Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significant tendencyP = 0.0781.6× alphagold
The equivalent analyses for mean diclofenac concentrations in those samples with detectable levels indicated that concentrations were also lower in T3 than in T1 ( T + = 27, N = 7, one-tailed P = 0.016), and had a marginally significant tendency to be lower in T3 than T2 ( T + = 18, N = 6, one-tailed P = 0.078).
marginally significantp = 0.0781.6× alphagold
When investigating the role of the size of the Bayesian prediction by adding variable True and the appropriate set of interactions for the diff-in-diff-in-diff, we observe the triple interaction marginally significant (p = 0.078) and positive for the private signals (column 4) which means that the precision of subjects in treatment group was relatively to the control group a little worse after the treatment intervention.
Social learning under acute stress.
PLoS One · 2018 · PMC6104985
a statistical trendp = 0.0791.6× alphagold
Post hoc univariate analyses showed that females (n = 163) scored significantly higher than males (n = 162) in the EC subscale (M f = 28.63 vs M m = 25.77; F 1,320 = 10.472; p<0.005), and a statistical trend in the same direction was observed in the PD subscale (M f = 19.32 vs M m = 17.44; F 1,320 = 3.108; p = 0.079), while there were no differences in the PT subscale (M f = 25.89 vs M m = 24.12; F 1,320 = 1.165; p = 0.281) and in the FS subscale (M f = 24.49 vs M m = 22.45; F 1,320 = 2.368; p = 0.125; Figure 1 ).
of borderline significancep = 0.0791.6× alpha
The higher risk of infection in siblings remained significant when controlling for other case and contact variables in multivariable models; greater transmissibility associated with vomiting was of borderline significance when accounting for other index case characteristics (OR = 2.50, p = 0.079) as well as in the full models accounting for contact characteristics (OR = 2.42, p = 0.135).
approaching significancep = .0791.6× alphagold
Attention facilitation to both positive ( r = .21, p < .01) and negative images ( r = .19, p < .05) was modestly (but significantly) correlated with SRCT secure responses with the Spearman rank correlation approaching significance for positive images (i.e., controlling for outliers on the attention index, rho = .14, p = .079).