Despite the small number of cell lines tested here, we conclude that 74% of toxicity-modulating proteins in our screen appears to be different from the random sampling of proteins (borderline significance, p = 0.08 (Fischer's exact test)).
Participants in the 1 st sham-iTBS group showed a marginally significant higher AUCi during the first session (i.e., sham-iTBS) than during the second session (active-iTBS) ( p = 0.08).
Facet Level_SOLUTION2 showed a trend of explaining more variance in the factor scores of the confirmatory (5) factor solution than Facet Level_SOLUTION1 (T = 1.83, df = 24, p = 0.08, two samples T-test).
The ANOVA of Prime×Target×Group further showed a significant interaction among Prime, Target, and Group ( F (1,36) = 4.25, p <.05, partial η 2 = .11), but marginal significance for Target effect ( F (1,36) = 6.74, p <.08, partial η 2 = .09).
In recent literature, the association between vertebrobasilar stroke or other cerebellar diseases, and impaired emotion recognition was found.[ 32 – 34 ] Furthermore, functional MRI studies showed that the cerebellum is critically implicated in social cognition.[ 35 , 36 ] It is up for discussion whether age and educational level should also have been included as covariates in the ANCOVA, because chi-square and t-tests on differences between patients and controls approached significance on these factors (age: t = -1.8, p = 0.08; and education level: X 2 = 2.5, p = 0.12).
The association between cataract surgery and mortality was marginally non-significant by pooling 8 study findings (pooled HR: 1.27, 95% CI, 0.97, 1.66; P = 0.08; I 2 = 76.6%).
Similarly, the association between TBI severity and satisfaction was approaching significance (p = 0.08), suggesting that caregivers of veterans with moderate or severe injury severity may be more satisfied with care recipient inpatient care compared to caregivers of veterans with mild injury severity.
The difference between JNDs for men's and women's ratings of attractiveness approached significance (independent-sample t-test: t(6) = 2.05, p = 0.08, Cohen's d = 1.45).
Basal fasted glucose levels in HF mice compared to LF approached significance after both 3 days ( P = 0.08) and 1 week ( P = 0.052) on diet but were not different after 16 weeks.
The magnitude of inter-arm asymmetry was significantly greater in TP than in CG in forearm extensors (P<0.05), whilst forearm flexors showed a trend to greater asymmetry in TP (P = 0.08).
A one-way ANOVA for treatment group on the density of Arc mRNA expression in PRL ( Figure 7B ) showed a strong trend (F 4,23 = 2.4, p = 0.08) towards significance.
Only haplotype *2 in the recipient (rs41507953 A / rs751141 A/ rs1042032 G) displayed a statistical trend towards higher risk of ARE [OR = 2.28 (0.92–5.67), p = 0.08].
Although the mean difference between causally related and unrelated words (1.97μV) was larger than the mean difference between causally related and hierarchically related words (1.49μV), only marginally significant difference was found between causally related and unrelated words ( p = .08).
Consistent with this, we found that the median β was higher in studies that report IBD (median β = 0.19; CI = 0.011–1.14) compared to studies that found no evidence of IBD (median β = 0.015; CI = 0.0–0.98; Table 2 ), although this latter result was marginally non-significant in two-tailed tests ( P = 0.08 IBD vs.
In the PP and SILP, the CD8 T cell compartment showed a trend towards increased early-activated CD8 T cells after WT- treatment only ( WT vs. medium P = 0.08 and P = 0.06 resp.) ( Figure 3C ).
A similar decline in personal distress score between the younger and the older control participants approached significance [F(1,95) = 2.9, P = 0.08)].
In GA, the Mantel r values between site distance and site dissimilarity were marginally significant for species and functional groups (Randomization tests: P = 0.08 and 0.06, respectively), and significant for taxonomic groups (Randomization tests: P = 0.04).
A two-way mixed-design ANOVA [ Group (NEA, Control) X Time (Pre/Post experimental phase)] with repeated-measures on the second factor ( Time ) revealed that the Group X Time interaction approached significance ( F (1, 45) = 3.13, p = .08, η p 2 = .06).