Excerpts

The strain by treatment interaction was trending towards significance for Ps.BFR/BS (F = 3.19, p = 0.085) and was not significant for Ec.BFR/BS (F = 1.38, p = 0.251).

Additionally, a statistical trend of difference (p = 0.085) between SH and BF was observed before training.

The effects of mecamylamine were generally greater in the Nic + Mec EVEN group compared to the Nic + Mec ALL group, a difference that was significant on test days 4 and 6 (q = 6.2 and 5.2, respectively, p < 0.01) and marginally significant on test day 2 and 8 (q = 3.4 and 3.3, respectively, p = 0.085 and 0.095).

Similarly, sulcatone elicited significant aversive responses at 10 −6 M (OI = -0.34 ± 0.11; mean ± s.e.m.; n = 21; Wilcoxon signed-rank, Z = -77, p < 0.01) while the OI value at 10 −5 M sulcatone approached significance (-0.24 ± 0.12; n = 22; Wilcoxon signed-rank, Z = -53, p = 0.085) ( Fig 3 ).

On the other hand, the overweight females presented only with a marginal trend towards increased risk for meningioma (pooled RR = 1.11, 95%CI: 0.99–1.25, p = 0.085, nine study arms, I 2 = 8.3%, Fig G in S1 File ).

Because the group difference in PIQ approached significance ( p = .085; Table 1 ), PIQ was controlled for in all statistical analyses.

However, the interaction between group and elevation was marginally significant (Type II ANOVA, F1, 15 = 3.41, P = 0.085), suggesting that the relationship between elevation and haplotype number may differ between groups.

Post hoc analyses revealed no significant simple effects, but a marginally significant RT difference in the high load condition ( P = 0.085).

Finally, a two-way ANOVA including response type (distance) and numerical value was also conducted on the accuracy rates data, revealing a trend for an interaction in the hypothesized direction (see Fig 1B ), however this interaction was only marginally significant, F(1, 31) = 3.18, p = .085, η 2 p = .09.

The effect of Condition was significant for children who heard the confident individual provide the second set of answers, t (42) = 2.48, p = .012, d = .74, and was marginally significant for the first set, t (50) = 1.76, p = .085, d = .49.

For non-cognates, in the first repetition there was a significant interaction between experiment and priming (F1(1,115) = 11.495, MSE = 14143.137, p = .001; F2(1,172) = 14.361, MSE = 29736.914, p < .001), a significant main effect of language (F1(1,115) = 16.382, MSE = 37476.322, p<001; F2(1,172) = 9.966, MSE = 127153.134, p = .002), a marginally significant main effect of experiment by subjects only (F1(1,115) = 3.010, MSE = 37476.322, p = .085; F2<1) and marginally significant interactions between experiment and language also by subjects only (F1(1,115) = 3.761, MSE = 37476.322, p = .055; F2(1,172) = 1.404, MSE = 127153.134, p = .238).

A negative trend was identified between soil base saturation and stand age ( R 2 = 0.29, P = 0.0854, N = 11).

After gender effect was controlled, we found a marginally significant partial correlation ( r (150) = .140, p = .086) between PSTR and IJS difference, implying that the effect was weaker than previously thought.

Median income, while showing a negative trend (β = -1.21 × 10 -7 ), did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.086).

The results revealed marginally significant main effects of task (F(1, 20) = 3.26, p = 0.086.), with stronger connectivity found in the trade-off instruction task (mean = 0.35, std = 0.23) than in the preferential choice task (mean = 0.29, std = 0.22).

Results indicated a marginally significant difference between coefficients under moderate fatigue (40 min) and baseline states ( p =.086), with no significant differences among other pairwise comparisons Table 8 .

In conditioning ( Figure 3B ), comparison by two-way mixed repeated measures ANOVA (group × conditioning trial No.) indicated that there were marginally significant main effect of group [F(1, 14) = 3.411, p = 0.086; control, n = 9; KO, n = 7], and significant interaction between group and conditioning trial No.

The goodness-of-fit test on all the characteristic species showed that in the mountains only the mycetophages were significantly unevenly distributed among the sampled heights (χ 2 = 16.294, p < 0.01), while the result for all characteristic species was marginally insignificant (χ 2 = 8.098, p = 0.086).

There was a trend toward significance for the intercept ( p = 0.086).

Conversely, higher threat appraisal scores were related to lower pre- to post-manipulation self-efficacy scores, though the association reflected only a statistical trend ( p = .086).

Commuting time to the rehabilitation centre also showed a trend towards a negatively association with treatment success in model 1 and model 4, (β = -0.01, 95%CI = -0.03–0.00, p-value = 0.086; β = -0.01, 95%CI = - -0.02–0.00, p-value = 0.093, respectively).

Feed conversion In Fig 4 , it is possible to identify that the use of conditioners in litter compared to untreated litter did not show any statistical difference, although it is possible to see a positive trend for improvement in feed conversion in the treated group (MD = -0.013, IC = -0.029–0.002, P = 0.086).

As the interaction term was of borderline significance (p = 0.086), we split the data into follow-up periods (≤2, 2–4, >4 years from HIV seroconversion) to ensure HCV infected individuals were being compared to individuals with similar duration of HIV infection.

The LOW and HI clusters experienced increases in type II fCSA (p<0.05) and increases in the MOD cluster approached significance (p = 0.086).

The ratio of CMJ:SJ showed a decreasing trend over time (F (2.50) = 2.575; p = 0.086; ES = 0.87).