There was a marginally significant interaction of nonverbal behavior with participant gender ( F (1,1362) = 3.00, p = .084, η 2 p = .002) such that in the unempathic condition, women perceived physicians as less empathic ( M = 1.73, SD = .88) than men ( M = 2.05, SD = .98, F (679) = 13.48, p < .001, η 2 p = .02).
Excerpts
showed a trendp = 0.084
Both high burden of cerebellar intracortical lesions and brain WML showed a trend to predict SDMT score (β = −7.869, 95% CI −16.843 to 1.106, p = 0.084, and β = −7.837, 95% CI −16.371 to 0.698, p = 0.071, respectively).
showed a trendp = 0.084
CD4 + T cell counts <570 cells/μl (p = 0.007) and in particular IP-10≥249 pg/ml (p = 0.001) were associated with rapid disease progression, while VL ≥5 log 10 RNA copies/ml only showed a trend for significance (p = 0.084) ( Figure 4E ).
showed a trendP =0.0846
Toll-like receptor-5 mRNA level was down-regulated by CORT injection in the duodenum and ileum ( P < 0.05) and showed a trend of down-regulation in the jejunum ( P =0.0846).
approached significancep = .085
Because the group difference in PIQ approached significance ( p = .085; Table 1 ), PIQ was controlled for in all statistical analyses.
This revealed a marginally significant main effect of Color Swap ( F (1,34) = 3.158, p = 0.085, η 2 p = 0.085), no effect of Reward Magnitude ( F <1), and an interaction between the factors ( F (1,34) = 4.944, p = 0.034, η 2 p = 0.127).
Mostly, there was no effect of mowing treatments on MBC or MBN, except a marginally significant effect of one of the mowing treatments (M10) on soil MBC (p = 0.085) and a significant effect of another (M15) on soil MBN (p = 0.005).
However, changes in active submission over time were near-significant for the placebo group ( χ 2 = 11.122, P = 0.085), but not DAP group ( χ 2 = 7.714, P = 0.260; Fig 6C ).
Finally, a two-way ANOVA including response type (distance) and numerical value was also conducted on the accuracy rates data, revealing a trend for an interaction in the hypothesized direction (see Fig 1B ), however this interaction was only marginally significant, F(1, 31) = 3.18, p = .085, η 2 p = .09.
The effect of Condition was significant for children who heard the confident individual provide the second set of answers, t (42) = 2.48, p = .012, d = .74, and was marginally significant for the first set, t (50) = 1.76, p = .085, d = .49.
Regarding LDL-related variables, high CVR was associated with high ApoB levels ( P = 0.025) (but not with significant differences in LDL-C levels, P >0.05), low LDL resistance against oxidation (low LDL lag time values) ( P = 0.019), and low estimated LDL size ( P = 0.001), and with a borderline significant trend towards high LDL oxidation ( P = 0.085) ( Fig 2 ).
approached significancep = .085
Sex did not significantly improve fit beyond the base model for ship thrusts, but the difference approached significance, Δχ 2 (2) = 4.94, p = .085.
showed a trendP = 0.085
While no significant difference was detected between genotypes, G93A male SED mice showed a trend to have 68.7% more BrdU-labeled cells than G93A female SED mice (226±32/mm 2 vs 134±17/mm 2 ; P = 0.085) ( Figure 1D ).
The effects of mecamylamine were generally greater in the Nic + Mec EVEN group compared to the Nic + Mec ALL group, a difference that was significant on test days 4 and 6 (q = 6.2 and 5.2, respectively, p < 0.01) and marginally significant on test day 2 and 8 (q = 3.4 and 3.3, respectively, p = 0.085 and 0.095).
showed a trendp = 0.085
The remaining two genes showed a trend ( p = 0.085) and a numerical difference ( p = 0.105).
For non-cognates, in the first repetition there was a significant interaction between experiment and priming (F1(1,115) = 11.495, MSE = 14143.137, p = .001; F2(1,172) = 14.361, MSE = 29736.914, p < .001), a significant main effect of language (F1(1,115) = 16.382, MSE = 37476.322, p<001; F2(1,172) = 9.966, MSE = 127153.134, p = .002), a marginally significant main effect of experiment by subjects only (F1(1,115) = 3.010, MSE = 37476.322, p = .085; F2<1) and marginally significant interactions between experiment and language also by subjects only (F1(1,115) = 3.761, MSE = 37476.322, p = .055; F2(1,172) = 1.404, MSE = 127153.134, p = .238).
The AUC of %fPSA in the PSA range 4.0–10.0 ng/ml was significantly better than PSA in patients aged 75–79 years (p = 0.024), and 70-74-year-olds were borderline significant (p = 0.085).
showed a trendp = 0.085
The dual staining in the same region showed a trend toward increased F4/80+ve—Perls double staining (cells/mm 2 ) in the GSK2849330 treated group (37.24±11.34) vs the vehicle group (15.54±3.67) Fig 7E (p = 0.085).
Response times The analysis of Experiment 1a revealed no main effect of Observed Action, F [ 1 , 36 ] = 2.233, p = .144, ηρ 2 = .058, but a marginally significant main effect of Action Typicality, F [ 1 , 36 ] = 3.140, p = .085, ηρ 2 = .080, as well as an interaction between both factors, F [ 1 , 36 ] = 6.378, p = .016, ηρ 2 = .151.
approached significancep = 0.085
Similarly, sulcatone elicited significant aversive responses at 10 −6 M (OI = -0.34 ± 0.11; mean ± s.e.m.; n = 21; Wilcoxon signed-rank, Z = -77, p < 0.01) while the OI value at 10 −5 M sulcatone approached significance (-0.24 ± 0.12; n = 22; Wilcoxon signed-rank, Z = -53, p = 0.085) ( Fig 3 ).
Time spent in the bark chamber did not differ by sex, although there was a nonsignificant trend for females to spend more time in the bark chamber (males: 29.71 ± 4.28 s; females: 39.76 ± 3.87 s, ANOVA, F(1,80) = 3.032, p = 0.085).
Post hoc analyses revealed no significant simple effects, but a marginally significant RT difference in the high load condition ( P = 0.085).
This analysis revealed greater peak responses in the LBD group, in comparison with the HBD group, during the instruction “look ahead at the whole body” (p = .020) and marginally significant group differences for “open the mirror” (p = .085), “face and head” (p = .090), “neck and arms” (p = .075) and “back side” (p = .089).
Overall, the odds of mental health distress increased by a marginally significant 22% (OR 1.22 [CI 0.99–1.49] p = 0.085).
On the other hand, the overweight females presented only with a marginal trend towards increased risk for meningioma (pooled RR = 1.11, 95%CI: 0.99–1.25, p = 0.085, nine study arms, I 2 = 8.3%, Fig G in S1 File ).