Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

a borderline significant trendP = 0.0851.7× alphagold
Regarding LDL-related variables, high CVR was associated with high ApoB levels ( P = 0.025) (but not with significant differences in LDL-C levels, P >0.05), low LDL resistance against oxidation (low LDL lag time values) ( P = 0.019), and low estimated LDL size ( P = 0.001), and with a borderline significant trend towards high LDL oxidation ( P = 0.085) ( Fig 2 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0851.7× alphagold
The effects of mecamylamine were generally greater in the Nic + Mec EVEN group compared to the Nic + Mec ALL group, a difference that was significant on test days 4 and 6 (q = 6.2 and 5.2, respectively, p < 0.01) and marginally significant on test day 2 and 8 (q = 3.4 and 3.3, respectively, p = 0.085 and 0.095).
marginally significantp = .0851.7× alphagold
For non-cognates, in the first repetition there was a significant interaction between experiment and priming (F1(1,115) = 11.495, MSE = 14143.137, p = .001; F2(1,172) = 14.361, MSE = 29736.914, p < .001), a significant main effect of language (F1(1,115) = 16.382, MSE = 37476.322, p<001; F2(1,172) = 9.966, MSE = 127153.134, p = .002), a marginally significant main effect of experiment by subjects only (F1(1,115) = 3.010, MSE = 37476.322, p = .085; F2<1) and marginally significant interactions between experiment and language also by subjects only (F1(1,115) = 3.761, MSE = 37476.322, p = .055; F2(1,172) = 1.404, MSE = 127153.134, p = .238).
marginally significantp = .0851.7× alphagold
Response times The analysis of Experiment 1a revealed no main effect of Observed Action, F [ 1 , 36 ] = 2.233, p = .144, ηρ 2 = .058, but a marginally significant main effect of Action Typicality, F [ 1 , 36 ] = 3.140, p = .085, ηρ 2 = .080, as well as an interaction between both factors, F [ 1 , 36 ] = 6.378, p = .016, ηρ 2 = .151.
marginally significantp = .0851.7× alphagold
This analysis revealed greater peak responses in the LBD group, in comparison with the HBD group, during the instruction “look ahead at the whole body” (p = .020) and marginally significant group differences for “open the mirror” (p = .085), “face and head” (p = .090), “neck and arms” (p = .075) and “back side” (p = .089).