Barely Significant
← all phrases

“not fully significant”

50 sentences · 50 papers · 222 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.085

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

not fully significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Checks for spurious effects with Oldham’s method confirmed validity for the correlation with reading accuracy in L-types (especially with text reading accuracy: r = −0.528, p = 0.052, whereas other components were not fully significant) and with reading speed in P-types (for all components: r ≤ −0.339, p ≤ 0.024), but not for word reading accuracy (r = −0.022, p = 0.887).
not fully significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Interestingly, Mann–Whitney post-hoc analysis showed a significant increase of the trust scores assigned to the untrustworthy faces in the SM condition (Mdn = 30%, 95%CI [27.5, 30]) compared to the NM condition (Mdn = 20%, 95%CI [15, 25]) ( U = 429, p < 0.001, r = 0.41) and, albeit not fully significant, to the TM one (Mdn = 20%, 95%CI [20, 30]) ( U = 636, p = 0.057, r = 0.21) – indicating that untrustworthy faces are rated as “less untrustworthy” when wearing TM and, even less, when wearing SM.
Although gender differences are not fully significant for some food categories, the SUR test provides systematic evidence supporting the gendered dietary preference hypothesis from two dimensions: the allocation differential associated with household income growth and the decision-making weight linked to individual economic contribution.
The multivariate analysis confirmed age (OR: 1.07; 95%CI: 1.02–1.13; p = 0.008) together with three other (even if not fully significant) characteristics of spontaneous text (writing score - spatial orientation; total number of words; and percent of errors) as independent factors associated with cognitive impairment.
Our model allows some estimate of the relative contribution of these effects, although this is not fully significant since they are not additive: We built survival curves for the highest force ( Figure 4D ) with the following assumptions: i) force sharing, rebinding and bond strengthening, ii) rebinding and bond strengthening, iii) force sharing and bond strengthening, and iv) force sharing and rebinding.