Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = .081.6× alphagold
A two-way ANOVA with 2 levels of movement property (dynamic central + static peripheral, static central + dynamic peripheral) x 2 levels of stimulus orientations (upright central + inverted peripheral, inverted central + upright peripheral) on the proportion of valid trials revealed a marginally significant interaction, F (1,17) = 3.53, p = .08, η p 2 = .17.
only marginally significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
On the other hand, women who reported having contraceptive use support from their partners had a reduced risk of discontinuing, relative to women who said their partners did not support their contraceptive use, though this association was only marginally significant (aOR = 0.59, p = 0.08).
showed a trendP = 0.081.6× alpha
Individual housing of mice increases energy expenditure and energy intake and results in anhedonia Indirect calorimetry revealed that energy expenditure was increased in IND compared to SOC: During adolescence (PN40-40), IND showed a trend for higher energy expenditure during the light phase (P = 0.08), this effect reached significance after adjusting for LBM ( Table 3 ).
approached significancep≤0.081.6× alpha
These results show that expression of extracellular matrix genes COL3A1, COL5A1, COL11A1 and FN1 are significantly increased in muscle-invasive bladder tumors relative to Ta/T1 (p<0.05), while changes in CDC25C, MAPK10 and ErbB3 expression approached significance (p≤0.08) ( Table 4 ).
just short of significancep <0.081.6× alphagold
A 2-way repeated measures ANOVA with cue-type and number-of-items as factors indicated that the main effect of cue type was non-significant ( F (3,21) = 1.6, p = 0.22), the main effect of number-of-items was significant ( F (1,7) = 6.46, p <0.04), and the interaction between these factors falls just short of significance ( F (3,21) = 2.67, p <0.08).
tendency toward significancep = 0.0801.6× alphagold
Fig 2 illustrates that the AUD+Gambling group had higher scores in the BIS Nonplanning ( t (100) = -3.024, p = 0.003, Cohen’s d = -0.634) and the BIS Total scores ( t (100) = -2.635, p = 0.010, Cohen’s d = -0.555), and a tendency toward significance in the BIS Motor Impulsivity ( t (100) = -1.767, p = 0.080, Cohen’s d = -0.371).