because formal tests of interaction with sex were significant ( p < .05) or marginally significant ( p < .10) for four factors (maternal smoking in the final trimester ( p = .058), complications at birth ( p = .072), maternal BMI ( p = .011) and not living with parents at one year ( p = .032), all analyses were stratified by sex.

A marginally significant difference was observed between HRA− and HRA+ infants (t(20) = 1.74, p <0.1; two-tailed, p <0.05, one-tailed, Cohen’s d = 0.8) with higher coherence in the HRA− group As in the results presented in the previous section, there was a main effect of condition (F(2,70) = 52.2 p <0.0001; Cohen’s f = 1.5).

Free testosterone was not significantly associated with either total water or fat in the breast, but had an inverse association, of borderline significance (p = 0.10) with total water in the follicular phase and a weak positive association with total fat (p = 0.18) in the luteal phase.

Indoor air bacterial communities reveal almost significant differences compared to those of floor dust (0.05< p <0.1).

With regards to disclosure, women who fully disclosed ring use and study participation to their partners had higher PS and lower PR scores, with marginally significant differences in mean scores (at p<0.1).

Differences were considered to be significant if p<0.05 and a statistical trend if p<0.1.

The factor that showed a tendency towards significance (at p<0.1) was ‘source of water’.

In contrast, the mRNA level of Selh was increased by 22.8% (p = 0.062) and 16.2% (p < 0.05) in the cerebellum and the pons, respectively, and that of Selt displayed an increasing trend by 17% (p = 0.1) and 21.8% (p = 0.065) in cortex and pons, respectively.

Type III sums of squares were used in all analyses (‘car’ package) to account for unequal numbers of observations among treatment groups, and effects were considered significant if P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant if P ≤ 0.10.

Furthermore, there was a marginally significant negative effect of soil from heterospecifics vs. conspecifics on the survival of Prunus serotina seedlings (GLMM, F 1,53 = 2.77, P = 0.10; Fig. 1 ), and other species were unaffected (H1)( P ≥0.40).

Time periods 2500ms and 4000ms produced similar differences and approached significance ( p < .1) (see Fig 7C ).

A two-sided t -test indicated that the difference between these two means was marginally significant ( t 4341 = 1.29; p = .10).

Analyses of the variability of reaction time (measured as a subject's standard deviation of reaction time) revealed a marginally significant main effect of timbre [ F (3,81) = 2.20, p <0.1]; post-hoc tests determined that response times were marginally more variable during flute-tone discrimination than during pure-tone discrimination ( Table 2 ; p <0.08); no other significant differences were found.

Potential correlates that remained marginally statistically significant (p<0.10) from the univariable analyses were entered in final models including all variables and covariates.

The negative association between log(uMMA) and eGFR was observed with marginal significance in both the 2001 sample (b = −2.13, p = 0.10) and the 2003 sample (b = −4.48, p = 0.06).

7 experimental days or 7 meal components), marginal significance ( P <0.1) is also indicated so the reader will be able to reach own conclusions about these results.

Our results showed a trend for suitable environment having an impact on response to the object and noise aggregate indicator (P = 0.1).

Ex vivo regional and voxel based morphometry following learning The total brain volume only showed a trend (p = 0.1) towards being enlarged in reachers (450± 11 mm 3 ) relative to controls (441±12 mm 3 ).

Correlation analysis of the frontopolar cortex with the palatability rating revealed a negative Spearman’s Rho correlation of r = −0.8 which was significant at the trend level (p = 0.10).

Samples from leprosy patients showed down-regulation of CCL2, CCL3, CCL4 (p<0.05), while IL1β and SOD2 were borderline significant (p<0.1), confirming a repression of these genes by M. leprae ex vivo , as was observed in vitro in THP-1 ( Figure 2 ).